Testing the limits of the ‘joint account’ model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Journal of Medical Ethics

• Publication date

  2014-06-25

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1136/medethics-2014-102142PMID 24965717
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Testing the limits of the ‘joint account’ model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment

  2014cited by this paper
• Caring and the Law

  2013cited by this paper
• Disclosure of genetic information to relatives in Israel: between privacy and familial responsibility

  2012cited by this paper
• Welfare means relationality, virtue and altruism

  2012cited by this paper
• “Please Don’t Tell Me”

  2011cited by this paper
• Confidentiality and sharing genetic information with relatives.

  2010cited by this paper
• F1 designed to save lives.

  2010cited by this paper
• Between the individual and the community: the impact of genetics on ethical models

  2009cited by this paper
• Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law

  2009cited by this paper
• “Am I my genes?”: Questions of identity among individuals confronting genetic disease

  2009cited by this paper
• Head to Head: Should families own genetic information? No

  2007cited by this paper
• Communication of Genetic Information within Families: The Case for Familial Comity

  2006cited by this paper
• Genetic information: a joint account?

  2004cited by this paper
• Genetic information and the family: are we our brother's keeper?

  2002cited by this paper
• Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism.

  1999cited by this paper
• Good Medical Practice

  1998cited by this paper
• General Medical Council

  1920cited by this paper

• Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)

  2023cites this paper
• Who Counts as Family: A Pluralistic Account of Family in the Genetic Context

  2022cites this paper
• Evidence to Support the Clinical Utility of Prenatal Exome Sequencing in Evaluation of the Fetus with Congenital Anomalies

  2021cites this paper
• Clinical utility of exome sequencing in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies: A Review.

  2018cites this paper
• Striking a balance: resolving conflicts between the duty of confidentiality and duties to third parties in genetics

  2018cites this paper
• Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research?

  2017cites this paper
• Genetic testing in clinical practice : An ethical perspective

  2017cites this paper
• The Passive Patient and Disclosure of Genetic Information: Can English Tort Law Protect the Relatives’ Right to Know?

  2016cites this paper
• ‘Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that.’ Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine

  2016cites this paper
• Non-disclosure of genetic risks

  2016cites this paper
• Waxing and Waning: The Shifting Sands of Autonomy on the Medico-Legal Shore

  2015cites this paper
• Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research

  2015cites this paper
• Putting It into Practice

  2015cites this paper
• Testing the limits of the ‘joint account’ model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment

  2014cites this paper