Why conserve biodiversity? A multi-national exploration of stakeholders’ views on the arguments for biodiversity conservation

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Biodiversity and Conservation

• Publication date

  2018-06-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1173-z
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis

  2015cited by this paper
• Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction

  2015cited by this paper
• Harmonizing OPERAs voices : an investigation of different perspectives on the ecosystem services concept and their implications for research and practice

  2014cited by this paper
• Should conservation of biodiversity involve private land? A Q methodological study in Poland to assess stakeholders’ attitude

  2014cited by this paper
• Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology

  2014cited by this paper
• Quantifying Human Subjectivity Using Q Method: When Quality Meets Quantity

  2014cited by this paper
• Changes in the global value of ecosystem services

  2014cited by this paper
• Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations: Application of a photo-based Q-method in Transylvania (Central Romania)

  2014cited by this paper
• Doing Q-methodological research: theory, method and interpretation

  2014cited by this paper
• Does expertise matter? An in-depth understanding of people’s structure of thoughts on nature and its management implications

  2013cited by this paper
• Humans and Nature: How Knowing and Experiencing Nature Affect Well-Being

  2013cited by this paper
• Report on the classification of arguments and the provisional framework

  2013cited by this paper
• To value or not to value? That is not the question

  2013cited by this paper
• The Value of Biodiversity

  2013cited by this paper
• On the use of imagery for climate change engagement

  2013cited by this paper
• Farmers' perceptions of biodiversity: Lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study

  2013influential reference
• Environmental discourses and biodiversity: the construction of a storyline in understanding and managing an environmental issue

  2013cited by this paper
• When the future of biodiversity depends on researchers’ and stakeholders’ thought-styles

  2013cited by this paper
• Strengthening the case for saproxylic arthropod conservation: a call for ecosystem services research

  2013cited by this paper
• Assessing the relevance of stakeholder analysis for national ecological network governance: The case of the Green Network in Estonia

  2013cited by this paper
• Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity

  2012cited by this paper
• The Socio-cultural Context of Ecosystem and Biodiversity Valuation

  2012cited by this paper
• Human Perspectives and Conservation of Grizzly Bears in Banff National Park, Canada

  2012cited by this paper
• Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation

  2012influential reference
• Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: Why put economic values on Nature?

  2011cited by this paper
• The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations

  2011influential reference
• Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services

  2011cited by this paper
• THE ROLE OF ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT

  2011cited by this paper
• Expansion of Nature Conservation Areas: Problems with Natura 2000 Implementation in Poland?

  2010influential reference
• Obscuring Ecosystem Function with Application of the Ecosystem Services Concept

  2010cited by this paper
• Motivations for Conserving Urban Biodiversity

  2010influential reference
• Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder

  2010cited by this paper
• Socio-cultural context of ecosystem and biodiversity valuation

  2010cited by this paper
• Value Plurality among Conservation Professionals

  2010cited by this paper
• Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being

  2010cited by this paper
• Valuation of Biodiversity ‐ A NERC scoping study

  2009cited by this paper
• Analysing the Development of Small-Scale Forestry in Central and Eastern Europe

  2009cited by this paper
• Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation

  2008cited by this paper
• Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review

  2008cited by this paper
• People and biodiversity policies : impacts, issues and strategies for policy action

  2008cited by this paper
• Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: Understanding public representations of biodiversity

  2008cited by this paper
• Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: Implications for biodiversity management and conservation

  2007cited by this paper
• Ecosystem‐Service Science and the Way Forward for Conservation

  2007cited by this paper
• Selling out on nature

  2006cited by this paper
• Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA

  2006influential reference
• The subjective experience of partnership love: a Q Methodological study.

  2005cited by this paper
• Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis

  2005influential reference
• Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management

  2005cited by this paper
• Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values.

  2002cited by this paper
• Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia1

  2001cited by this paper
• Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia 1

  2001cited by this paper
• Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense?

  2001cited by this paper
• The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value

  2000cited by this paper
• Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology

  1999cited by this paper
• Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation

  1997cited by this paper
• Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and the Boundaries of Politics in American Thought

  1997cited by this paper
• Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities

  1997cited by this paper
• Q methodology.

  1997cited by this paper
• Rethinking Methods in Psychology

  1995cited by this paper
• A Primer on Q Methodology

  1993cited by this paper
• Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction

  1992cited by this paper
• Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science.

