Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field

Sarah Smith,F. Windmeijer,Edmund Wright

Published 2015 in The Centre for Market and Public Organisation

ABSTRACT

There is a widespread belief that peer effects are important in charitable giving, but surprisingly little evidence on how donors respond to their peers. We analyse a unique dataset of donations to online fundraising pages to provide evidence on the direction and magnitude of peer effects – we find that a £10 increase in the mean of past donations increases giving by £3.50, on average. We also explore potential explanations for why peers matter. We find no evidence that donations provide a signal of charity quality, nor any role for fundraising targets. Our preferred explanation is that donors benchmark themselves against the distribution of donations from their peers.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Venue

    The Centre for Market and Public Organisation

  • Publication date

    2015-06-01

  • Fields of study

    Law, Economics, Psychology

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-27 of 27 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-100 of 213 citing papers · Page 1 of 3