On the Power of Confession Evidence: An Experimental Test of the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1997

• Venue

  Law and Human Behavior

• Publication date

  1997-10-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1023/A:1024871622490PMID 9374602
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Coerced Confessions and the Jury: An Experimental Test of the “Harmless Error” Rule

  1997cited by this paper
• THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONFESSION EVIDENCE

  1997cited by this paper
• Psychological issues in eyewitness identification.

  1996cited by this paper
• Modern evidence : doctrine and practice

  1995cited by this paper
• The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making

  1995cited by this paper
• First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials

  1995cited by this paper
• The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory.

  1995cited by this paper
• The psychology of attitudes.

  1993cited by this paper
• Confessions in the courtroom

  1993cited by this paper
• What do we know about eyewitness identification?

  1993cited by this paper
• Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions

  1990cited by this paper
• The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts.

  1989cited by this paper
• Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change

  1988cited by this paper
• On the inefficacy of limiting instructions

  1985cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure

  1985cited by this paper
• When crimes are joined at trial

  1985cited by this paper
• Biases In Trials Involving Defendants Charged With Multiple Offenses1

  1982cited by this paper
• Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement.

  1981cited by this paper
• On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.

  1979cited by this paper
• Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberations of Simulated Juries

  1976cited by this paper
• Modern Criminal Procedure

  1970cited by this paper
• The American Jury

  1967cited by this paper
• Handbook of the law of evidence

  1955cited by this paper

• Recalibrating the risk of false confession wrongful convictions: Interrogation tactics and inverse probability

  2026cites this paper
• “You’ve got the wrong Shorty!”: Further insights into the legal misconceptions that cause transcript injustice in forensic contexts

  2025cites this paper
• Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations.

  2025cites this paper
• False Confessions: A Study Space Analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Mechanisms of Self-Regulatory Decline in Accusatorial Interrogations

  2025cites this paper
• Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A systematic review update and extension

  2024cites this paper
• A systematic review of the validity of Criteria-based Content Analysis in child sexual abuse cases and other field studies

  2024cites this paper
• PROTOCOL: Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: An update and extension

  2023cites this paper
• Concerns and recommendations regarding the training of school administrators in interrogating students

  2023cites this paper
• Reading and Walking with Smart Glasses: Effects of Display and Control Modes on Safety

  2023cites this paper
• Studying Confessions: A Confederate-Free, Cheating-Based Laboratory Research Paradigm

  2023cites this paper
• Confession evidence results in more true and false guilty pleas than eyewitness evidence

  2023cites this paper
• How Important is Developmental Maturity in Assessing Whether Adolescents Will Share True or False Accounts of a First Offense in Legal Interactions?

  2023cites this paper
• Confession During Police Interrogation: a Decision Tree Analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Where is the Evidence? Comparing the Effects of Evidence Strength and Demographic Characteristics on Plea Discounts

  2022cites this paper
• Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.

  2022cites this paper
• High eyewitness confidence is always compelling: that’s a problem

  2022cites this paper
• The Language of Criminal Confessions : A Corpus Analysis of Confessions Presumed True vs . Proven False

  2021cites this paper
• Being Easy to Communicate Might Make Verdicts Based on Confessions More Legitimate

  2021cites this paper
• How Interrogation Length, Age, and Crime Impact Perceptions of Evidence in Criminal Trials

  2021influential citation
• The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Perceptions of Recanted Confessions

  2021cites this paper
• Minimierende und maximierende Vernehmungstaktiken: Risiko falscher Geständnisse und sozialpsychologische Wirkmechanismen

  2021cites this paper
• Sensitivity to Psychologically Coercive Interrogations: A Comparison of Instructions and Expert Testimony to Improve Juror Decision-Making

  2021cites this paper
• Beyond Common Sense and Human Experience: Lay Perceptions of Witness Coercion

  2020cites this paper
• How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt

  2020cites this paper
• Facteurs explicatifs de la confession en contexte d’interrogatoire policier : une analyse d’arbres décisionnels

  2020cites this paper
• Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond

  2020cites this paper
• From Suspect Statement to Legal Decision Making

  2020cites this paper
• Mock Jurors' Sensitivity to Investigator Bias

  2020cites this paper
• The effects of variations in confession evidence and need for cognition on jurors’ decisions.

  2020cites this paper
• The variable influence of confession inconsistencies: How factual errors (but not contradictions) reduce belief in suspect guilt

  2020cites this paper
• Intellectual Disability Affects Case Judgment Differently Depending on Juvenile Race

  2020cites this paper
• Art or Confession?: Evaluating Rap Lyrics as Evidence in Criminal Cases

  2020cites this paper
• When Do False Accusations Lead to False Confessions? Preliminary Evidence for a Potentially Overlooked Alternative Explanation

  2020cites this paper
• Incentivized to Testify: Informant Witnesses

  2020cites this paper
• False admissions of guilt associated with wrongful convictions undermine people’s perceptions of exonerees.

  2020cites this paper
• Do laypeople recognize youth as a risk factor for false confession? A test of the ‘common sense’ hypothesis

  2020cites this paper
• The Case for the Abolition of Criminal Confessions

  2020cites this paper
• Investigations: Negligence

  2020cites this paper
• How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.

  2019cites this paper
• What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?

  2019cites this paper
• Juror Perceptions of Intoxicated Suspects’ Interrogation-Related Behaviors

  2019cites this paper
• Linguistic Features of False Confessions and Confessions Not in Dispute: A Corpus Analysis

  2019cites this paper
• Perceptions of juvenile confessions as a function of police report and questioning quality

  2019cites this paper
• Stigma against false confessors impacts post-exoneration financial compensation.

