Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  American Journal of Political Science

• Publication date

  2014-07-01

• Fields of study

  Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/AJPS.12091
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation

  2013cited by this paper
• All Judges Are Political Except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law (review)

  2012cited by this paper
• Polarizing cues.

  2012cited by this paper
• Reviving the Schoolmaster

  2012cited by this paper
• Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate

  2011cited by this paper
• Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence

  2011cited by this paper
• Polarizing Cues

  2011cited by this paper
• The Opposite of Republican: Polarization and Political Categorization

  2010cited by this paper
• Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization

  2010cited by this paper
• Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions

  2009cited by this paper
• Measuring Judicial Activism

  2009cited by this paper
• Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court

  2009cited by this paper
• Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?

  2008cited by this paper
• Procedural perceptions and support for the U.S. Supreme Court

  2008cited by this paper
• How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns byRichard R. Lau and David Redlawsk

  2007cited by this paper
• Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis

  2007cited by this paper
• Issue Preferences and Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

  2007cited by this paper
• How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns

  2006cited by this paper
• Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism

  2006cited by this paper
• A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People, The 2006 Election and Beyond

  2006cited by this paper
• Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases

  2006cited by this paper
• Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment

  2005influential reference
• Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences

  2005cited by this paper
• Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs.

  2003cited by this paper
• Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore

  2003cited by this paper
• The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?

  2003cited by this paper
• Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models

  2002cited by this paper
• Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work

  2002cited by this paper
• Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization

  2001cited by this paper
• Building Institutional Legitiimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice

  2001cited by this paper
• The impact of Bush v. Gore on public perceptions and knowledge of the Supreme Court

  2001cited by this paper
• Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending

  2000cited by this paper
• Elements of Reason: Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning

  2000cited by this paper
• The myth of legality and public evaluation of the Supreme Court

  2000cited by this paper
• Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality

  2000cited by this paper
• Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart

  1999cited by this paper
• The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?

  1998cited by this paper
• On the Legitimacy of National High Courts

  1998cited by this paper
• Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions

  1995cited by this paper
• The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.

  1994cited by this paper
• Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation

  1994cited by this paper
• Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues

  1993cited by this paper
• The psychology of attitudes.

  1993cited by this paper
• The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates

  1993cited by this paper
• Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court

  1992cited by this paper
• The Eti-ology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

  1992influential reference
• Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions: Three functions of source credibility

  1990cited by this paper
• Understandings of justice: Institutional legitimacy, procedural justice, and political tolerance.

  1989cited by this paper
• Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion

  1989cited by this paper
• The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes

  1988cited by this paper
• The Supreme Court and Policy Legitimation

  1984cited by this paper
• The American voter

  1960cited by this paper
• The psychology of attitudes.

  1946cited by this paper

• The Power of Presidential Partisanship: Going Public on Court Reform

  2025cites this paper
• Ad-dressing the bench: the impact of interest group advertisements on partisan perceptions of Supreme Court confirmations

  2025cites this paper
• Do Citizens in Backsliding Democracies Support International Courts’ Judicial Power? Evidence from Hungary

  2025cites this paper
• Supreme Court Legitimacy in a New Media Era: Judicial Legitimacy, Polarization, and the Changing Media Landscape

  2025cites this paper
• Women Robed in Independence: How Women Judges Influence Perceptions of Judicial Independence in Europe

  2025cites this paper
• Trust in the Judiciary and Partisan Reactions to Judicial Checks: Evidence from Argentina

  2025influential citation
• Voters do not Distinguish Between International Law Regimes: A Survey Experiment on the Relative Authority of International Law and Courts in the Human Rights and Trade Regimes

  2025cites this paper
• Partisan Cues, Anger, and Attitude Formation: Experiments on Partisan Motivated Reasoning

  2025cites this paper
• Can the Supreme Court Generate Public Acceptance of Election Rulings? Politicized Appointments, Elite Norm Violations, and the 2020 Election

