Item Response Theory Analysis of the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Population-Based Study

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Spine

• Publication date

  2015-03-15

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000764PMID 25774468PMCID PMC9923782
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain.

  2014cited by this paper
• Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

  2014cited by this paper
• Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

  2014cited by this paper
• What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire?

  2010cited by this paper
• About Scientific Software

  2010cited by this paper
• The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain.

  2009cited by this paper
• Measuring Outcomes in Back Care

  2007cited by this paper
• Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire

  2007cited by this paper
• Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

  2005cited by this paper
• Outcomes Measurement for Patients With Low Back Pain

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessment of self-reported physical activity in patients with chronic pain: development of an abbreviated Roland-Morris disability scale.

  2004cited by this paper
• Predicting gender differences as latent variables: summed scores, and individual item responses: a methods case study

  2004cited by this paper
• Concurrent Comparison of Responsiveness in Pain and Functional Status Measurements Used for Patients With Low Back Pain

  2004cited by this paper
• Item Response Theory for Items Scored in Two Categories

  2001cited by this paper
• The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

  2000cited by this paper
• Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.

  2000cited by this paper
• The Oswestry Disability Index.

  2000cited by this paper
• A Cross‐sectional Study Comparing the Oswestry and Roland‐Morris Functional Disability Scales in Two Populations of Patients With Low Back Pain of Different Levels of Severity

  1997cited by this paper
• Assessing Health‐Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sciatica

  1995cited by this paper
• Care‐Seeking Among Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain

  1995cited by this paper
• Multilog: Multiple, Categorical Item Analysis and Test Scoring Using Item Response Theory

  1994cited by this paper
• Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit

  1992cited by this paper
• Parameter Recovery in the Graded Response Model Using MULTILOG

  1990cited by this paper
• Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

  1990cited by this paper
• TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTS

  1984cited by this paper

• A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain.

  2018cites this paper
• The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire: one or more dimensions?

  2017cites this paper
• Item response theory analysis to evaluate reliability and minimal clinically important change of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in patients with severe disability due to back pain from vertebral compression fractures.

  2017cites this paper
• Mining Branching Rules from Past Survey Data with an Illustration Using a Geriatric Assessment Survey for Older Adults with Cancer

  2016cites this paper