Do banks price the risk of stranded fossil fuel reserves? To address this question, we hand collect global data on corporate fossil fuel reserves from 2002 to 2016, match it with syndicated loans, and subsequently compare the loan rate charged to fossil fuel firms — along their climate policy exposure — to other firms. We find that banks price climate policy exposure, especially after 2015. We also uncover that our main effect further increases for loans with longer maturity, that loan size to fossil fuel firms increases, and that ‛Green’ banks also charge higher loan rates to fossil fuel firms.
Being Stranded with Fossil Fuel Reserves? Climate Policy Risk and the Pricing of Bank loans
M. Delis,Kathrin de Greiff,S. Ongena
Published 2024 in Social Science Research Network
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2024
- Venue
Social Science Research Network
- Publication date
2024-02-01
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
CONCEPTS
- climate policy exposure
A measure of how much a fossil fuel firm is exposed to climate policy risk.
Aliases: climate-policy exposure
- fossil fuel reserves
Corporate holdings of coal, oil, or gas reserves used to identify fossil fuel firms in the sample.
Aliases: corporate fossil fuel reserves
- green banks
Banks characterized in the paper as environmentally oriented or green, used as a lender subgroup.
- loan rates
The interest rate charged on a bank loan, used as the main pricing outcome.
Aliases: loan pricing
- stranded fossil fuel reserves
Fossil fuel reserves that may lose economic value because of climate policy or the energy transition.
Aliases: stranded reserves
- syndicated loans
Loans provided by a group of lenders to a single borrower and used here as the banking outcome data.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-55 of 55 references · Page 1 of 1