What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  European Journal of Pain

• Publication date

  2010-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.04.007PMID 19443246
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change

  2008cited by this paper
• Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Argentinean Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

  2008cited by this paper
• The Short‐Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: Test–retest reliability and responsiveness to change

  2008cited by this paper
• Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness

  2007influential reference
• Minimal Clinically Important Change for Pain Intensity and Disability in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain

  2007cited by this paper
• Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

  2007cited by this paper
• Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

  2007influential reference
• Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Moroccan Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

  2007cited by this paper
• When to use agreement versus reliability measures.

  2006influential reference
• A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain.

  2006cited by this paper
• Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

  2006influential reference
• Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both?

  2006cited by this paper
• Minimal Clinically Important Change for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Health Status in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain

  2006cited by this paper
• Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach

  2006cited by this paper
• Comparison of the Functional Rating Index and the 18-Item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: Responsiveness and Reliability

  2005cited by this paper
• Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

  2005cited by this paper
• Responsiveness of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire: consequences of using different external criteria

  2005cited by this paper
• Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: Which coefficient should be used?

  2004cited by this paper
• 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery.

  2004influential reference
• Concurrent Comparison of Responsiveness in Pain and Functional Status Measurements Used for Patients With Low Back Pain

  2004cited by this paper
• Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement

  2004cited by this paper
• The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain

  2003cited by this paper
• Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

  2003cited by this paper
• On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation

  2003cited by this paper
• Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.

  2003influential reference
• A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

  2002cited by this paper
• Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11‐point numerical pain rating scale

  2001cited by this paper
• REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF EVALUATIVE OUTCOME MEASURES

  2001influential reference
• The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

  2000cited by this paper
• Sensitivity to change.

  1999cited by this paper
• Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1.

  1998cited by this paper
• Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire.

  1998influential reference
• A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients.

  1997cited by this paper
• Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments

  1996cited by this paper
• Assessing Health‐Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sciatica

  1995cited by this paper
• Measuring the Functional Status of Patients With Low Back Pain: Assessment of the Quality of Four Disease-Specific Questionnaires

  1995cited by this paper
• A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients.

  1994cited by this paper
• Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients

  1993cited by this paper
• Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients

  1992cited by this paper
• Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

  1991cited by this paper
• Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

  1989cited by this paper
• Comparative Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile and Shorter Scales for Functional Assessment in Low-Back Pain

  1986cited by this paper
• Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

  1986influential reference
• A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

  1983cited by this paper
• The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure

  1981cited by this paper
• Lumbar disc surgery.

  1977influential reference
• AKUFO AND IBARAPA.

  1965cited by this paper

• Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

  2024cites this paper
• Measurement properties of a computer adaptive device, the Senscoordination 3D Cervical Trainer, to assess cervical range of motion in people with neck pain.

  2023cites this paper
• Reliability, Measurement Error, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Change of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale 2.0 for Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

  2023cites this paper
• Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Hindi Version of the Neck Disability Index in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

  2023cites this paper
• Development and Validation of the Cognitive Behavior Questionnaire in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (CBQ-NSCLBP)

  2023cites this paper
• Roland-Morris disability questionnaire is bidimensional and has 16 items when applied to community-dwelling older adults with low back pain

  2022cites this paper
• Reliability and Responsiveness of the Observable Movement Quality Scale for Children with Mild to Moderate Motor Impairments

  2020cites this paper
• Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

  2020cites this paper
• One-minute stair climbing, 50-foot walk, and timed up-and-go were responsive measures for patients with chronic low back pain undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

  2019cites this paper
• The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change in Women With Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain, Low Back Pain, or Both

  2017cites this paper
• Is my patient actually getting better? Application of the McNemar test for demonstrating the change at a single subject level

  2017cites this paper
• Graded exposure bij chronische lage rugklachten

  2017cites this paper
• The Responsiveness and Interpretability of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

  2017cites this paper
• Responsiveness and minimum important change of the Oswestry Disability Index in Italian subjects with symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis

  2017cites this paper
• Smallest worthwhile effect of exercise programs to prevent falls among older people: estimates from benefit-harm trade-off and discrete choice methods.

  2016cites this paper
• Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Short Forms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

  2016cites this paper
• Item Response Theory Analysis of the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Population-Based Study

  2015cites this paper
• Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention.

  2015cites this paper
• Responsiveness and Interpretability of the Portuguese Version of the Neck Disability Index in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Undergoing Physiotherapy.

  2015cites this paper
• Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients.

  2014cites this paper
• Influence of foot orthotics upon duration of effects of spinal manipulation in chronic back pain patients: a randomized clinical trial.

  2014cites this paper
• The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index

  2014cites this paper
• A Systematic Review of Head-to-Head Comparison Studies of the Roland-Morris and Oswestry Measures' Abilities to Assess Change.

  2013cites this paper
• Meta-analysis identifies Back Pain Questionnaire reliability influenced more by instrument than study design or population.

  2013cites this paper
• Extensive Validation of the Pain Disability Index in 3 Groups of Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain

  2013cites this paper
• Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Simplified Chinese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

  2012cites this paper
• A Double-Blind Controlled Trial of a Single Dose Naproxen and an Amino Acid Medical Food Theramine for the Treatment of Low Back Pain

  2012cites this paper
• A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain.

  2012influential citation
• DIJAGNOSTIKA I KONZERVATIVNO LIJEČENJE KRIŽOBOLJE: PREGLED I SMJERNICE HRVATSKOG VERTEBROLOŠKOG DRUŠTVA

  2012cites this paper
• Acute Low Back Pain and Primary Care: How to Define Recovery and Chronification?

  2011cites this paper
• Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)

  2011cites this paper
• Assessing Dimensionality and Responsiveness of Outcomes Measures for Patients with Low Back Pain

  2011influential citation
• Psychometric Characteristics of the Korean Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

  2011influential citation
• Are We Making Progress?: The Tenth International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain

  2011cites this paper
• A modified Roland–Morris disability scale for the assessment of sciatica

  2010cites this paper
• Triggerpunktbehandlung bei Karpaltunnelsyndrom

  2010cites this paper
• Performance Tests in People With Chronic Low Back Pain: Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change

  2010cites this paper
• The lower limb tasks questionnaire: is it useful in the assessment of function in low back pain sufferers?

  2010cites this paper
• ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Amharic version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia

  year unknowncites this paper