The DPPH method has been reported with misconceptions in a large number of studies, thus precluding comparison of results. Attention is drawn to a common mistake in the unit used to express the IC50 of ascorbic acid and other antioxidant substances. Concentration of the antioxidant is widely misused with a total disregard for the DPPH• concentration, while the molar ratio of antioxidant/DPPH• would be the correct choice. Data from 26 studies with widely varying IC50 values were renormalized according to reaction stoichiometry, resulting in values which are more coherent and closer to the ideal one of 0.25 for at least 15 of them. In addition, the model which is currently being used to calculate the DPPH• concentration can lead to an overestimation of around 7%, as it does not take into account the small contribution of the reaction product. In view of that, we present a mathematical model to correct the overestimation of the DPPH• concentration.
A critical examination of the DPPH method: Mistakes and inconsistencies in stoichiometry and IC50 determination by UV-Vis spectroscopy.
Bryan Brummelhaus de Menezes,L. M. Frescura,R. Duarte,M. Villetti,Marcelo Barcellos da Rosa
Published 2021 in Analytica Chimica Acta
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
Analytica Chimica Acta
- Publication date
2021-05-01
- Fields of study
Medicine, Chemistry
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-69 of 69 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-86 of 86 citing papers · Page 1 of 1