On the Critique by Colin Anderson of ‘A Reply to Dembic: On an End to the Beginning of Mis‐Understanding the Immune Response’

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  Scandinavian Journal of Immunology

• Publication date

  2009-07-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Philosophy, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02264.xPMID 19522761PMCID PMC2729654
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Placing Regulatory T cells into Global Theories of Immunity: an Analysis of Cohn’s Challenge to Integrity (Dembic)

  2009cited by this paper
• A Reply to Dembic: On an End to the Beginning of Misunderstanding the Immune Response

  2009cited by this paper
• On the opposing views of the self–nonself discrimination by the immune system

  2009cited by this paper
• Beginning of the End of (Understanding) the Immune Response

  2008influential reference
• Tolerance can be infectious

  2008cited by this paper
• Lymphoid tissue genesis induced by commensals through NOD1 regulates intestinal homeostasis

  2008cited by this paper
• What roles do regulatory T cells play in the control of the adaptive immune response?

  2008influential reference
• A Rationalized Set of Default Postulates that Permit a Coherent Description of the Immune System Amenable to Computer Modeling

  2008influential reference
• An in depth analysis of the concept of “polyspecificity” assumed to characterize TCR/BCR recognition

  2008cited by this paper
• Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control?

  2007cited by this paper
• Conceptualizing the Self-Nonself Discrimination by the Vertebrate Immune System

  2007influential reference
• Danger-free autoimmune disease in Aire-deficient mice

  2007cited by this paper
• Time, Space and Contextual Models of the Immunity Tolerance Decision: Bridging the Geographical Divide of Zinkernagel and Hengartner's ‘Credo 2004’

  2006cited by this paper
• On ‘Credo 2004’ as Viewed Under the ‘Development‐Context’ Model of Colin Anderson

  2006influential reference
• Spontaneous autoimmunity prevented by thymic expression of a single self-antigen

  2006cited by this paper
• A Commentary on the Zinkernagel–Hengartner ‘Credo 2004’

  2005cited by this paper
• Degeneracy, mimicry and crossreactivity in immune recognition.

  2005cited by this paper
• A Commentary on the Zinkernagel–Hengartner ‘Credo 2004’

  2005cited by this paper
• A biological context for the self-nonself discrimination and the regulation of effector class by the immune system

  2005cited by this paper
• On ‘reactivity’ versus ‘tolerance’

  2004cited by this paper
• Whither T-suppressors: if they didn't exist would we have to invent them?

  2004cited by this paper
• Self-nonself discrimination by T lymphocytes.

  2004cited by this paper
• A computerized model for the self-non-self discrimination at the level of the T(h) (Th genesis). II. The behavior of the system upon encounter with non-self antigens.

  2003cited by this paper
• Inhibition of Human CD4+CD25+high Regulatory T Cell Function1

  2002cited by this paper
• Uncertainties − discrepancies in immunology

  2002cited by this paper
• A computerized model for the self-non-self discrimination at the level of the T(h) (Th genesis). I. The origin of 'primer' effector T(h) cells.

  2002cited by this paper
• The Danger Model: A Renewed Sense of Self

  2002cited by this paper
• Testing Time-, Ignorance-, and Danger-Based Models of Tolerance

  2001cited by this paper
• Immune system protects integrity of tissues.

  2000influential reference
• The specificity of immunological reactions.

  2000cited by this paper
• On the role of feedback in promoting conflicting goals of the adaptive immune system.

  1999cited by this paper
• A new concept of immune specificity emerges from a consideration of the self-nonself discrimination.

  1997cited by this paper
• Morphostasis: an evolving perspective.

  1997cited by this paper
• Immunology Taught by Viruses

  1996cited by this paper
• Evidence for a Thymus‐Dependent Form of Tolerance that is Not Based on Elimination or Anergy of Reactive T cells

  1996cited by this paper
• Immunological tolerance: Danger – pathogen on the premises!

  1996cited by this paper
• Danger - pathogen on the premises! Immunological tolerance.

  1996cited by this paper
• Tolerance, danger, and the extended family.

  1994cited by this paper
• The Role of Thymic Epithelium in the Establishment of Transplantation Tolerance

  1993cited by this paper
• The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self.

  1992cited by this paper
• The self/nonself discrimination: reconstructing a cabbage from sauerkraut.

  1992cited by this paper
• The protecton: the unit of humoral immunity selected by evolution.

  1990cited by this paper
• Commentary on “The Protecton: The Evolutionarily Selected Unit of Humoral Immunity”

  1990cited by this paper
• The Protection: The Unit of Humoral Immunity Selected by Evolution

  1990cited by this paper
• The E-T (elephant-tadpole) paradox necessitates the concept of a unit of B-cell function: the protection.

  1987cited by this paper
• Tolerance induced by thymic epithelial grafts in birds.

  1987cited by this paper
• Non-tolerance and autoantibodies to a transgenic self antigen expressed in pancreatic β cells

  1987cited by this paper
• THE LOGIC OF CELL INTERACTIONS IN DETERMINING IMMUNE RESPONSIVENESS

  1975cited by this paper

• Thoughts Engendered by Bretscher's Two‐Step, Two‐Signal Model for a Peripheral Self–Non‐Self Discrimination and the Origin of Primer Effector T Helpers

  2015cites this paper
• What is so special about thinking; after all, we all do it!

  2012cites this paper
• How do Regulatory T Cells Work?

  2009cites this paper
• On the Sorting of the Repertoire: An analysis of Cohn’s challenge to Integrity (Dembic), Round 2

  2009cites this paper