  2025cites this paper
• The Partisan Foundations of Attitudes Towards State Supreme Courts

  2025cites this paper
• Partisanship versus principles: A study of voter response to intra-party corruption allegations

  2025cites this paper
• Framing the Judiciary: Effects of Partisan, Procedural, and Populist Frames on Apex Court Perceptions in Czechia

  2025cites this paper
• How the Intensity of Preference for Ideological Judges Influences Court Support

  2024cites this paper
• 280 Characters of Contention: Analyzing Partisan Behavior on Twitter During Supreme Court Confirmation Processes

  2024cites this paper
• Executives Strike Back: Political Benefits of Sanctioning the U.S. Supreme Court

  2024cites this paper
• Cognitive Aging and the Federal Circuit Courts

  2024cites this paper
• You Better Shop Around: Litigant Characteristics and Supreme Court Support

  2024cites this paper
• Going beyond Dobbs: an exploration of support for court reform

  2024cites this paper
• In court we trust? Political affinity and citizen's attitudes toward court's decisions

  2024cites this paper
• Fair Game or Foul Play: Public Perceptions of Solicitor General Involvement in U.S. Supreme Court Cases

  2024cites this paper
• Breaking the bank: Personal financial interests of Supreme Court justices and institutional legitimacy

  2024cites this paper
• The Rule of Law in Red and Blue: Affective Polarization and Support for Legal Institutions in the United States

  2024cites this paper
• A Matter of Opinion? How Unexpected Opinion Authors Influence Support for Supreme Court Decisions

  2024cites this paper
• Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers

  2024cites this paper
• Are You Talking to Me? How Ideological and Gender Characteristics Moderate the Effect of Legitimizing Rhetoric on SCOTUS Legitimacy

  2023cites this paper
• Witch Hunts? Electoral Cycles and Corruption Lawsuits in Argentina

  2023cites this paper
• Judicial reasoning, individual cultural types, and support for COVID‐19 vaccine mandates

  2023cites this paper
• How low can we go: Court approval effects on public opinion

  2023cites this paper
• The Impact of Oral Argument Attendance

  2023cites this paper
• Modern judicial confirmation hearings and institutional support for the Supreme Court

  2023cites this paper
• The Gender Gap in Supreme Court Legitimacy

  2023cites this paper
• Accountability for Court Packing

  2023cites this paper
• The Effect of State Supreme Court Selection Method on Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court

  2023cites this paper
• “Because He Is Gay”: How Race, Gender, and Sexuality Shape Perceptions of Judicial Fairness

  2023cites this paper
• Televised Oral Arguments and Judicial Legitimacy: An Initial Assessment

  2023cites this paper
• Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe

  2023cites this paper
• The American public's attitudes over how judges use legal principles to make decisions

  2023cites this paper
• Citations to Interest Groups and Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions

  2022cites this paper
• The Costs of Court Curbing: Evidence from the United States

  2022cites this paper
• Judicial Philosophy and the Public’s Support for Courts

  2022cites this paper
• Politicized Battles: How Vacancies and Partisanship Influence Support for the Supreme Court

  2022influential citation
• Public Support for Canadian Courts: Understanding the Roles of Institutional Trust and Partisanship

  2022cites this paper
• Political Hearings Reinforce Legal Norms: Confirmation Hearings and Views of the United States Supreme Court

  2022cites this paper
• The Costs of Policy Legitimation: A Test of the Political Capital Hypothesis

  2022cites this paper
• Snooze or Snub? How the Public Reacts to Judicial Attendance at the State of the Union

  2022cites this paper
• Responding to Policy Signals? An Experimental Study on Information about Policy Adoption and Data Retention Policy Support in Germany

  2021cites this paper
• Can Democratic Principles Protect High Courts from Partisan Backlash? Public Reactions to the Kenyan Supreme Court's Role in the 2017 Election Crisis

  2021cites this paper
• Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions: The Case of the U.S. Supreme Court

