The Role of the State in International Trade Theory and Policy: Historical Evidence from South Korea and Brazil

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2019

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Economics, Political Science, History

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• 4. With the Best of Intentions: Types of Development Failure in Latin America

  2019cited by this paper
• Prebisch, Raúl: The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems

  2019influential reference
• Labour standards

  2019cited by this paper
• Brazil’s Import-Substitution Industrialization

  2018cited by this paper
• The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy

  2018cited by this paper
• Development Processes Seen Through Non-Marginalist Lenses with Considerations of Complementarities

  2018cited by this paper
• Leviathan Captured Neoliberalism as Solution and Problem in Brazil

  2018cited by this paper
• The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy

  2018cited by this paper
• Trade Policy from the 1930s to the Present

  2018cited by this paper
• Global Value Chains and Development

  2018cited by this paper
• Paul Krugman's Geographical Economics and Its Implications for Regional Development Theory: A Critical Assessment

  2017cited by this paper
• Is Chinese Competition Causing Deindustrialization in Brazil?

  2015cited by this paper
• An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations

  2015cited by this paper
• Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality

  2015cited by this paper
• Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation

  2015cited by this paper
• A Generalized Linkage Approach to Development, with Special Reference to Staples

  2014cited by this paper
• Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world

  2014cited by this paper
• John Maynard Keynes

  2013cited by this paper
• Deconstructing the Theory of Comparative Advantage

  2013cited by this paper
• The Uruguay Round Negotiations and the Creation of the WTO

  2012cited by this paper
• United States Manufacturing Investment in Brazil: The Impact of Brazilian Government Policies, 1946-1960

  2012cited by this paper
• Free Trade Doesn't Work: What Should Replace It and Why

  2012cited by this paper
• Book Review: Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All

  2011cited by this paper
• Engines of Growth : The State and Transnational Auto Companies in Brazil

  2011cited by this paper
• Services Trade and Policy

  2010cited by this paper
• Total Factor Productivity

  2010cited by this paper
• Developing countries in the ITO and GATT negotiations

  2010cited by this paper
• The Dragon in the Room: China and the Future of Latin American Industrialization

  2010cited by this paper
• Free Trade Under Fire

  2010cited by this paper
• The World Bank

  2009cited by this paper
• Industrial Policy and Development

  2009influential reference
• Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism

  2009cited by this paper
• What Does the Rise of China Do for Industrialisation in Sub-Saharan Africa?

  2008cited by this paper
• In Defense of Globalization: With a New Afterword

  2007cited by this paper
• Globalization and the myth of free trade A N WA R SHAIKH

  2007influential reference
• Export Processing Zones in Development and International Marketing: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda

  2007cited by this paper
• Classical Trade Theory versus Keynes’s General Theory of International Trade and International Payments

  2007cited by this paper
• From Washington to Post-Washington Consensus: A Global Analysis

  2007cited by this paper
• The Social Impact of Globalization in the Developing Countries

  2006cited by this paper
• The Developmental State and the Political Economy of Development

  2006cited by this paper
• The WTO and the Shrinking of Development Space

  2006cited by this paper
• State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery

  2006cited by this paper
• Linking Trade and Labor Standards: Prioritizing the Right of Association

  2006cited by this paper
• From Washington to post-Washington Consensus: Illusions of Development

  2006cited by this paper
• International Labor Standards, Soft Regulation, and National Government Roles

  2006cited by this paper
• MODERN MACROECONOMICS : ITS ORIGINS , DEVELOPMENT , AND CURRENT STATE

  2006cited by this paper
• Growth, trade and uneven development

  2005cited by this paper
• Rethinking the Emerging Post‐Washington Consensus

  2005cited by this paper
• Fairness in International Trade Negotiations: Brazil and India in the WTO

  2005cited by this paper
• Neo-liberalism and East Asia: Resisting the Washington Consensus

  2005cited by this paper
• From Washington to Post-Washington Consensus: Neoliberal Agendas for Economic Development

  2005cited by this paper
• International Trade Theory and Policy: What is Left of the Free Trade Paradigm?: International Trade Theory and Policy

  2005influential reference
• The Poverty of

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessing the Benefits to Developing Countries of Liberalisation in Services Trade

