What Level of Bowel Prep Quality Requires Early Repeat Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  American Journal of Gastroenterology

• Publication date

  2014-08-19

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/ajg.2014.232PMID 25135006PMCID PMC4423726
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy

  2015cited by this paper
• Circulating MicroRNAs as a Novel Class of Diagnostic Biomarkers in Gastrointestinal Tumors Detection: A Meta-Analysis Based on 42 Articles

  2014cited by this paper
• The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

  2014cited by this paper
• Nurse Observation During Colonoscopy Increases Polyp Detection: A Randomized Prospective Study

  2013influential reference
• Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rates in the Proximal and Distal Colon

  2013cited by this paper
• Pilot validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale in China

  2013cited by this paper
• Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.

  2013influential reference
• Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing

  2013cited by this paper
• The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

  2013cited by this paper
• Cancer statistics, 2012

  2012cited by this paper
• Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3)

  2012influential reference
• Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update.

  2012cited by this paper
• The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.

  2012influential reference
• Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.

  2012cited by this paper
• Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

  2012cited by this paper
• QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

  2011cited by this paper
• Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate.

  2011cited by this paper
• Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

  2011cited by this paper
• [Quality indicators for colonoscopy in the Peruvian Japanese Policlinic: linked factors].

  2011cited by this paper
• Indicadores de calidad en colonoscopía en el Policlínico Peruano Japonés: Factores relacionados

  2011cited by this paper
• Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration

  2011cited by this paper
• Different Bowel Preparation Schedule Leads to Different Diagnostic Yield of Proximal and Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasm at Screening Colonoscopy in Average-Risk Population

  2011cited by this paper
• Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

  2010cited by this paper
• American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008

  2009cited by this paper
• Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.

  2009cited by this paper
• Technical Performance of Colonoscopy: The Key Role of Sedation/Analgesia and Other Quality Indicators

  2008cited by this paper
• The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research.

  2007cited by this paper
• Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

  2007cited by this paper
• The Impact of Colon Cleanliness Assessment on Endoscopists' Recommendations for Follow-Up Colonoscopy

  2007cited by this paper
• Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

  2006cited by this paper
• Proton Pump Inhibitor or Testing for Helicobacter pylori as the First Step for Patients Presenting with Dyspepsia? A Cluster-Randomized Trial

  2006cited by this paper
• Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

  2005influential reference
• Consensus Statement

  2004cited by this paper
• Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality.

  2004cited by this paper
• Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

  2003cited by this paper
• Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence

  2001cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting

  2000cited by this paper
• A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda.

  2000cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

  2000cited by this paper
• Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I.

  1999cited by this paper
• What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

  1998cited by this paper
• Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

  1993cited by this paper
• Cancer statistics

  1989cited by this paper
• Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

  1987cited by this paper

• Availability and use of computer-aided detection during colonoscopy: A real-world observational study at an Australian tertiary center

  2026cites this paper
• Artificial Intelligence Model for Automated Identification of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy (AI‐PREPOO): A Multicenter Study

  2026cites this paper
• Bowel Cleansing Effectiveness of Sulfate-Based Tablet Versus Sulfate-Based Solution for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Noninferiority Study

  2025cites this paper
• Safety of a standardized bowel preparation protocol for colonoscopy: results of a pilot study

  2025cites this paper
• Consensus by Delphi method on the bowel cleansing for colonoscopy

  2025cites this paper
• Remedial colon hydrotherapy device enema as a salvage strategy for inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A retrospective cohort study

  2025cites this paper
• Comparative efficacy of 200 mg versus 1200 mg of simethicone with 3 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

  2025cites this paper
• Bowel preparation quality and computer-aided detection of adenomas during colonoscopy.

  2025cites this paper
• Is Cognitive Impairment Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy?

