Participation in individual and collective agri-environmental schemes: A synthesis using the Theory of Planned Behaviour

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  Journal of Rural Studies

• Publication date

  2024-04-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103255
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• What is the behaviour change Wheel?

  2024cited by this paper
• The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri‐environmental schemes: A systematic review

  2023cited by this paper
• A conceptual framework for measuring transaction costs in agri-environmental schemes: an application to the Dutch collective scheme

  2023cited by this paper
• Culture and Agricultural Biodiversity Conservation

  2023cited by this paper
• Biodiversity indicators for result-based agri-environmental schemes – Current state and future prospects

  2023cited by this paper
• Grassroots innovation: Scenario, policy and governance

  2022cited by this paper
• How can the European Common Agricultural Policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts

  2022cited by this paper
• European Agri-environmental Policy: Evolution, Effectiveness, and Challenges

  2022cited by this paper
• The supply of multiple ecosystem services requires biodiversity across spatial scales

  2022cited by this paper
• Linking Perceived Policy Effectiveness and Proenvironmental Behavior: The Influence of Attitude, Implementation Intention, and Knowledge

  2021cited by this paper
• Types of collective action problems and farmers’ willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland

  2021cited by this paper
• A mixed-methods analysis for improving farmer participation in agri-environmental payments for ecosystem services in Vermont, USA

  2021cited by this paper
• “Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the Alternative Land Use Services program in Ontario

  2020cited by this paper
• Characteristics and impact of theory of planned behavior interventions on smoking behavior: A systematic review of the literature.

  2020cited by this paper
• An analysis of farmers’ intention to use green pesticides: The application of the extended theory of planned behavior and health belief model

  2020cited by this paper
• Social learning and land lease to stimulate the delivery of ecosystem services in intensive arable farming

  2020cited by this paper
• Farmer Behaviour as Reasoned Action: A Critical Review of Research with the Theory of Planned Behaviour

  2020cited by this paper
• Game-changing potential of the EU’s Farm to Fork Strategy

  2020cited by this paper
• From Policy to Practice: From Ideas to Results, From Results to Trust

  2019cited by this paper
• When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?

  2019cited by this paper
• The Role of Farmers' Understanding of Nature in Shaping their Uptake of Nature Protection Measures

  2019cited by this paper
• An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks

  2019cited by this paper
• Trusting the People and the System. The Interrelation Between Interpersonal and Institutional Trust in Collective Action for Agri-Environmental Management

  2019cited by this paper
• Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review

  2019cited by this paper
• Putting nature ‘to work’ through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Tensions between autonomy, voluntary action and the political economy of agri-environmental practice

  2019cited by this paper
• Farmers’ perceptions, preferences, and propositions for result-oriented measures in mountain farming

  2018cited by this paper
• Improving Spatial Coordination Rates under the Agglomeration Bonus Scheme: A Laboratory Experiment with a Pecuniary and a Non‐Pecuniary Mechanism (NUDGE)

  2018cited by this paper
• The case for qualitative methods in behavioural studies for EU policy-making

  2018cited by this paper
• Unstoppable climate change? The influence of fatalistic beliefs about climate change on behavioural change and willingness to pay cross-nationally

  2018cited by this paper
• Landowner and Practitioner Perspectives on Private Land Conservation Programs

  2018cited by this paper
• Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agri-environment measures

  2018cited by this paper
• A Theory of Planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains

  2018cited by this paper
• Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production

  2017cited by this paper
• Promoting nature conservation by Dutch farmers: a governance perspective†

  2017cited by this paper
• Acceptance of a Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme: The Decisive Influence of Collective Action

  2017cited by this paper
• A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems

  2017cited by this paper
• Using conservation auctions informed by environmental performance models to reduce agricultural nutrient flows into Lake Erie

  2016cited by this paper
• Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

  2016cited by this paper
• Result-based agri-environment measures: Market-based instruments, incentives or rewards? The case of Baden-Württemberg

  2016cited by this paper
• Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism

  2015cited by this paper
• Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe

  2015cited by this paper
• What influences farmers' acceptance of agrienvironment schemes? An ex-post application of the 'Theory of Planned Behaviour'

  2015cited by this paper
• Local institutions and farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes

  2015cited by this paper
• What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis

  2015cited by this paper
• The Multidimensionality of Trust: Applications in Collaborative Natural Resource Management

  2015cited by this paper
• Identifying the Factors That Influence Farmer Participation in Environmental Management Practices in Switzerland

  2014cited by this paper
• Motivations for implementation of ecological compensation areas on Swiss lowland farms

  2014cited by this paper
• Farmer Participation in U.S. Farm Bill Conservation Programs

  2014cited by this paper
• Effort for money? Farmers' rationale for participation in agri-environment measures with different implementation complexity.

  2013cited by this paper
• Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior

  2013cited by this paper
• Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change

  2013cited by this paper
• Considering the source: commercialisation and trust in agri-environmental information and advisory services in England.

  2013cited by this paper
• Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways: A temporal analysis of farmer motivations

  2013cited by this paper
• FORUM: Landscape‐scale conservation: collaborative agri‐environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate?

  2013cited by this paper
• Legitimacy and Organizational Sustainability

  2012cited by this paper
• The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes?

  2012cited by this paper
• Qualitative application of the theory of planned behavior to understand beverage consumption behaviors among adults.

