Evaluating environmental permitting process duration: the case of clean water act Section 404 permits

Permits are a critical tool for ensuring that infrastructure projects provide the benefits they promise without harming nearby people or the environment. However, the environmental permitting process is complex, often resulting in long review times and increased administrative costs. Identifying ways to hasten permitting processes without compromising environmental rigor is important for enabling efficient and effective infrastructure regulation. This paper evaluates the relationship between permitting duration and characteristics of the projects, applicant organizations, and regulatory regime, using a novel dataset of US Clean Water Act permits. Longer review time was associated with projects proposed by a business (rather than state or federal agencies); using an engineering consultant; requiring some combination of environmental impact analysis, historic preservation, and/or endangered species review; and located in Arizona. Project type, agency workload, and socioeconomic characteristics did not correlate with review time.

• Publication year

  2019

• Venue

  Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

• Publication date

  2019-01-15

• Fields of study

  Law, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1534730
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Evolving State Government Role in Environmental Protection

  2020cited by this paper
• Does collaboration affect the duration of environmental permitting processes?

  2018cited by this paper
• A Framework for Building Efficient Environmental Permitting Processes

  2017influential reference
• An efficient Western Energy Imbalance Market with conflicting carbon policies

  2017cited by this paper
• Section 404 Permit Program

  2015cited by this paper
• Collaboration in Federal Hydropower Licensing: Impacts on Process, Outputs, and Outcomes

  2015cited by this paper
• Streamlining of building permit approval processing of town and country planning department in Ghana

  2015cited by this paper
• Income and Poverty in the United States: 2013

  2014cited by this paper
• Restoration as mitigation: analysis of stream mitigation for coal mining impacts in southern Appalachia.

  2014cited by this paper
• A Tale of Two Sitings: Contentious Politics in Liquefied Natural Gas Facility Siting in California

  2010cited by this paper
• Wind power planning and permitting : comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries

  2010influential reference
• Shifting Interests: Rethinking the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permitting Process and Public Interest Review in Light of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita

  2010cited by this paper
• A Tale of Two Sitings: Contentious Politics and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Facilities in California

  2009cited by this paper
• A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy

  2009cited by this paper
• Income and Poverty

  2007cited by this paper
• Sources of Bureaucratic Delay: A Case Study of FERC Dam Relicensing

  2006cited by this paper
• Environmental permitting as a driver for eco-efficiency in the dairy industry: A closer look at the IPPC directive

  2005cited by this paper
• Corporate Environmentalism and Environmental Statutory Permitting*

  2003influential reference
• Pollution Regulation and Its Effects on Technological Innovations

  2002cited by this paper
• The Economics of Environmental Regulation by Licensing: An Assessment of Recent Changes to the Wetland Permitting Process

  2002cited by this paper
• Section 404 Wetland Mitigation and Permit Success Criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999

  2002cited by this paper
• Reforming Permitting

  2001influential reference
• A quick scan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis

  2000cited by this paper
• Siting Struggles: The Unique Challenge of Permitting Renewable Energy Power Plants

  2000cited by this paper
• Waiting to Be Protected Under the Endangered Species Act: The Political Economy of Regulatory Delay*

  1999cited by this paper
• The Political and Legal Causes of Regulatory Delay in the United States: Four Case Studies of Air Pollution Permitting in the U.S. and Germany

  1999cited by this paper
• Wetland loss and substitution by the Section 404 permit program in southern California, USA

  1996cited by this paper
• Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency

  1993cited by this paper
• Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics

  1983cited by this paper
• Regression Models and Life-Tables

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Expedited desalination permitting enables adaptive planning and water system cost reduction

  2026cites this paper
• Site clearance bottlenecks in Vietnam's ODA-funded infrastructure projects: an FSE-based decision-making model

  2025cites this paper
• Systematic review and mapping of governments’ sustainable initiatives and entrepreneurial expectations

  2025cites this paper
• Quantifying the Value of Technology and Policy Innovation in Water Resource Portfolios

  2024cites this paper
• Toward improved sediment management and coastal resilience through efficient permitting in California

  2023influential citation
• Plants' emission behaviors under dual control of pollutant concentration and quantity.

  2023cites this paper
• Concise or comprehensive? Predictors of impact assessment choices for electric transmission line projects

  2022cites this paper
• Standardizing No Net Loss Stream Mitigation Assessment Methods: Tradeoffs between Expediency and River Science

  2022cites this paper
• Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge in California

  2021cites this paper
• Barriers and opportunities for beneficial reuse of sediment to support coastal resilience

  2020cites this paper
• NEPA and National Trends in Federal Infrastructure Siting in the United States

  2020cites this paper
• Barriers and Opportunities for Beneficial Reuse of Sediment to

  2020cites this paper