A meta-analysis of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Medical Oncology

• Publication date

  2011-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s12032-010-9549-5PMID 20458560
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

  2008cited by this paper
• Five-year Results

  2008cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic resection of extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a comparative analysis with open resection

  2008cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials on recurrence.

  2008cited by this paper
• Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer

  2008cited by this paper
• Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

  2007cited by this paper
• Oncologic Results of Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery for Stage II or III Left-Sided Colon Cancers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  2006cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic vs. Open Colectomy in Cancer Patients: Long-Term Complications, Quality of Life, and Survival

  2005cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

  2005cited by this paper
• Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

  2005cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis of short‐term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer

  2004cited by this paper
• The Clinical Outcome of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon Cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050-2059

  2004cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer

  2004cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

  2004cited by this paper
• A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

  2004cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

  2004cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic-Assisted vs. Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial

  2004cited by this paper
• Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

  2004cited by this paper
• Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

  2003cited by this paper
• Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial.

  2003cited by this paper
• Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

  2002cited by this paper
• Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy

  2002cited by this paper
• Oncologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced colorectal cancer.

  2001cited by this paper
• Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer

  2001cited by this paper
• Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma

  2000cited by this paper
• Wound recurrences following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer.

  2000cited by this paper
• Surgical Stress Response: Does Endoscopic Surgery Confer an Advantage?

  1999cited by this paper
• Is the port site really at risk? Biology, mechanisms and prevention: a critical view.

  1999cited by this paper
• Laparotomy and laparoscopy differentially accelerate experimental flank tumour growth

  1998cited by this paper
• A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report.

  1998cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic surgery is associated with less tumour growth stimulation than conventional surgery: An experimental study

  1997cited by this paper
• Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma

  1997cited by this paper
• The problem of port-site metastases after laparoscopic cancer surgery.

  1997cited by this paper
• Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma

  1997cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up.

  1996cited by this paper
• Surgical stress induces a shift in the type-1/type-2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting down-regulation of cell-mediated and up-regulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma.

  1996cited by this paper
• Prospective comparison of openvs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma

  1996cited by this paper
• Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection

  1996cited by this paper
• Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy

  1995cited by this paper
• A prospective randomized trial

  1995cited by this paper
• Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy.

  1994cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic general surgery.

  1994influential reference
• Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence.

  1993cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic colectomy.

  1992cited by this paper
• Prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhosis.

  1991cited by this paper
• A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club.

  1991cited by this paper
• The increase in immunosuppression and its role in the development of malignant lesions

  1985cited by this paper
• Altered helper and suppressor lymphocyte populations in surgical patients. A measure of postoperative immunosuppression.

  1984cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : short-term outcomes of a randomised trial

  year unknowncited by this paper

• A MEMS on Fiber Multisensor Platform for Surgical Assistance

  2026cites this paper
• The Role of Chinese Medicine as a Complementary Therapy in the Management of Obesity-Associated Colorectal Cancer.

  2025cites this paper
• Comparisons of postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery using inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis: an evidence from Iran

  2024cites this paper
• Treatment of patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer is less strenuous: a nationwide cohort study with long-term follow-up.

  2024cites this paper
• Less Invasive Primary Treatment for Colorectal Cancer After Implementation of National Screening: A Nationwide Cohort Study

  2023cites this paper
• Laparoscopic synchronous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases: A case report and review of the literature

  2022cites this paper
• Increasing rates of laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery and decreasing rates of surgical site infections: an observational study in Japan from 2012–2017

  2021cites this paper
• Laparoscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer

  2021influential citation
• Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer

  2021cites this paper
• Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy in Right Colon Carcinoma

  2020cites this paper
• Correction to: Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort

  2019cites this paper
• Analysis on The Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

  2019cites this paper
• Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort

  2019cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Small Bowel Surgery

  2019cites this paper
• Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

  2019cites this paper
• Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer

  2018cites this paper
• Is preoperative spirometry a predictive marker for postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery?

  2017cites this paper
• Autonomic dysfunction and perioperative outcome

  2017cites this paper
• The importance of the mesofascial interface in complete mesocolic excision.

  2017cites this paper
• Minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery: The ideal combination?

  2017cites this paper
• Primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer: what has changed?

  2017cites this paper
• Laparoscopy and laparotomy for colorectal cancer: a comparative single-center study

  2016cites this paper
• Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical management of colon cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Colorectal Cancer Study Group by the HeSMO*

  2016cites this paper
• Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: A critical analysis of diagnostic work‐up and operative approach

  2016cites this paper
• Laparoscopic and open surgery with D3-lymphadenectomy in patients with left-sided colon cancer: clinical and pathological parallels

  2016cites this paper
• Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer: an evidence-based analysis

  2016cites this paper
• Major postoperative complications following elective resection for colorectal cancer decrease long‐term survival but not the time to recurrence

  2015cites this paper
• Colorectal surgery in a rural setting

  2015cites this paper
• Specimen Extraction from the Defunctioning Ileostomy Site or Pfannenstiel Incision During Total Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Quality evaluation of randomized controlled trials reports of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Complete mesocolic excision: Techniques and outcomes.

  2015cites this paper
• Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer.

  2014cites this paper
• Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials

  2014cites this paper
• Long‐term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

  2014cites this paper
• Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review

  2014cites this paper
• No advantages of laparoscopy for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction compared with open colorectal resection in both short-term and long-term outcomes

  2014cites this paper
• Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal resection and pulmonary resection by minithoracotomy: Report of four cases

  2014cites this paper
• Conversion-to-open of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: Impact on outcomes

  2014cites this paper
• Grand Challenge: On the Way to Scarless Visceral Surgery

  2014cites this paper
• Colon Cancer

  2014cites this paper
• Early results after robot-assisted colorectal surgery.

  2013cites this paper
• Intraocular pressure variation during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: standard pneumoperitoneum leads to reversible elevation in intraocular pressure

  2013cites this paper
• Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a literature review and recommendations from the Comité de l'évolution des pratiques en oncologie.

  2013cites this paper
• Selective sensitization of tumors to chemotherapy by marine-derived lipids: a review.

  2013cites this paper
• Single-incision laparoscopic versus traditional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery—a cumulative meta-analysis and systematic review

  2013cites this paper
• Surgery for small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Is there any benefit of the laparoscopic approach?

  2013cites this paper
• Laparoscopy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer reduces short-term morbidity: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2013cites this paper
• A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and non‐randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Randomised trials in surgery: the burden of evidence.

  2012cites this paper
• Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Disease, Focusing on Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

  2012cites this paper
• Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach

  2012cites this paper
• Exploring indications for laparoscopic primary tumor resection in metastatic colorectal cancer

  2011cites this paper
• Laparascopic colon resection for cancer: evidence based results.

  2010cites this paper
• Targeting enzymes as drug targets: recent advances and future perspectives

  year unknowncites this paper