  2012cited by this paper
• Analyzing collective action

  2010cited by this paper
• Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example

  2010cited by this paper
• An introduction to qualitative research for food and nutrition professionals.

  2009cited by this paper
• Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives

  2009cited by this paper
• Food Scares and Trust: A European Study

  2008cited by this paper
• Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison

  2008cited by this paper
• Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes

  2008cited by this paper
• Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: An assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union

  2006cited by this paper
• Application and impact of the Single Payment Scheme: a theory of planned behaviour analysis (Defra Research Project EPES 0405/17: research to understand and model the behaviour and motivations of farmers in responding to policy changes (England))

  2006cited by this paper
• Factors Affecting European Farmers' Participation in Biodiversity Policies

  2006cited by this paper
• The role of routines in reducing pervasive uncertainty

  2005cited by this paper
• Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management

  2005cited by this paper
• Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective

  2004cited by this paper
• Conserving English Landscapes: Land Managers and Agri-Environmental Policy

  2003cited by this paper
• Achieving Whole-Landscape Management across Multiple Land Management Units: A case study from the Lake District Environmentally Sensitive Area

  2000cited by this paper
• Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective.

  2000cited by this paper
• Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes

  2000cited by this paper
• Promoting farmer uptake of agri-environment schemes: the Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme

  2000cited by this paper
• Human Dimensions of Climate Change: Cultural Theory and Collective Action

  1998cited by this paper
• Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches

  1995cited by this paper
• The theory of planned behavior

  1991cited by this paper
• From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior

  1985cited by this paper

• Behavioural drivers of village savings and loan association participation for social protection in small-scale fishing communities

  2026cites this paper
• Who Produces Natural Wine (and Who Would Like To)?

  2026cites this paper
• From digital decision-support to policy implementation: An operational framework for agri-environmental schemes

  2026cites this paper
• English farmers’ views on agroforestry and agroforestry scheme characteristics: a qualitative analysis of drivers and facilitators of engagement

  2026influential citation
• Factors Influencing Farmers’ Participation in Environmentally Friendly Measures: The Case of the First Implementation of Eco-Schemes

  2026cites this paper
• Innovation for a Sustainable Future: Boosting Circular Economy Practices in Agriculture

  2025cites this paper
• Evaluating the sustainability and leverage potential of innovative organic farming systems

  2025cites this paper
• Disentangling farmers’ perspectives on agri-environment-climate measures through ex-post assessment

  2025cites this paper
• A Rapid Mapping Review of Studies on the Motivations and Barriers to Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program

  2025cites this paper
• Farmers'perceived financial and non-financial costs of their biodiversity measures – Exploring viewpoints with Q-methodology

  2025cites this paper
• “Why would a farmer pay more money to use something that’s not gonna give them anything back”: Identifying gaps and opportunities to promote regenerative agriculture in Alberta, Canada

  2025cites this paper
• UAV-assisted deep learning to support results-based agri-environmental schemes: Facilitating Eco-Scheme 5 implementation in Germany

  2025cites this paper
• The effect of government publicity and guidance on farmers’ ecological environment governance participation behavior—The mediating effect of environmental literacy and perceived value

  2025cites this paper
• Factors influencing farmer participation in bottom-up collaborative agri-environment-climate measures

  2025cites this paper
• Landowners’ decisions on participating in a voluntary riparian tree-planting project in Norway: A qualitative study using the theory of planned behaviour

  2025cites this paper
• Do Community‐Oriented Farmers Present a Greater Willingness for Organic Transition: Evidence From Vietnam

  2025cites this paper
• Discrepancies between farmers' willingness and behavior: an analysis of participation in cooperative economic organizations

  2025cites this paper
• Research on the healing concept based on systems psychology, local attachment and sustainable rural development

  2025cites this paper
• Can information framing increase farmers' uptake of Eco-schemes? a randomised controlled trial

  2025cites this paper
• Farmers’ views on the institutional design of agri-environmental collectives: a case study in Brandenburg, Germany

  2025cites this paper
• Ethical crossroads in agricultural data: Perspectives on trust, equity and sustainability

  2025cites this paper
• What Affects the Perceived Power of Farmers’ Associations? Insights from Members’ Opinions

  2025cites this paper
• Protected Areas and Agricultural Biodiversity Conservation—Do Parks Increase AES Adoption?

  2025cites this paper
• Understanding the temporal dynamics of agri-environmental climate scheme adoption

  2025cites this paper
• Synergistic pathways to promote nature-based Solutions: How policy and peer collaboration shape herder decisions on artificial pasture cultivation in Qinghai, China

  2025cites this paper
• Collaboration among governments, agribusinesses, and rural households for improving the effectiveness of conservation tillage technology adoption

  2025cites this paper
• The effect of result‐based agri‐environmental payments on biodiversity: Evidence from Switzerland

  2025cites this paper
• Factors affecting farmer participation in agri-environment schemes in the uplands of Northern Ireland

  2025cites this paper
• Smart landscape diversification? Farmers' perspectives on how digital tools can facilitate (collective) agri-environmental action in Brandenburg, Germany

  2025cites this paper
• Overcoming barriers to agri-environmental management at landscape scale: Balancing farmer coordination and collaboration with the aid of facilitators and pioneers.

  2024cites this paper
• Assessing farmers’ intention to adopt drought insurance. A combined perspective from the extended theory of planned behavior and behavioral reasoning theory

  2024cites this paper
• Farmers’ adoption of organic agriculture—a systematic global literature review

  year unknowncites this paper