Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence Part 2: Long‐term outcome

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Colorectal Disease

• Publication date

  2007-01-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01095.xPMID 17181844
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short‐term outcome

  2007cited by this paper
• Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994–99

  2005cited by this paper
• Effect of hospital caseload on long‐term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level

  2005cited by this paper
• Surgical Volume and Long-Term Survival Following Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health-Care System

  2004cited by this paper
• Penile and clitoral stimulation for faecal incontinence: external application of a bipolar electrode for patients with faecal incontinence

  2004cited by this paper
• Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study.

  2004cited by this paper
• Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer

  2004cited by this paper
• Association of Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes in Patients with Colon Cancer at High Risk for Recurrence

  2003cited by this paper
• Hospital volume and surgical outcomes for elderly patients with colorectal cancer in the United States.

  2003cited by this paper
• Does Practice Really Make Perfect?

  2003cited by this paper
• Toward Lowering Morbidity, Mortality, and Stoma Formation in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: The Role of Specialization

  2003cited by this paper
• Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.

  2003cited by this paper
• Inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer: a comparison of the impact of deprivation, treatment, and host factors on observed and cause specific survival

  2003cited by this paper
• Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection

  2003cited by this paper
• Influence of Surgical Subspecialty Training on In-Hospital Mortality for Gastrectomy and Colectomy Patients

  2003cited by this paper
• Management of colorectal cancer: variations in practice in one hospital.

  2003cited by this paper
• Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

  2003cited by this paper
• Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: a decision analysis.

  2003cited by this paper
• Surgical Technique and Survival in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Colon Cancer

  2003cited by this paper
• Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer.

  2003cited by this paper
• Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.

  2003cited by this paper
• What Predicts Serious Complications in Colorectal Cancer Resection?

  2003cited by this paper
• Evidence of the effect of ‘specialization’ on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex

  2003cited by this paper
• Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?

  2003cited by this paper
• The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.

  2002cited by this paper
• Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature

  2002cited by this paper
• Rates of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement Vary Between Surgeons and Predict Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Surgery

  2002cited by this paper
• Are high-volume surgeons and hospitals the most important predictors of in-hospital outcome for colon cancer resection?

  2002cited by this paper
• The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer

  2002cited by this paper
• Surgical specialist registrars can safely perform resections for carcinoma of the rectum.

  2002cited by this paper
• The Implications of Subspecialisation on the Management and Outcome of Surgery for Rectal Carcinoma

  2002cited by this paper
• Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States

  2002cited by this paper
• Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon's training, certification, and experience.

  2002cited by this paper
• The influence of a colorectal service on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer

  2002cited by this paper
• Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer Resection

  2002cited by this paper
• Surgeon Specialty Is Associated With Outcome in Rectal Cancer Treatment

  2002cited by this paper
• Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees

  2001cited by this paper
• Effect of caseload on the short-term outcome of colon surgery: results of a multicenter study

  2001cited by this paper
• Reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer following the introduction of a colorectal unit

  2001cited by this paper
• Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer

  2001cited by this paper
• Impact of surgeon organization and specialization in rectal cancer outcome

  2001cited by this paper
• Use of Surgical Procedures and Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Population-Based Study

  2001cited by this paper
• Adjustments for Center in Multicenter Studies: An Overview

  2001cited by this paper
• Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report.

  2001cited by this paper
• Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population

  2000cited by this paper
• Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.

  2000cited by this paper
• Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery

  2000cited by this paper
• Outcome in patients with colorectal cancer managed by surgical trainees

  1999cited by this paper
• Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma

  1999cited by this paper
• Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

  1999cited by this paper
• Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study.

  1999cited by this paper
• Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.

  1999cited by this paper
• Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer

  1999cited by this paper
• Survival after rectal cancer: differences between hospital catchment areas. A nationwide study in Sweden

  1999cited by this paper
• Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.

  1999cited by this paper
• Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

  1999cited by this paper
• Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

  1998cited by this paper
• Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

  1998cited by this paper
• Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by non‐specialist surgeons

  1997cited by this paper
• Population‐based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions

  1997cited by this paper
• Variations in treatment of rectal cancer

  1997cited by this paper
• Factors affecting survival after excision of the rectum for cancer

  1997cited by this paper
• Trends in survival from colonic cancer: the impact of subspecialization.

  1997cited by this paper
• Survival after colon cancer 1973-1990 in Sweden. Convergence between catchment areas.

  1997cited by this paper
• Influence of hospital‐ and surgeon‐related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy

  1997cited by this paper
• Variations in colon and rectal surgical mortality

  1996cited by this paper
• Lothian and borders large bowel cancer project: Immediate outcome after surgery. The consultant surgeons and pathologists of the lothian and borders health boards

  1995cited by this paper
• Which surgeons in a district general hospital should treat patients with carcinoma of the rectum?