  2019cites this paper
• Running Head: OUTCOME KNOWLEDGE IN SUSPECT INTERVIEWS The Role of Outcome Knowledge in the Assessment of Suspect Interviews N. Brömmelhaus

  2018cites this paper
• Are Jurors’ Judgments about Confessions Affected by Juvenile Defendant Race?

  2018influential citation
• What U.S Defense Attorneys Know About Facial Composites

  2018cites this paper
• Review of Research and Recent Case Law on Understanding and Appreciation of Miranda Warnings

  2018cites this paper
• Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.

  2018cites this paper
• Perceptions of suspect statements: a comparison of exposed lies and confessions

  2018cites this paper
• Police Interrogation and Suspect Confessions

  2018cites this paper
• Secondary Confessions as Post-identification Feedback: How Jailhouse Informant Testimony Can Alter Eyewitnesses’ Identification Decisions

  2018cites this paper
• Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges

  2018cites this paper
• Assessing Instructed Feigner's Response to the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale

  2018cites this paper
• Secondary Confessions as Post-identification Feedback: How Jailhouse Informant Testimony Can Alter Eyewitnesses’ Identification Decisions

  2018cites this paper
• The Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview© - A Meta-Analytic Review and Empirical Study with Older Adult Witnesses

  2018cites this paper
• A Survey of Potential Jurors’ Perceptions of Interrogations and Confessions

  2018cites this paper
• The Mr. Big technique on trial by jury

  2018cites this paper
• ‘Guilty, no doubt’: detention provoking confirmation bias in judges’ guilt assessments and debiasing techniques

  2018cites this paper
• Imagination or Proof: The Use of Imagery and False Evidence in Eliciting Internalized False Confessions

  2018cites this paper
• Belief perseverance: The staying power of confession evidence

  2018cites this paper
• Research-Based Instructions Induce Sensitivity to Confession Evidence

  2018cites this paper
• Dodging Self-Incriminations: An Examination of Feigned Miranda Abilities on the SAMA

  2017cites this paper
• Individual Differences in Correspondence Bias: Measurement, Consequences, and Correction of Biased Interpersonal Attributions

  2017cites this paper
• Cognitive bias and forensic anthropology: the power of context in the interpretation of skeletal remains

  2017cites this paper
• The influence of hypothesis disconfirmation on attribution error in juror perceptions of confession evidence

  2017cites this paper
• False confessions.

  2017cites this paper
• Automatically Guilty: Associations between Evidence and Guilt

  2017cites this paper
• Les motivations à la non-confession en contexte d'interrogatoire policier : exploration des profils explicatifs de la non-confession dans le cas d'individus reconnus coupables d'un crime

  2017cites this paper
• The Influence of Confessions on Guilty Pleas and Plea Discounts

  2017influential citation
• Attributions in the courtroom: the influence of race, incentive, and witness type on jurors’ perceptions of secondary confessions

  2017cites this paper
• Persuasión en el interrogatorio policial: una revisión sistemática

  2017influential citation
• Japanese Interrogation Techniques From Prisoners’ Perspectives

  2016cites this paper
• When Self-Report Trumps Science

  2016cites this paper
• Applying Deception Detection to True and False Confessions: a Novel Approach to Conducting Experiments in Legal Psychology

  2016cites this paper
• Plea decision-making by attorneys and judges

  2016cites this paper
• Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.

  2016cites this paper
• Examining the judicial decision to substitute credibility instructions for expert testimony on confessions

  2016cites this paper
• Lost proof of innocence: The impact of confessions on alibi witnesses.

  2016cites this paper
• The Feasibility of Expanding the Jury Pool in Hong Kong

  2016cites this paper
• The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.

  2016cites this paper
• Can Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to Coercive Interrogation Tactics?

  2016cites this paper
• The Purpose, Content, and Effects of Expert Testimony on Interrogations and Confessions

  2016cites this paper
• When Snitches Corroborate: Effects of Post-identification Feedback from a Potentially Compromised Source

  2016cites this paper
• Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?

  2016cites this paper
• Experienced and novice officers' generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments.

  2016cites this paper
• Increasing the Elicitation of Truthful Information From Young Suspects: An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Temporal Discounting

  2016cites this paper
• Does it matter how you deny it?: The role of demeanour in evaluations of criminal suspects

  2016cites this paper
• When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA, and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt.

  2016cites this paper
• Statements from Youth in Legal Contexts: Effects of Consistency, Legal Role, and Age.

  2016cites this paper
• Taking the blame for someone else's wrongdoing: The effects of age and reciprocity.

  2015cites this paper
• Overlooking coerciveness: The impact of interrogation techniques and guilt corroboration on jurors’ judgments of coerciveness

  2015cites this paper
• CRIMINAL CONFESSIONS ON VIDEOTAPE : DOES CAMERA PERSPECTIVE BIAS THEIR PERCEIVED VERACITY ?

  2015cites this paper
• Evaluating the probative value of facial composites by laypeople and prosecutor apprentices

  2015cites this paper
• Behind the Confession: Relating False Confession, Interrogative Compliance, Personality Traits, and Psychopathy

  2015cites this paper
• The Social Psychology of False Confessions

  2015cites this paper
• “Labelled a murderer”- A discursive analysis of Amanda Knox’s construction of innocence

  2015cites this paper
• One Country, Two Cultures

  2015influential citation
• Police interviewing and interrogation of juvenile suspects: a descriptive examination of actual cases.

  2014cites this paper