There is a widespread belief that peer effects are important in charitable giving, but surprisingly little evidence on how donors respond to their peers. We analyse a unique dataset of donations to online fundraising pages to provide evidence on the direction and magnitude of peer effects – we find that a £10 increase in the mean of past donations increases giving by £3.50, on average. We also explore potential explanations for why peers matter. We find no evidence that donations provide a signal of charity quality, nor any role for fundraising targets. Our preferred explanation is that donors benchmark themselves against the distribution of donations from their peers.
Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field
Sarah Smith,F. Windmeijer,Edmund Wright
Published 2015 in The Centre for Market and Public Organisation
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2015
- Venue
The Centre for Market and Public Organisation
- Publication date
2015-06-01
- Fields of study
Law, Economics, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-27 of 27 references · Page 1 of 1