  1995cited by this paper
• Effect of the surgeon's speciality interest on the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer

  1994cited by this paper
• Colorectal surgeons in district general hospitals produce similar survival outcomes to their teaching hospital colleagues: review of 5-year survivals in Manchester.

  1992cited by this paper
• Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.

  1980cited by this paper
• Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. 1979.

  1979cited by this paper

• Inpatient mortality and failure to rescue in lung cancer patients by hospital certification status: Cross-sectional analysis of nationwide german discharge data 2014-2023.

  2026cites this paper
• Impact of surgical case load on recurrence rates in pilonidal sinus disease: a cross-study data synthesis

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of hospital volume on survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer – A Dutch population‐based study

  2025cites this paper
• Urgent Colectomies for Cancer: Evaluating the Role of Specialized Colorectal Surgeons

  2025cites this paper
• Pilonidal reality calls for action

  2024cites this paper
• Hospital Volume for Rectal Cancer Resection Plays a Pivotal Role in Improving Outcomes: A Population-based Analysis.

  2024cites this paper
• ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SURGICAL VOLUME AND MORTALITY FROM COLON CANCER IN COLOMBIA: A NATIONAL COHORT

  2024cites this paper
• Treatment in certified cancer centers is related to better survival in patients with colon and rectal cancer: evidence from a large German cohort study

  2024cites this paper
• Who should operate patients presenting with emergent colon cancer? A comparison of short- and long-term outcome depending on surgical sub-specialization

  2023cites this paper
• Significance of surgical first assistant expertise for surgical site infection prevention: Propensity score matching analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Updated systematic review of the approach to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer.

  2022cites this paper
• Abdominoperineal Resection in the United Kingdom: a Case against Centralisation

  2022cites this paper
• Rectal cancer surgery

  2022cites this paper
• Risk-adjusted analysis of survival variability among hospitals treating biliary malignancy

  2022cites this paper
• Influence of age on surgical treatment and postoperative outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer in Denmark and Yorkshire, England

  2021cites this paper
• Surgeon Volume and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

  2021cites this paper
• Improving cancer services and survival in New Zealand

  2020cites this paper
• Provider caseload volume and short-term outcomes following colorectal surgeries in New Brunswick: a provincial-level cohort study.

  2020cites this paper
• Patterns and characteristics of patients' selection of cancer surgeons.

  2020cites this paper
• Factors impacting oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

  2020cites this paper
• Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit

  2020cites this paper
• Cancer of the Rectum

  2020cites this paper
• The Management of Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A European Perspective

  2019cites this paper
• Association of hospital and surgeon volume with mortality following major surgical procedures

  2019cites this paper
• Benchmarking rectal cancer care: institutional compliance with a longitudinal checklist.

  2018cites this paper
• Relationship between hospital volume and short-term outcomes: a nationwide population-based study including 75,280 rectal cancer surgical procedures

  2018cites this paper
• The Impact of Hospital Volume and Charlson Score on Postoperative Mortality of Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 45,569 Patients

  2018cites this paper
• Centralisation of cancer surgery and the impact on patients' travel burden.

  2018cites this paper
• Surgeon volume and prognosis of patients with advanced papillary thyroid cancer and lateral nodal metastasis

  2018cites this paper
• Intraoperative Tumor Perforation is Associated with Decreased 5-Year Survival in Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Database Study

  2017cites this paper
• Selection Factors for Reoperative Surgery for Local Recurrent Rectal Cancer

  2017cites this paper
• Impact of hospital volume on quality indicators for rectal cancer surgery in British Columbia, Canada.

  2017cites this paper
• High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.

  2016cites this paper
• Prospective multicenter registration study of colorectal cancer: significant variations in radicality and oncosurgical quality—Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Protocol SAKK 40/00

  2016cites this paper
• Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews

  2016influential citation
• Clinical outcome of interstitial pulsed dose rate brachytherapy in multimodality treatment of locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal and sigmoid cancer with high risk of incomplete microscopic resection

  2016cites this paper
• [Long-term results of obstructing colonic cancer].

  2016cites this paper
• Cirugía urgente del cáncer de colon como factor pronóstico de recidiva y supervivencia

  2016cites this paper
• Анализ гистологического строения, типов роста и характера метастазирования осложненного колоректального рака

  2016cites this paper
• Influence of Individual Surgeon Volume on Oncological Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Surgery

  2015cites this paper
• A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark

  2015cites this paper
• Long-Term Follow-Up and Survivorship After Completing Systematic Surveillance in Stage I–III Colorectal Cancer: Who Is Still at Risk?

  2015cites this paper
• Circumferential Resection Margin as a Prognostic Marker in the Modern Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Optimizing Rectal Cancer Management: Analysis of Current Evidence

  2014cites this paper
• High performance in surgery

  2014cites this paper
• Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference.

