Abstract Cognitive psychologists have found that taking practice tests improves students’ learning, and some claim that tests that require recall are more effective than those that require recognition. This study examined whether recognition (i.e., multiple-choice) quizzes were as effective as cued-recall (i.e., fill-in-the-blank) quizzes for improving introductory psychology students’ exam performance. Chapters covered on each of four exams were assigned to either a no-quiz, fill-in-the-blank-quiz, or multiple-choice-quiz condition, and I evaluated students’ average exam performance on questions related to each quiz condition. Both the multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank quizzes improved students’ exam scores, and there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two types of quizzes.
Effects of Cued-Recall Versus Recognition Retrieval Practice on Beginning College Students’ Exam Performance
Published 2021 in College Teaching
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
College Teaching
- Publication date
2021-09-02
- Fields of study
Education, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-20 of 20 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-3 of 3 citing papers · Page 1 of 1