  2021cites this paper
• Party cues no Brasil? Um teste crucial da capacidade do sistema de partidos brasileiro em influenciar a opinião pública

  2021cites this paper
• Overview of studies

  2021cites this paper
• All the President's Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval

  2021cites this paper
• Can the Supreme Court Convince the American People? — A Survey Experiment on Public Response to the Court’s Opinion Reasoning

  2021influential citation
• Affective Polarization and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

  2021cites this paper
• Scandal-ridden campaigns: the relationship between cognitive load and candidate evaluation

  2021cites this paper
• A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support

  2020cites this paper
• Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

  2020cites this paper
• The President and the Supreme Court: Going Public on Judicial Decisions from Washington to Trump

  2020cites this paper
• Going Public on Pending Decisions

  2020cites this paper
• Going Public on Decided Cases

  2020cites this paper
• Going Public and the Supreme Court

  2020cites this paper
• Who Can Impact the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy?

  2020influential citation
• The Tone of Presidential Rhetoric on Supreme Court Decisions

  2020cites this paper
• “Where You Lead, I Will Follow”: Partisan Cueing on High‐Salience Issues in a Turbulent Multiparty System

  2020cites this paper
• Presidential Leadership of News Coverage

  2020cites this paper
• How Identity Politics Polarizes Rule of Law Opinions

  2020cites this paper
• “Appearance of Corruption”: Linking Public Opinion and Campaign Finance Reform

  2020cites this paper
• Policy Change and Public Opinion: Measuring Shifting Political Sentiment With Social Media Data

  2020cites this paper
• Loyalty over Fairness: Acceptance of Unfair Supreme Court Procedures

  2020cites this paper
• Curbing the Court

  2020cites this paper
• Public Views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Aftermath of the Kavanaugh Confirmation

  2020cites this paper
• "Is anyone worried about judicial review?" Attitudes towards judicial review in an era of political turmoil

  2020influential citation
• An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric on Perceptions of Judicial Legitimacy

  2020cites this paper
• General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing

  2020cites this paper
• The Guardians of Judicial Independence

  2020cites this paper
• Presidential Calls to Congress

  2020cites this paper
• Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence

  2020cites this paper
• Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing

  2020cites this paper
• Index

  2020cites this paper
• Preface

  2020cites this paper
• Going Public on Supreme Court Cases before the Modern Presidency

  2020cites this paper
• Notes

  2020cites this paper
• Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning

  2020cites this paper
• References

  2020cites this paper
• Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing

  2020cites this paper
• Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing

  2020cites this paper
• Index

  2020cites this paper
• How Identity Politics Polarizes Rule of Law Opinions

  2020cites this paper
• The Limits of Partisan Loyalty

  2019cites this paper
• Group Identification and Support for the Supreme Court: Evidence from Evangelical Protestants

  2019cites this paper
• The Causes of the Legitimacy-Conferring and Republican Schoolmaster Capabilities of Courts

  2019cites this paper
• Naming Names: The Impact of Supreme Court Opinion Attribution on Citizen Assessment of Policy Outcomes

  2019influential citation
• Compensation and Compliance: Sources of Public Acceptance of the U.K. Supreme Court's Brexit Decision

  2019cites this paper
• How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

  2019cites this paper
• Judging Judicial Review in the American States

  2019cites this paper
• Polarization and the Judiciary

  2019cites this paper
• The President and the Supreme Court

  2019cites this paper
• Presidential Rhetoric and U.S. Supreme Court Rulings: The Effect of Going Public on Citizen Evaluations of Institutions and Policy

  2019cites this paper
• Causal Effects of Judicial Sentiment: Methods and Application to U.S. Circuit Courts

  2019cites this paper
• Do Judicial Sentiments Affect Social Attitudes?

  2019cites this paper
• Does Public Support for Judicial Power Depend on Who is in Political Power? Testing a Theory of Partisan Alignment in Africa

  2019cites this paper