  1980cited by this paper

• Enlisting Biodiversity: Steering Public Discourse to Win Support for Policies on Biodiversity Challenges

  2026cites this paper
• Assessing the Vegetation Diversity of Different Forest Ecosystems in Southern Romania Using Biodiversity Indices and Similarity Coefficients

  2025cites this paper
• Online training module to reduce stigma and improve knowledge about autism in pre-service teachers: Cross-cultural comparison of Hong Kong and Canada

  2025cites this paper
• “Nature cannot always win” – A Q study on stakeholder perceptions on biodiversity offsetting

  2025cites this paper
• Farmers'perceived financial and non-financial costs of their biodiversity measures – Exploring viewpoints with Q-methodology

  2025cites this paper
• Public perceptions of biodiversity and the value of its conservation

  2025cites this paper
• A stakeholder analysis based on project managers’ perceptions: Unlocking transformative potential in Natura 2000 projects

  2025cites this paper
• Q methodology and environmental social science: adapting Q for complexity and inclusion in environmental justice research

  2025cites this paper
• Biodiversity conservation indicators and conflict management: Application of environmental expert-based approach in Romania

  2024cites this paper
• Exploring the extents of genetic diversity and population structure of enset [Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) cheesman] from southern Ethiopia using simple sequence repeat markers: Implications for crop improvement and conservation

  2024cites this paper
• Conservation and threatened status of plant species with extremely small populations in the karst region of southeastern Yunnan, China

  2024cites this paper
• On the intrinsic value of diversity

  2024cites this paper
• Biodiversity and carbon stocks of the understory vegetation as indicators for forest health in the Zabarwan Mountain Range, Indian Western Himalaya

  2024cites this paper
• The chromosome-scale genome of Magnolia sinica (Magnoliaceae) provides insights into the conservation of plant species with extremely small populations (PSESP)

  2024cites this paper
• The use and potential of Q method in environmental planning and management

  2023cites this paper
• Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values

  2023influential citation
• Finding hope and fulfillment in meaningful work: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of conservation and stewardship practitioners’ experience, values, and motivations

  2023cites this paper
• Conservation of parasites: A primer

  2023cites this paper
• Valuing the plant species diversity of permanent grasslands: From the perspective of herders.

  2023cites this paper
• Carbon Stock Availability in Forests of the Zabarwan Mountain Range in Kashmir Himalaya

  2022cites this paper
• Greening the Universe: The Case for Ecocentric Space Expansion Forthcoming in Reclaiming Space: Progressive and Multicultural Visions of Space A universe of weird and beautiful Earths? Does nature possess intrinsic value?

  2022cites this paper
• Temporal and spatial changes of biodiversity in Caverns of Heaven and Places of Blessing, Zhejiang Province, China from 1990 to 2020

  2022cites this paper
• Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders

  2022cites this paper
• The underappreciated value of brownfield sites: motivations and challenges associated with maintaining biodiversity

  2022cites this paper
• Do Sustainability Standards Provide Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Independent Oil Palm Smallholders?

  2022cites this paper
• ‘You can’t be green if you’re in the red’: Local discourses on the production-biodiversity intersection in a mixed farming area in south-eastern Australia

  2022cites this paper
• Nonhuman Value: A Survey of the Intrinsic Valuation of Natural and Artificial Nonhuman Entities

  2022cites this paper
• Children of Trinidad prioritize conservation of species that are important in nature

  2022cites this paper
• The Q approach to consensus building: integrating diverse perspectives to 1 guide decision-making 2

  2022cites this paper
• Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence

  2021cites this paper
• Rewilding and restoring nature in a changing world

  2021cites this paper
• Association of a threatened forest ungulate with the treeless herriza or Mediterranean heathland in southern Spain

  2020cites this paper
• Exploring perspectives in assessing the quality of governance of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) pilot project in Cambodia: Use of Q Methodology

  2020cites this paper
• Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders’ opinions

  2020cites this paper
• A safeguard measure of endemic and endangered plant species: cryostorage of Dianthus taxa

  2020cites this paper
• Impacts and perspectives of woodland creation in upland Cumbria, UK

  2019influential citation
• Modest levels of interpretability of the term ‘biodiversity’, mediated by educational level, among the Australian public

  2019cites this paper
• A 20-year update on the state of seaweed resources in Italy

  2019cites this paper
• Arguments for biodiversity conservation: factors influencing their observed effectiveness in European case studies

  2018cites this paper
• The missing pillar: Eudemonic values in the justification of nature conservation

  2018cites this paper
• Biodiversity of the African savanna woodlands : how does it change with land use?

  2018cites this paper
• Exploring Current and Future Situation of Mediterranean Silvopastoral Systems: Case Study in Southern Spain☆

  2018cites this paper
• Making a better case for biodiversity conservation: the BESAFE project

  2018cites this paper
• Seizing opportunities to diversify conservation

  2018cites this paper
• Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice

  2017cites this paper
• Hungary THREE SIDES OF THE SAME COIN? THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL

  2017cites this paper
• Caught Between Personal and Collective Values: Biodiversity conservation in European decision-making

  2017cites this paper
• Three sides of the same coin? The main directions of the environmental movement

  2017cites this paper
• When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning

  2017cites this paper
• Offshore renewable energy and nature conservation: the case of marine tidal turbines in Northern Ireland

  2016cites this paper