The olfactory system is highly conserved across mammalian species (Ache and Young, 2005; Gelperin, 1999; Hildebrand and Shepherd, 1997; Laurent, 2002). In particular, the human and rodent olfactory systems share numerous common traits, including the basic organization of the olfactory central nervous system, aspects of odor guided behaviors, the nature of odorant receptor proteins, and processing at the molecular and synaptic levels (Fig. 1). These shared characteristics make rodents an excellent model for use in understanding the human olfactory system and has led to widespread use of rodents in olfactory studies. As a result, knowledge of the rodent olfactory system is expansive, and has been the primary guide to human olfactory research for decades. Though the olfactory systems of the two species are highly similar (Ache and Young, 2005), some differences are apparent (Mainland et al., 2014; Maresh et al., 2008; McGann, 2017; Trimmer et al., 2019), and direct data from humans is lacking. Our current understanding of the human olfactory system relies substantially on inferences from direct knowledge obtained in rodents. Inferring from rodents is well justified, and has moved the field of human olfaction forward. However, within the growing human olfaction literature, it is often unclear which statements are inferred from rodent work, and which are directly from human data. In a field dominated by rodent studies, and in order to avoid confusion and compounded misstatements, there arises a periodic need to assess the state of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system. Our goal here is to provide a thorough review of olfactory literature in order to assess and clarify our current direct knowledge of the human olfactory system, as compared to the rodent olfactory system.
Assessment of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system.
Gregory Lane,Guangyu Zhou,Torben Noto,C. Zelano
Published 2020 in Experimental Neurology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Experimental Neurology
- Publication date
2020-04-09
- Fields of study
Biology, Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-46 of 46 citing papers · Page 1 of 1