Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

• Publication date

  2007-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3PMID 19385804
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The theory of cognitive dissonance By

  2008cited by this paper
• What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists

  2007cited by this paper
• Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research

  2006cited by this paper
• Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors

  2006cited by this paper
• Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education

  2005cited by this paper
• Faculty Misconduct in Collegiate Teaching

  2003cited by this paper
• Medicine Before Science: The Business of Medicine from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment

  2003cited by this paper
• Real Science. What it is, and what it means

  2001cited by this paper
• Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students

  2000influential reference
• Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction

  1999cited by this paper
• Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute's Graduate Education Project

  1996cited by this paper
• FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE

  1996cited by this paper
• Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change

  1981cited by this paper
• Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists

  1974cited by this paper
• Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.

  1956cited by this paper
• A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

  1954cited by this paper

• Why social norms matter in science: Determinants of misconduct in German-speaking Europe

  2026cites this paper
• Code-sharing policies are associated with increased reproducibility potential of ecological findings

  2025cites this paper
• A Model to Navigate the Ethical Terrain: Reflexive Methodologies in Post-Colonial African Research

  2025cites this paper
• Beyond ad hominem attacks: A typology of the discursive tactics used when objecting to news commentary on social media

  2025cites this paper
• Aligning Scientific Values and Research Integrity: A Study of Researchers’ Perceptions and Practices in Four Countries

  2025cites this paper
• Challenges and actions towards a more comprehensive developmental science

  2025cites this paper
• Credibility revolution: pursuing a balanced and sustainable approach, without dogmas, without magic elixirs

  2025cites this paper
• Why trust adversarial justice?

  2025cites this paper
• Ciência aberta na atividade física e saúde: uma chamada para transparência, colaboração e compartilhamento

  2025cites this paper
• Brazil should prioritize young scientists at home

  2024cites this paper
• National cross-disciplinary research ethics and integrity study: methodology and results from Estonia

  2024cites this paper
• Facets of Trust in Science: Researchers can be perceived as ethical and competent despite inconsistent research results

  2024influential citation
• The Promises of Responsible Open Science: Is Institutionalization of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness Enough?

  2024cites this paper
• Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research

  2024cites this paper
• A estrada dos tijolos amarelos: Desafios e sugestões para produzir pesquisas qualitativas mais transparentes

  2024cites this paper
• Citation Ethics: An Exploratory Survey of Norms and Behaviors

  2024cites this paper
• *READ**THIS*!! Spam as a threat for open science

  2024cites this paper
• How well are open science practices implemented in industrial and organizational psychology and management?

  2023cites this paper
• Recomendaciones para configurar un paradigma de integridad científica desde la ética de la virtud en educación superior

  2023cites this paper
• Reproducible Research Practices and Barriers to Reproducible Research in Geography: Insights from a Survey

  2023cites this paper
• Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure

  2023cites this paper
• Empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting in ecology

  2023cites this paper
• Teaching scientific research integrity: A case study

  2023cites this paper
• Common methodological mistakes

  2023cites this paper
• Exploring enablers and barriers to implementing the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines: a theory-based survey of journal editors

  2023cites this paper
• Motivating Proactive Biorisk Management

  2023cites this paper
• Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands

  2022influential citation
• The Open Science Challenge: Adopt One Practice that Enacts Widely Shared Values

  2022cites this paper
• Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency.

