To ensure fulfilling stakeholder wishes, it is crucial to validate the documented requirements. This is often complicated by the fact that the wishes and intentions of different stakeholders are somewhat contradictory, which manifests itself in inconsistent requirements. To aid requirements engineers in identifying and resolving inconsistent requirements, we investigated the usefulness for manual reviews of two different model-based representation formats for inconsistent requirements; one that represent the inconsistent requirements in separate diagrams and one that represents them integrated into one diagram using annotations. The results from a controlled experiment show that the use of such integrated review diagrams can significantly increase efficiency of manual reviews, without sacrificing effectiveness.
On the Impact of the Model-Based Representation of Inconsistencies to Manual Reviews - Results from a Controlled Experiment
Marian Daun,Jennifer Brings,Thorsten Weyer
Published 2017 in International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
- Publication date
2017-07-10
- Fields of study
Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-42 of 42 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-13 of 13 citing papers · Page 1 of 1