  2014cites this paper
• Volume-outcome relationship in colon cancer surgery: another biased logical short cut towards questionable centralization policies.

  2014cites this paper
• The impact of structural factors in colon and rectal cancer surgery

  2014cites this paper
• Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference

  2014cites this paper
• Hospital and geographic variability in thirty-day all-cause mortality following colorectal cancer surgery.

  2014cites this paper
• Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery

  2014cites this paper
• Postoperative 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: development of a prognostic model using administrative claims data

  2014cites this paper
• Pasientvolum og behandlingskvalitet ved kreftkirurgi

  2014cites this paper
• Predictors of variation in colorectal cancer care and outcomes in New South Wales: a population‐based health data linkage study

  2014cites this paper
• Perioperative fluid infusion and its influence on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: implications for prevention strategies

  2013cites this paper
• State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

  2013cites this paper
• Potential biases in colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood test.

  2013cites this paper
• Multicentre study of circumferential margin positivity and outcomes following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Academic and nonacademic laboratories perform equally on CIQC immunohistochemistry proficiency testing.

  2013cites this paper
• General surgeons vs. colorectal surgeons: Who should be doing what to whom?

  2013cites this paper
• Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management

  2013cites this paper
• Retrospective review of rectal cancer surgery in northern Alberta.

  2013cites this paper
• Defining quality in colon cancer surgery.

  2012cites this paper
• Colorectal surgery: rigour and logic when treating pelvic floor disorders

  2012cites this paper
• Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.

  2012cites this paper
• Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in

  2012cites this paper
• Hospital factors and patient characteristics in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a population based study

  2012cites this paper
• Tourniquet use in knee replacement surgery: what is the evidence?

  2012cites this paper
• Comment réduire la morbidité de la chirurgie du cancer du rectum ?

  2012cites this paper
• How to decrease the postoperative morbidity after rectal cancer surgery

  2012cites this paper
• A 10‐year experience of total pelvic exenteration for primary advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer based on a prospective database

  2012cites this paper
• Surgeon and hospital‐related risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery

  2011cites this paper
• Current management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

  2011cites this paper
• A multidisciplinary cancer center maximizes surgeons' impact.

  2011cites this paper
• Volume–outcome analysis of colorectal cancer‐related outcomes

  2010cites this paper
• Die Implementierung zertifizierter multidisziplinärer Brustzentren Ein interventionelles Kooperationsprojekt der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Senologie in Partnerschaft mit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

  2010cites this paper
• Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2010cites this paper
• Risk Factors of Tumour Recurrence and Reduced Survival in Rectal Cancer

  2010cites this paper
• Rectal cancer surgery: volume–outcome analysis

  2010cites this paper
• Racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival

  2010cites this paper
• Factores de riesgo de mortalidad postoperatoria en el cáncer colorrectal: seguimiento de una cohorte en una unidad especializada

  2010cites this paper
• Centralization of rectal cancer surgery improves long‐term survival

  2010cites this paper
• Variation in treatment and outcome of patients with rectal cancer by region, hospital type and volume in the Netherlands.

  2010cites this paper
• [Postoperative mortality risk factors in colorectal cancer: follow up of a cohort in a specialised unit].

  2010cites this paper
• Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: are they related?

  2010cites this paper
• The multidisciplinary team conference in rectal cancer – a step forward

  2009cites this paper
• Certification of breast centres in Germany: proof of concept for a prototypical example of quality assurance in multidisciplinary cancer care

  2009cites this paper
• The impact of socioeconomic factors on 30-day mortality following elective colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide study.

  2009cites this paper
• [Digestive oncology: surgical practices].

  2009cites this paper
• NGX 6 inhibits AP-1 and Ets-1 expression and down-regulates cyclin D 1 in human colorectal cancer

  2009cites this paper
• The RN first assistant: an expert resource for surgical site infection prevention.

  2009cites this paper
• Necessity of centralisation of EBUS.

  2009cites this paper
• The Impact of Hospital Volume on Surgical Outcome in Patients with Rectal Cancer

  2009cites this paper
• Surgical Site Infections Following Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Diabetes: Association with Postoperative Hyperglycemia

  2009cites this paper
• NGX6 inhibits AP-1 and Ets-1 expression and down-regulates cyclin D1 in human colorectal cancer.

  2009cites this paper
• Chirurgie des kolorektalen Karzinoms

  2009cites this paper
• Cancérologie digestive : pratiques chirurgicales

  2009cites this paper
• Do patient characteristics, disease, or treatment explain social inequality in survival from colorectal cancer?

  2009cites this paper
• Het volume van chirurgische ingrepen en de impact ervan op de uitkomst

  2009cites this paper