Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research

In this introduction to the special issue on methodology, we provide background on its original motivation and a systematic overview of the contributions. The latter are discussed with correspondence to the phase of the scientific process they (most strongly) refer to: Theory construction, design, data analysis, and cumulative development of scientific knowledge. Several contributions propose novel measurement techniques and paradigms that will allow for new insights and can thus avail researchers in JDM and beyond. Another set of contributions centers around how models can best be tested and/or compared. Especially when viewed in combination, the papers on this topic spell out vital necessities for model comparisons and provide approaches that solve noteworthy problems prior work has been faced with.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Judgment and Decision Making

• Publication date

  2011-12-01

• Fields of study

  Business, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/s1930297500004137
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Judgment and decision making.

  2012cited by this paper
• Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?

  2011cited by this paper
• Transitivity of preferences.

  2011cited by this paper
• Homo heuristicus Outnumbered: Comment on Gigerenzer and Brighton (2009)

  2011cited by this paper
• Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology

  2011cited by this paper
• A shift in strategy or “error”? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications

  2011cited by this paper
• Herbert Simon’s spell on judgment and decision making

  2011cited by this paper
• Towards Competitive Instead of Biased Testing of Heuristics: A Reply to Hilbig and Richter (2011)

  2011cited by this paper
• Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process

  2011cited by this paper
• False-Positive Psychology

  2011cited by this paper
• Applying the decision moving window to risky choice: Comparison of eye-tracking and mouse-tracing methods

  2011cited by this paper
• The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making

  2011cited by this paper
• Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Why Psychologists Must Change the Way They Analyze Their Data : The Case of Psi : Comment on Bem ( 2011 )

  2011cited by this paper
• Diagnostic Task Selection for Strategy Classification in Judgment and Decision Making: Theory, Validation, and Implementation in R

  2011cited by this paper
• Methodological notes on model comparisons and strategy classification: A falsificationist proposition

  2011cited by this paper
• When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms

  2011cited by this paper
• New designs for research in delay discounting

  2011cited by this paper
• Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making

  2011cited by this paper
• Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?

  2011cited by this paper
• Pair-wise comparisons of multiple models

  2011cited by this paper
• Strengths and Limitations of Theoretical Explanations in Psychology

  2011cited by this paper
• Introduction to Special Section on Bayesian Data Analysis

  2011cited by this paper
• Measuring Social Value Orientation

  2011cited by this paper
• The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies

  2011cited by this paper
• The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic

  2011cited by this paper
• What might judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing?

  2011cited by this paper
• A model-based approach for the analysis of the calibration of probability judgments

  2011cited by this paper
• Who is afraid of reviewers’ comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited

  2010cited by this paper
• Implementation of the multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification in R

  2010cited by this paper
• How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic

  2010influential reference
• Reconsidering “evidence” for fast-and-frugal heuristics

  2010cited by this paper
• Five Principles for Studying People's Use of Heuristics

  2010cited by this paper
• Behavioral Econometrics for Psychologists

  2010cited by this paper
• Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: Addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application

  2010cited by this paper
• Weird people, yes, but also weird experiments

  2010cited by this paper
• Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.683 A Choice Prediction Competition: Choices from Experience and from Description

  2010cited by this paper
• Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis

  2009cited by this paper
• The Theory of Reasoned Action

  2009cited by this paper
• Dimension integration: Testing models without trade-offs

  2008cited by this paper
• New tests of cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic: Probability-outcome tradeoff with branch splitting

  2008cited by this paper
• Do People Make Decisions Under Risk Based on Ignorance? An Empirical Test of the Priority Heuristic Against Cumulative Prospect Theory

  2008cited by this paper
• Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006).

  2008cited by this paper
• One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic

  2008cited by this paper
• Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?

  2007cited by this paper
• A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values

  2007cited by this paper
• Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.

  2007cited by this paper
• Continuous Dynamics in Real-Time Cognition

  2006cited by this paper
• The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs.

  2006cited by this paper
• Re-visions of rationality?

  2005cited by this paper
• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2005cited by this paper
• Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: surprising insights from Bayes's theorem.

  2003cited by this paper
• Bayesian strategy assessment in multi‐attribute decision making

  2003cited by this paper
• The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation.

  1999cited by this paper
• Surrogates for Theories

  1998cited by this paper
• A different perspective

  1997cited by this paper
• Gergen Versus the Mainstream: Are Hypotheses in Social Psychology Subject to Empirical Test?

  1994cited by this paper
• On the Testability of Psychological Generalizations (Psychological Testability)

  1991cited by this paper

• Some Metatheoretical Reflections on Adaptive Decision Making and the Strategy Selection Problem

  2018cites this paper
• Rationality and Psychological Accuracy of Risky Choice Models Based on Option- vs. Dimension-Wise Evaluations

  2014cites this paper
• Psychologists Are Open to Change, yet Wary of Rules

  2012cites this paper
• The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making

  2011cites this paper
• New designs for research in delay discounting

  2011cites this paper