  2025cites this paper
• Optimizing Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: Consensus Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

  2025cites this paper
• Colonoscopy Quality and Strategies for Improvement

  2025influential citation
• Evaluating quality indicators in colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical tests: a five-year study from a developing country

  2025cites this paper
• A mobile app to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening and post polypectomy surveillance guidelines

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of Bowel Preparation Type on Colonoscopy Quality and Adenoma Detection: A Comparative Study

  2025cites this paper
• Strategies to Enhance the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) and the Serrated Polyp Detection Rate (SPDR) in Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Review

  2025cites this paper
• A prospective single-masked, non-inferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a ChatGPT-based AI chatbot to improve Boston bowel preparation scores for colonoscopy preparation: A trial protocol

  2025cites this paper
• Optimizing bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy: consensus recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

  2025cites this paper
• Artificial intelligence supported colonoscopy bowel preparation assessment: a video-based approach

  2025cites this paper
• Association of distal adenoma and hyperplastic polyp characteristics with long-term proximal colon cancer risk: a secondary, observational analysis of data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial

  2025cites this paper
• Optimizing Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: Consensus Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

  2025cites this paper
• Excellent Bowel Preparation Quality Is Not Superior to Good Bowel Preparation Quality for Improving Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate

  2024cites this paper
• Fair Is Not Square: More Evidence Linking Bowel Cleanliness to Colonoscopy Outcomes.

  2024cites this paper
• The Impact of an Educational 3D Virtual Reality Video Method on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: First Results

  2024cites this paper
• Online Educational Module Improves Knowledge of Nurses on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

  2024cites this paper
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps

  2024cites this paper
• An intraprocedural bowel cleansing system for difficult‐to‐prepare patients—A multicenter prospective feasibility study

  2024cites this paper
• A randomized prospective study comparing the effect of low-volume bowel preparations for colonoscopy preparation in China

  2024cites this paper
• Assessment of the Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Study

  2024cites this paper
• Correlative Factors of Severity of Air Bubbles in the Large Intestine during Colonoscopy

  2024cites this paper
• A smartphone application to enhance bowel preparation for first-time colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study

  2024cites this paper
• Impact of inadequate bowel cleansing in sigmoidoscopy screening

  2024cites this paper
• Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023

  2024cites this paper
• Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Colonoscopy Findings and Colorectal Cancer Deaths in a Nation-Wide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

  2024cites this paper
• Improved Adenoma Detection Rate Using a Novel Colonoscopic Distal Attachment: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

  2024cites this paper
• Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer

  2024cites this paper
• Effectiveness and safety of a 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbic acid preparation for colonoscopy in routine clinical practice in Spain.

  2024cites this paper
• Two Centers Affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

  2023cites this paper
• Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Effect of Visual Booklets to Improve Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

  2023cites this paper
• SPLIT-DOSE BOWEL PREPARATION IS SUPERIOR TO STRAIGHT-DOSE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS UNDERGOING INPATIENT COLONOSCOPY.

  2023cites this paper
• Curriculum for training in endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

  2023cites this paper
• Advanced intestinal regulation improves bowel preparation quality in patients with constipation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Impact of WeChat guidance on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a quasi-experiment study

  2023cites this paper
• Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Novel Colon Preparation Method Combining Bowel Cleanser Reduction and Unique Walking

  2023cites this paper
• Problems of bowel preparation for colonoscopy (review)

  2023cites this paper
• Considerations for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Trials

  2023cites this paper
• Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients

  2023cites this paper
• The Efficacy of 480 ml Oral Sodium Sulfate for Improving Insufficient Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy with High-Concentrated Polyethylene Glycol

  2023cites this paper
• Effect of Educational Intervention on Knowledge, Satisfaction and Quality of Bowel Preparation for Patients Scheduled for Colonoscopy

  2023cites this paper
• Interobserver Variation of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

  2023cites this paper
• Individualized intervention based on a preparation-related prediction model improves adequacy of bowel preparation: A prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.

  2023cites this paper
• Efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate versus 4 L polyethylene glycol in split-dose for colonoscopy cleansing in out and inpatient: A multicentre, randomized trial (OVER 2019).

  2023cites this paper
• Patients' Description of Rectal Effluents Help Predict the Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation

  2023cites this paper
• Taking a Long and Hard Look at Quality Predictors of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

  2023cites this paper
• Development and validation of a three-dimensional deep learning-based system for assessing bowel preparation on colonoscopy video

  2023cites this paper
• Findings from the first colorectal cancer screening among 103 542 individuals in Vietnam with systematic review of colorectal cancer screening programs in Asia-Pacific region.