  2004cited by this paper
• Reclaiming Development: An Alternative Economic Policy Manual

  2004cited by this paper
• Institutions and growth in East Asia

  2004cited by this paper
• Lifting the Natural Resource Curse

  2004cited by this paper
• From Keynesianism to Neoliberalism: Shifting Paradigms in Economics

  2004cited by this paper
• Financial liberalization in South Korea

  2004cited by this paper
• Trade Liberalization and Developing Countries under the Doha Round

  2003cited by this paper
• What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’

  2003influential reference
• Terms‐of‐Trade Shocks and Economic Performance, 1870–1940: Prebisch and Singer Revisited*

  2003cited by this paper
• Rethinking development economics

  2003cited by this paper
• Kicking Away the Ladder: An Unofficial History of Capitalism, Especially in Britain and the United States

  2002cited by this paper
• The Poverty of "Development Economics."

  2002cited by this paper
• Kicking away the ladder : development strategy in historical perspective

  2002cited by this paper
• What is the Predictive Power of Market Orientation

  2002cited by this paper
• TRADE IN SERVICES - MARKET ACCESS OPPORTUNITIES AND THE BENEFITS OF LIBERALIZATION FOR DEVELOPING ECONOMIES

  2002cited by this paper
• Trade Theory and Factor Intensities: An Interpretive Essay

  2002cited by this paper
• Directly Unproductive Profit-Seeking Activities

  2002cited by this paper
• David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage

  2002cited by this paper
• The Role of FDI, Exports and Spillover Effects in the Regional Development of China

  2002cited by this paper
• Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development: Historical lessons and emerging issues

  2001cited by this paper
• New Trade Theory versus Old Trade Policy: A Continuing Enigma

  2001cited by this paper
• Neither the Washington nor the post-Washington consensus: an introduction

  2001cited by this paper
• Bridging the Trade-Environment Divide

  2001cited by this paper
• Implementing the Uruguay Round Agreements: Problems for Developing Countries

  2001cited by this paper
• A Journey from Havana to Paris: The Fifty-Year Quest for the Elusive Multilateral Agreement on Investment

  2000cited by this paper
• Testing times for the ILO: institutional reform for the new international political economy

  1999cited by this paper
• The Investment Function Revisited: Disciplining Capital in South Korea

  1999cited by this paper
• The role of the state in skill formation: evidence from the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan

  1999cited by this paper
• Big Business, Strong State: Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Development, 1960–1990. By Eun Mee Kim · Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997. xvii + 280 pp. Bibliographic references and index. Cloth, $59.50. ISBN 0791432092

  1999cited by this paper
• Measuring Services Trade Liberalization and its Impact on Economic Growth: An Illustration

  1999cited by this paper
• Implementation of Uruguay Round Commitments: The Development Challenge

  1999cited by this paper
• The Division and Size of Gains from Liberalization in Service Networks

  1998cited by this paper
• The Roles of State and Market in the Development Process, with Special Reference to the ‘East Asian Miracle’

  1998cited by this paper
• From Promising Beginnings to Divergent Paths: Brazil and Korea

  1998cited by this paper
• Structural Adjustment in East Asia and Latin America: A Selective Literature Review

  1998cited by this paper
• The distribution of gains between borrowing and investing countries re-visited: the case of India

  1998cited by this paper
• Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope

  1997cited by this paper
• An Empirical Multi‐Country Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Trade Flows

  1997cited by this paper
• Are International Labor Standards Needed To Prevent Social Dumping

  1997cited by this paper
• The Political Economy of Industrial Promotion

  1996cited by this paper
• The Regulation of International Trade

  1996cited by this paper
• Reassessing the Theory of Comparative Advantage

  1996cited by this paper
• Capital Control, Financial Regulation, And Industrial Policy In South Korea And Brazil

  1996cited by this paper
• Industrial Policy, Sectoral Maturation, and Postwar Economic Growth in Brazil: The Resource Curse Thesis*

  1995cited by this paper
• Structural adjustment and African industry

  1995cited by this paper
• Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation

  1995cited by this paper
• Industrialization and the State: The Korean Heavy and Chemical Industry Drive

  1995cited by this paper

• The Impact of Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement on Indonesian Economy: Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Model

  2020influential citation