Normative and descriptive models have long vied to explain and predict human risky choices, such as those between goods or gambles. A recent study reported the discovery of a new, more accurate model of human decision-making by training neural networks on a new online large-scale dataset, choices13k. Here we systematically analyse the relationships between several models and datasets using machine-learning methods and find evidence for dataset bias. Because participants’ choices in stochastically dominated gambles were consistently skewed towards equipreference in the choices13k dataset, we hypothesized that this reflected increased decision noise. Indeed, a probabilistic generative model adding structured decision noise to a neural network trained on data from a laboratory study transferred best, that is, outperformed all models apart from those trained on choices13k. We conclude that a careful combination of theory and data analysis is still required to understand the complex interactions of machine-learning models and data of human risky choices. Thomas et al. examine how dataset effects may limit the generalizability of machine learning-based models of human choice.
Modelling dataset bias in machine-learned theories of economic decision-making
Tobi Thomas,Dominik Straub,Fabian Tatai,Megan Shene,Tümer Tosik,Kristian Kersting,C. Rothkopf
Published 2024 in Nature Human Behaviour
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2024
- Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
- Publication date
2024-01-12
- Fields of study
Medicine, Computer Science, Economics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-76 of 76 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-8 of 8 citing papers · Page 1 of 1