  2022cites this paper
• Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial

  2022cites this paper
• Supplementary education can improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation in outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

  2022cites this paper
• Reinforced education by short message service improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy

  2022cites this paper
• Automated Detection of Bowel Preparation Scoring and Adequacy With Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

  2022cites this paper
• Quality of surveillance impacts the colitis-associated advanced neoplasia risk: a multicenter case-control study.

  2022cites this paper
• Impact of Community Referral on Colonoscopy Quality Metrics in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

  2022cites this paper
• The Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Very Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Compared to Low and High-Volume Polyethylene Glycol-Solutions in the Real-Life Setting

  2022cites this paper
• The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study

  2022cites this paper
• 3 liters of polyethylene glycol vs. standard bowel preparation have equal efficacy in a Chinese population: a randomized, controlled trial.

  2022cites this paper
• Dedicated staff for patient education improves bowel preparation quality and reduces the cecal intubation time of colonoscopy: A single institution retrospective study

  2022cites this paper
• Improving the Tolerability and Safety of 1L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Low-dose Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation in a Healthy Population: A Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial.

  2022cites this paper
• Assessment of a Novel Nutritive Solution (NUTRIMOV) and Sodium Diatrizoate (Gastrografin) Booster for Bowel Cleaning Prior to Colonoscopy

  2022cites this paper
• Improving Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation and Reducing Patient Anxiety Through Recently Developed Online Information Resource: A Cross-sectional Study

  2022cites this paper
• Developing and testing an educational app on bowel preparation

  2022cites this paper
• Taking Oral Sulfate Tablets with Simethicone for Bowel Preparation Leads to Higher Adenoma Detection Rate than Polyethylene Glycol: A Propensity Score Analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening: From One-Size-FITs-All to Tailor-Made

  2022cites this paper
• Runaway Insufflation: Does Anesthesia or Spasm Hinder Insufflation During Colonoscopy?

  2022cites this paper
• The Efficacy of Senna Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

  2022cites this paper
• Appropriate timing of repeat colonoscopy for patients with inadequate bowel preparation: Right now or within 1 year?

  2022cites this paper
• Effect of oral simethicone on the quality of colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

  2022cites this paper
• Trial protocol for COLO‐DETECT: A randomized controlled trial of lesion detection comparing colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius™ artificial intelligence endoscopy module with standard colonoscopy

  2022cites this paper
• Regular feedback to individual endoscopists is associated with improved adenoma detection rate and other key performance indicators for colonoscopy

  2022cites this paper
• Factors affecting colorectal adenoma detection rate

  2022cites this paper
• The Patient Experience of an Inadequate-Quality Bowel Preparation During the Colonoscopy Process

  2022cites this paper
• Characteristics of Interval Colorectal Cancer: A Canadian Retrospective Population-Level Analysis from Newfoundland and Labrador

  2022cites this paper
• Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality

  2022influential citation
• Clinical practice standards for colonoscopy.

  2021cites this paper
• A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy After Failed Bowel Preparation

  2021cites this paper
• Safety and efficacy of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid bowel preparation in patients with baseline renal impairment or diabetes: subanalysis of a randomized, controlled trial

  2021cites this paper
• Colorectal Cancer Screening: Theory and Practical Application

  2021cites this paper
• Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience

  2021cites this paper
• Endoscopy to Diagnose and Prevent Digestive Cancers in Lynch Syndrome

  2021cites this paper
• A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Low-Residue Diet Versus Clear Liquid Diet

  2021cites this paper
• A novel 1-L PEG + ascorbate versus high-volume PEG regimen for colonoscopy cleansing: a multicenter, randomized, phase IV study.

  2021cites this paper
• Endoscopy

  2021cites this paper
• Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy

  2021cites this paper
• Effect of the Weekend on Bowel Preparation Quality in Outpatient Colonoscopies

  2021cites this paper
• Educating Outpatients for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy Using Conventional Methods vs Virtual Reality Videos Plus Conventional Methods

  2021cites this paper
• Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study

  2021cites this paper
• Can image‐enhanced endoscopy improve adenoma detection rate?

  2021cites this paper
• Development and Implementation of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Patients Requiring Colonoscopy

  2021cites this paper
• Association between anxiety, depression, and bowel air bubbles at colonoscopy: a prospective observational study.

  2021cites this paper