Abstract There are numerous studies analysing factors of success in media-broadcasted artistic contests, especially music competitions. However, one factor that is generally neglected in the literature is the quality of the artistic performances (i.e. ‘music quality’). In this paper, we approach this research gap by developing two novel concepts of music quality and by employing unique measures during the empirical analysis of a popular German music television contest in order to analyse how different dimensions of the music and performance quality influences the final voting results. We use the complete historical voting dataset of the music contest from its inception in 2005 until its last broadcast in 2015, collecting 2,816 observations in total. First, we define dimensions of ‘objective quality’ according to insights from musicological research/literature. Second, we conceptualise dimensions of ‘subjective quality’ because music preferences may be subjective and are not necessarily based on how experts’ define ‘good’ music. We measure these subjective dimensions in an experimental setting with students from two German universities. Our analysis shows that different quality dimensions affect the outcome of voting results in different ways and not all quality dimensions reveal themselves as significant. In general, subjective quality dimensions turn out to be more relevant than objective ones. The differentiated results of our analysis support the value of our approach to deconstruct quality into different dimensions and test them individually.
Does music quality matter for audience voters in a music contest?
Oliver Budzinski,Marie Kohlschreiber,Björn A. Kuchinke,J. Pannicke
Published 2020 in Creative Industries Journal
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Creative Industries Journal
- Publication date
2020-07-06
- Fields of study
Political Science, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
CONCEPTS
- historical voting dataset
The full contest voting record from 2005 through 2015, consisting of 2,816 observations.
Aliases: complete historical voting dataset
- musicological research
The body of music scholarship used to derive the objective quality dimensions.
Aliases: musicology literature
- objective quality
Dimensions of music quality defined from musicological research as externally grounded criteria for assessing performances.
Aliases: objective music quality
- quality dimensions
Separate facets of music and performance quality that are analyzed individually against voting outcomes.
Aliases: music and performance quality dimensions, dimensions of music quality
- student experiment
The experimental measurement setup using students from two German universities to assess subjective quality dimensions.
Aliases: experimental setting with students from two German universities
- subjective quality
Dimensions of music quality defined through listener preference and measured experimentally with students.
Aliases: subjective music quality
- voting results
The final audience voting outcome used as the dependent result in the analysis.
Aliases: final voting results, voting outcome
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-23 of 23 citing papers · Page 1 of 1