Human beings are predisposed to identifying false patterns in statistical noise, a likely survival advantage during our evolutionary development. Moreover, humans seem to prefer “positive” results over “negative” ones. These two cognitive features lay a framework for premature adoption of falsely positive studies. Added to this predisposition is the tendency of journals to “overbid” for exciting or newsworthy manuscripts, incentives in both the academic and publishing industries that value change over truth and scientific rigour, and a growing dependence on complex statistical techniques that some reviewers do not understand. The purpose of this article is to describe the underlying causes of premature adoption and provide recommendations that may improve the quality of published science.
Apophenia and anesthesia: how we sometimes change our practice prematurely
N. Hanson,M. Lavallee,R. Thiele
Published 2021 in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
- Publication date
2021-05-07
- Fields of study
Medicine, Philosophy
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-6 of 6 citing papers · Page 1 of 1