Who is afraid of reviewers’ comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  European Journal of Clinical Investigation

• Publication date

  2010-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02272.xPMID 20486989
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network

  2009cited by this paper
• BRIEF COMMUNICATION The Decline in the Concentration of Citations, 1900-2007

  2009cited by this paper
• Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity.

  2008cited by this paper
• Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

  2008cited by this paper
• The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007

  2008cited by this paper
• Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system

  2008cited by this paper
• In Search of Peer Reviewers

  2008cited by this paper
• Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

  2008cited by this paper
• Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship

  2008cited by this paper
• Does self-citation pay?

  2007cited by this paper
• A Descriptive Analysis of Authorship Within Medical Journals, 1995–2005

  2007cited by this paper
• Academic Editor: Richard Hornung, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital, United States of America

  2007cited by this paper
• From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal.

  2006cited by this paper
• Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

  2006cited by this paper
• Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems

  2006cited by this paper
• F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

  2005cited by this paper
• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

  2005cited by this paper
• A macro study of self-citation

  2003cited by this paper
• The accuracy of citation and quotation in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery journals.

  2000cited by this paper
• A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades.

  1999cited by this paper
• When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.

  1997cited by this paper
• The quality of citations in major international obstetrics and gynecology journals.

  1997cited by this paper
• The quality of citations in major international obstetrics and gynecology journals

  1997cited by this paper
• Reference citations in radiology: accuracy and appropriateness of use in two major journals.

  1994cited by this paper
• Publishing by--and for?--the numbers.

  1990cited by this paper
• Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.

  1986cited by this paper

• Negotiating the path to publication: Functional units and lexical bundles in author responses to peer review

  2025cites this paper
• On the Thorny Issue of Single Submission

  2024cites this paper
• Complications Connected to Using the Impact Factor of Journals for the Assessment of Researchers in Higher Education

  2021cites this paper
• Self-Citation, Cumulative Advantage, and Gender Inequality in Science

  2020cites this paper
• Peer Review and Transparency in Evidence-Source Selection in Value and Health Technology Assessment.

  2020cites this paper
• Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

  2019cites this paper
• A bibliometric analysis of 20 years of research on software product lines

  2016cites this paper
• Reproductive Health Abstracts (2004-2010) What Gets Published?.

  2016cites this paper
• A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation.

  2015cites this paper
• Science as a Social Enterprise

  2015cites this paper
• Statistically Non-significant Papers in Environmental Health Studies included more Outcome Variables.

  2015cites this paper
• Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study.

  2015cites this paper
• Epidemiologic research with administrative databases: red herrings, false alarms and pseudo-epidemics.

  2015cites this paper
• How to review a scientific paper.

  2014cites this paper
• Gatekeepers, Guardians and Allies

  2014cites this paper
• Biomedical journals lack a consistent method to detect outcome reporting bias: a cross‐sectional analysis

  2014cites this paper
• Selecting Your Editorial Board: Maintaining Standards

  2013cites this paper
• Sixty years of Acta Biochimica Polonica: what can this journal offer to scientists?

  2013cites this paper
• Drug Firms, the Codification of Diagnostic Categories, and Bias in Clinical Guidelines

  2013cites this paper
• Reliability of Reviewer Ratings in the Manuscript Peer Review Process: An Opportunity for Improvement

  2013cites this paper
• Intervention Effectiveness Research in Adolescent Health Psychology: Methodological Issues and Strategies

  2013cites this paper
• High-risk prostate cancer in the modern era: does a single standard of care exist?

  2013cites this paper
• The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study

  2013cites this paper
• Suomalainen julkaisuaktiivisuus psykiatrian alan ydinlehdissä vuosina 2001-2010

  2013cites this paper
• Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web

  2012cites this paper
• Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals

  2012cites this paper
• Establishing a new journal for systematic review products

  2012cites this paper
• The Internet for neurosurgeons: current resources and future challenges

  2011cites this paper
• Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research

  2011cites this paper
• Impact Factor and other metrics for evaluating science: essentials for public health practitioners

  2011cites this paper
• Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

  2010cites this paper