Lothian and borders large bowel cancer project: Immediate outcome after surgery. The consultant surgeons and pathologists of the lothian and borders health boards

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1995

• Venue

  British Journal of Surgery

• Publication date

  1995-07-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/BJS.1800820709PMID 7648097
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

  1996cited by this paper
• Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

  1993cited by this paper
• Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.

  1991cited by this paper
• Carcinoma of the rectum: A 10‐year experience

  1991cited by this paper
• Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture

  1984cited by this paper
• Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer

  1980cited by this paper
• Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.

  1980cited by this paper

• Does practice make perfect? The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on complications after intra-abdominal procedures.

  2024cites this paper
• Which Volume Matters More? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital vs Surgeon Volume in Intra-Abdominal Emergency Surgery.

  2023cites this paper
• MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION VERSUS NO BOWEL PREPARATION BEFORE COLORECTAL SURGERY : A COMPARATIVE STUDY

  2018cites this paper
• Value-based healthcare in colorectal cancer surgery : improving quality and reducing costs

  2017cites this paper
• Nationwide Outcomes Measurement in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Improving Quality and Reducing Costs.

  2016cites this paper
• Reducing Healthcare Costs Facilitated by Surgical Auditing: A Systematic Review

  2015cites this paper
• Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference.

  2014cites this paper
• Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference

  2014cites this paper
• Investigating Time Lags and Attribution in the Translation of Cancer Research: A Case Study Approach.

  2014cites this paper
• Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before colorectal surgery: A randomized prospective trial in a tertiary care institute

  2014cites this paper
• Palliative Surgical Approaches for Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.

  2012cites this paper
• The examination of lymph nodes followingsurgery for colorectal cancer

  2011cites this paper
• The Rate of Abdominoperineal Resections for Rectal Cancer in the State of Victoria, Australia: A Population-Based Study

  2010cites this paper
• Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2010cites this paper
• Potential hospital cost-savings attributed to improvements in outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery following self-audit

  2010cites this paper
• Postoperative Complications Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer

  2010cites this paper
• The National Bowel Cancer Audit: the risks and benefits of moving to open reporting of clinical outcomes

  2009cites this paper
• Management of carcinoma of the rectum

  2008cites this paper
• Is a minor clinical anastomotic leak clinically significant after resection of colorectal cancer?

  2007cites this paper
• Reoperation as a Quality Indicator in Colorectal Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis

  2007cites this paper
• Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence Part 2: Long‐term outcome

  2007cites this paper
• COLORECTAL RESECTION IN PERIPHERAL NEW ZEALAND: WORKLOAD, OUTCOMES AND ITS FUTURE

  2007cites this paper
• Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short‐term outcome

  2007cites this paper
• Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short‐term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery

  2007cites this paper
• The influence of the surgeon's and the hospital's caseload on survival and local recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery.

  2006cites this paper
• Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery.

  2005cites this paper
• Relationship Between Surgeon Caseload and Sphincter Preservation in Patients With Rectal Cancer

  2005cites this paper
• Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia

  2005cites this paper
• Emergency surgery for colonic cancer in a defined population

  2005cites this paper
• Management and prognosis of colon cancer in patients with intestinal obstruction or peritonitis: a French population-based study.

  2005cites this paper
• The influence of training level and surgical experience on survival in colorectal cancer

  2004cites this paper
• Emergency general surgery and the implications for specialisation.

  2004cites this paper
• Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models.

  2004cites this paper
• Assessment of outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in the elderly as a rationale for screening and early detection

  2004cites this paper
• Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer

  2004cites this paper
• Model for collecting colorectal cancer staging information in Western Australia

  2004cites this paper
• Kolon- und Rektumkarzinom

  2004cites this paper
• Follow-Up after Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

  2003cites this paper
• The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology.

  2002cites this paper
• Early postoperative results of surgery for rectal carcinoma as a function of the distance of the tumor from the anal verge: results of a multicenter prospective evaluation

  2002cites this paper
• Complications after colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation.

  2002cites this paper
• Relation entre volume d’activité et résultats du chirurgien : mythe ou réalité ?

  2002cites this paper
• [Relation between activity volume and surgeon's results: myth or reality?].

  2002cites this paper
• Developments and quality assurance in rectal cancer surgery.

  2002cites this paper
• Elective resection and anastomosis for colorectal cancer: A prospective audit of mortality and morbidity 1976−1998

  2002cites this paper
• The influence of a colorectal service on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer

  2002cites this paper
• A multicentre retrospective audit of outcome of patients undergoing curative resection for rectal cancer.

  2002cites this paper
• The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal.

  2002cites this paper
• Psychomotor ability testing and human reliability analysis (HRA) in surgical practice.

  2001cites this paper
• Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in a model of colonic wound healing in a rabbit

  2001cites this paper
• Standards of documentation of the surgeon—patient consultation in current surgical practice

  2001cites this paper
• Effect of caseload on the short-term outcome of colon surgery: results of a multicenter study

  2001cites this paper
• The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

  2001cites this paper
• Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer.

  2001cites this paper
• Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer

  2001cites this paper
• Komplikationen und Mißerfolge in der Chirurgie: Was ist zu tun?

  2000cites this paper
• Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review

  2000cites this paper
• Continuing Medical Education

  2000cites this paper
• A bold message for the next millennium

  2000cites this paper
• Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group.

  2000cites this paper
• Management of synchronous infrarenal aortic disease and large bowel cancer: a North-east of Scotland experience.

  2000cites this paper
• Outcome in patients with colorectal cancer managed by surgical trainees

  1999cites this paper
• Colorectal cancer: is the surgeon a prognostic factor?: A systematic review

  1999cites this paper
• Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer

  1999cites this paper
• Use of the greater omentum in colorectal surgery

  1999cites this paper
• [Management of colorectal cancer in Australian hospitals. Twenty four years' experience].

  1999cites this paper
• Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.

  1999cites this paper
• Tube caecostomy to protect rectal anastomoses

  1998cites this paper
• [Therapeutic choices for cancer of the rectum: discussion and update of the consensus conference].

  1998cites this paper
• Avoidable deaths still occur after large bowel surgery

  1998cites this paper
• Management of colorectal cancer.

  1998cites this paper
• Role of matrix metalloproteinases in healing of colonic anastomosis

  1997cites this paper
• Expandable metal stent application in obstructing carcinoma of the proximal colon

  1997cites this paper
• Trends in survival from colonic cancer: the impact of subspecialization.

  1997cites this paper
• Lothian surgical audit: a 15-year experience of improvement in surgical practice through regional computerised audit.

  1997cites this paper
• Standards in the Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma: A German View

  1997cites this paper
• Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by non‐specialist surgeons

  1997cites this paper
• Colorectal resection in Victoria:a comparison of hospital based and individual audit.

  1996cites this paper
• Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

  1996cites this paper
• The influence of surgeon case volume on outcome in site-specific cancer surgery.

  1996cites this paper