  2022cites this paper
• Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines

  2022cites this paper
• Formation et transformations de l’esprit scientifique 1934-2022

  2022cites this paper
• Adoption of Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines across Journals

  2022cites this paper
• Open and reproducible practices in developmental psychology research: The workflow of the WomCogDev lab as an example

  2022cites this paper
• Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands

  2021cites this paper
• Social Influences and Normative Dissonance: The Case of Vegetarianism

  2021cites this paper
• Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science

  2021cites this paper
• Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology

  2021cites this paper
• Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research

  2021cites this paper
• Scientific Integrity Matters

  2021cites this paper
• Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective

  2021cites this paper
• Open science reforms: Strengths, challenges, and future directions

  2021cites this paper
• Influences sociales et dissonance normative : le cas du végétarisme

  2021cites this paper
• Improving norms in research culture to incentivize transparency and rigor

  2021cites this paper
• Fostering Interdisciplinary Data Cultures through Early Career Development: The RDA/US Data Share Fellowship

  2021cites this paper
• Certified Amplification: An Emerging Scientific Norm and Ethos

  2021cites this paper
• Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology

  2021cites this paper
• Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice

  2021cites this paper
• Publication pressure threatens the integrity of palaeontological research

  2021cites this paper
• A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints

  2020cites this paper
• Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation

  2020cites this paper
• Reliability of Inference: Analogs of Replication in Qualitative Research

  2020cites this paper
• Measurement Replication in Qualitative and Quantitative Studies

  2020cites this paper
• Transparency and Reproducibility: Conceptualizing the Problem

  2020cites this paper
• What’s Wrong with Replicating the Old Boys’ Networks?

  2020cites this paper
• Transparency and Reproducibility: Potential Solutions

  2020cites this paper
• Replication for Quantitative Research

  2020cites this paper
• Unfolding the Black Box of Questionable Research Practices: Where Is the Line Between Acceptable and Unacceptable Practices?

  2020cites this paper
• Pre-registration and Results-Free Review in Observational and Qualitative Research

  2020cites this paper
• Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science

  2020cites this paper
• Proposals

  2020cites this paper
• Recommendations and future directions for the scientific study of dialectical behavior therapy: emphasizing replication and reproducibility

  2020cites this paper
• Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting

  2020cites this paper
• Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience

  2020cites this paper
• A context sensitive approach to anonymizing public participation GIS data: From development to the assessment of anonymization effects on data quality

  2020cites this paper
• Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers

  2020cites this paper
• Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research

  2020cites this paper
• Busy academics share less: the impact of professional and family roles on academic withholding behaviour

  2020cites this paper
• The Open-Access Availability of Criminological Research to Practitioners and Policy Makers

  2020cites this paper
• A framework for open policy analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Middle years at Columbia

  2020cites this paper
• Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations

  2020cites this paper
• Improving the credibility of empirical legal research: practical suggestions for researchers, journals, and law schools

  2020cites this paper
• Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science?

  2020cites this paper
• Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.

  2020cites this paper
• Coordinating Reappraisals

  2020cites this paper
• Exploratory Research

  2020cites this paper
• Research Cycles

  2020cites this paper
• Index

  2020cites this paper
• Peer Review

  2020cites this paper
• Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science

  2020cites this paper
• Comprehensive Appraisal

  2020cites this paper
• Length Limits

  2020cites this paper
• Ideological Diversity

  2020cites this paper
• Introduction

  2020cites this paper
• Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience

  2020cites this paper
• Making Research Data Accessible

  2020cites this paper
• Impact Metrics

  2020cites this paper
• Contributions towards understanding and building sustainable science

  2019cites this paper
• The lab management practices of “Research Exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators

  2019cites this paper
• Open Science Practices are on the Rise: The State of Social Science (3S) Survey

  2019cites this paper
• Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos?

  2019cites this paper
• Open Science

  2019cites this paper
• Expert witness codes of conduct for forensic practitioners: a review and proposal for reform

  2019cites this paper
• Publishing in 2020: A checklist to support a shift in behaviour to achieve best practice

  2019cites this paper
• CORP: Practical Tools for Improving Experimental Design and Reporting of Laboratory Studies of Cardiovascular Physiology and Metabolism.

  2019cites this paper
• L’éthique de la recherche entre réglementation et réflexivité

  2019cites this paper
• Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science

  2019cites this paper
• Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions

  2018cites this paper
• Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research

  2018influential citation
• The preregistration revolution

  2018cites this paper