BackgroundDespite the continuous production of genome sequence for a number of organisms, reliable, comprehensive, and cost effective gene prediction remains problematic. This is particularly true for genomes for which there is not a large collection of known gene sequences, such as the recently published chicken genome. We used the chicken sequence to test comparative and homology-based gene-finding methods followed by experimental validation as an effective genome annotation method.ResultsWe performed experimental evaluation by RT-PCR of three different computational gene finders, Ensembl, SGP2 and TWINSCAN, applied to the chicken genome. A Venn diagram was computed and each component of it was evaluated. The results showed that de novo comparative methods can identify up to about 700 chicken genes with no previous evidence of expression, and can correctly extend about 40% of homology-based predictions at the 5' end.ConclusionsDe novo comparative gene prediction followed by experimental verification is effective at enhancing the annotation of the newly sequenced genomes provided by standard homology-based methods.
Gene finding in the chicken genome
Eduardo Eyras,Alexandre Reymond,R. Castelo,J. Bye,Francisco Camara,P. Flicek,E. Huckle,Genís Parra,David D. Shteynberg,Carine Wyss,J. Rogers,S. Antonarakis,E. Birney,R. Guigó,Michael R. Brent
Published 2005 in BMC Bioinformatics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2005
- Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
- Publication date
2005-05-30
- Fields of study
Biology, Medicine, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-34 of 34 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-40 of 40 citing papers · Page 1 of 1