ABSTRACT In this paper, I revisit a series of debates in American political theory that began in the early 1950s and focused on the meaning of apathy in democratic politics. As I show, these debates were also about the role of theory and theorists in politics. One group of scholars accepted apathy as a social fact and claimed that classical ideas about political participation should be re-examined as part of a broader realist turn in political theory. Another group rejected this view and suggested that apathy only represents political and social inequalities that prevent citizens from participating. Political theory, they believed, should help individuals transcend reality instead of accepting it. In this article, I offer a new interpretation of these debates and show their significance for the development of political thought during the second half of the Twentieth-Century.
Between realism and relevance: apathy and political theory 1950–1970
Published 2021 in Global Intellectual History
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
Global Intellectual History
- Publication date
2021-07-22
- Fields of study
Political Science, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-1 of 1 citing papers · Page 1 of 1