The spread of AI-embedded systems involved in human decision making makes studying human trust in these systems critical. However, empirically investigating trust is challenging. One reason is the lack of standard protocols to design trust experiments. In this paper, we present a survey of existing methods to empirically investigate trust in AI-assisted decision making and analyse the corpus along the constitutive elements of an experimental protocol. We find that the definition of trust is not commonly integrated in experimental protocols, which can lead to findings that are overclaimed or are hard to interpret and compare across studies. Drawing from empirical practices in social and cognitive studies on human-human trust, we provide practical guidelines to improve the methodology of studying Human-AI trust in decision-making contexts. In addition, we bring forward research opportunities of two types: one focusing on further investigation regarding trust methodologies and the other on factors that impact Human-AI trust.
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Oleksandra Vereschak,G. Bailly,Baptiste Caramiaux
Published 2021 in Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.
- Publication date
2021-10-13
- Fields of study
Computer Science, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.