A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching.

Ideal partner preferences (i.e., ratings of the desirability of attributes like attractiveness or intelligence) are the source of numerous foundational findings in the interdisciplinary literature on human mating. Recently, research on the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching (i.e., Do people positively evaluate partners who match vs. mismatch their ideals?) has become mired in several problems. First, articles exhibit discrepant analytic and reporting practices. Second, different findings emerge across laboratories worldwide, perhaps because they sample different relationship contexts and/or populations. This registered report-partnered with the Psychological Science Accelerator-uses a highly powered design (N = 10,358) across 43 countries and 22 languages to estimate preference-matching effect sizes. The most rigorous tests revealed significant preference-matching effects in the whole sample and for partnered and single participants separately. The "corrected pattern metric" that collapses across 35 traits revealed a zero-order effect of β = .19 and an effect of β = .11 when included alongside a normative preference-matching metric. Specific traits in the "level metric" (interaction) tests revealed very small (average β = .04) effects. Effect sizes were similar for partnered participants who reported ideals before entering a relationship, and there was no consistent evidence that individual differences moderated any effects. Comparisons between stated and revealed preferences shed light on gender differences and similarities: For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. Implications for the literature on human mating are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

• Publication date

  2024-10-31

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/pspp0000524PMID 39480282PMCID PMC12622239
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions

  2023influential reference
• Probing the predictive validity of ideal partner preferences for future partner traits and relationship outcomes across 13 years

  2023cited by this paper
• r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models

  2022cited by this paper
• Experiences of Romantic Attraction Are Similar Across Dating Apps and Offline Dates in Young Adults

  2022cited by this paper
• A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration.

  2022cited by this paper
• Predicting romantic interest during early relationship development: A preregistered investigation using machine learning

  2022cited by this paper
• Mate evaluation theory.

  2022cited by this paper
• Does mate preference represent mate choice? A cross-cultural investigation.

  2021cited by this paper
• Evaluating CloudResearch’s Approved Group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk

  2021influential reference
• A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect

  2021cited by this paper
• We’re Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships

  2021cited by this paper
• The detriments of unmet sexual ideals and buffering effect of sexual communal strength.

  2021cited by this paper
• That’s a Lot to Process! Pitfalls of Popular Path Models

  2021cited by this paper
• Negligible evidence that people desire partners who uniquely fit their ideals

  2020influential reference
• Reconsidering “Best Practices” for Testing the Ideal Standards Model: A Response to Eastwick, Finkel, and Simpson (2018)

  2020influential reference
• The Association Between Romantic Rejection and Change in Ideal Standards, Ideal Flexibility, and Self-Perceived Mate Value

  2020cited by this paper
• Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects

  2020cited by this paper
• Culture Moderates the Normative and Distinctive Impact of Parents and Similarity on Young Adults’ Partner Preferences

  2020cited by this paper
• A Multi-Lab Test of the Facial Feedback Hypothesis by The Many Smiles Collaboration

  2019cited by this paper
• Exploring the Relative Importance of Normative and Distinctive Organizational Preferences as Predictors of Work Attitudes

  2019cited by this paper
• Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.

  2019cited by this paper
• Preference

  2019cited by this paper
• Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures.

  2019cited by this paper
• How do people translate their experiences into abstract attribute preferences?

  2019cited by this paper
• Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships

  2019cited by this paper
• Best Practices for Testing the Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preference-Matching

  2018cited by this paper
• Assessment of similarity and self-other agreement in dyadic relationships

  2018influential reference
• Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat

  2018cited by this paper
• A Rosier Reality: Incongruency in Stated and Revealed Ingroup Preferences among Young Asian American Speed Daters

  2018cited by this paper
• Epistemic companions: shared reality development in close relationships.

  2018cited by this paper
• Toward an Integrative Framework for Studying Human Evaluation: Attitudes Toward Objects and Attributes

  2018cited by this paper
• The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network

  2018cited by this paper
• Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects

  2017cited by this paper
• Equivalence Tests

  2017cited by this paper
• Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Predictive Validity and Adjustment of Ideal Partner Preferences Across the Transition Into Romantic Relationships

  2017influential reference
• Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality

  2017cited by this paper
• Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross‐cultural differences

  2017cited by this paper
• Similarity in Relationships as Niche Construction: Choice, Stability, and Influence Within Dyads in a Free Choice Environment

  2017cited by this paper
• Preferences in the Early Stages of Mate Choice

  2016cited by this paper
• What Do You Want in a Marriage? Examining Marriage Ideals in Taiwan and the United States

  2016cited by this paper
• Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.

  2016cited by this paper
• Registered Replication Report

  2016cited by this paper
• The Correlates of Similarity Estimates Are Often Misleadingly Positive

  2016cited by this paper
• What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies?

  2016cited by this paper
• Initial Evidence that Individuals Form New Relationships with Partners that More Closely Match their Ideal Preferences

  2016cited by this paper
• Physical Attractiveness in Adaptationist Perspective.

  2015influential reference
• The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence

  2015influential reference
• Relationship Satisfaction as a Function of Mate Value

  2015cited by this paper
• Not All Ideals are Equal: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Ideals in Relationships.

  2015cited by this paper
• Predicting Romantic Interest and Decisions in the Very Early Stages of Mate Selection

  2014cited by this paper
• Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review.

  2014cited by this paper
• Is a meta-analysis a foundation, or just another brick? Comment on Meltzer, McNulty, Jackson, and Karney (2014).

  2014cited by this paper
• Endorsing benevolent sexism magnifies willingness to dissolve relationships when facing partner-ideal discrepancies

  2014cited by this paper
• The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis.

  2014influential reference
• Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.

  2014cited by this paper
• Inferring a partner's ideal discrepancies: accuracy, projection, and the communicative role of interpersonal behavior.

  2013cited by this paper
• Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.

  2013cited by this paper
• Sensory evaluation of food principles and practices

  2013cited by this paper
• Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships.

  2012cited by this paper
• Measuring up: the unique emotional and regulatory outcomes of different perceived partner-ideal discrepancies in romantic relationships.

  2012cited by this paper
• lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling

  2012cited by this paper
• Do Ideal Partner Preferences Predict Divorce? A Tale of Two Metrics

  2012cited by this paper
• Attachment styles and relationship quality: Actual, perceived, and ideal partner matching

  2012cited by this paper
• Mate-preference drives mate-choice: Men’s self-rated masculinity predicts their female partner’s preference for masculinity

  2011cited by this paper
• When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?

  2011cited by this paper
• Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.

  2011cited by this paper
• Tempting Fate or Inviting Happiness?

  2011cited by this paper
• MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R

  2011cited by this paper
• Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study

  2011cited by this paper
• The Social Accuracy Model of Interpersonal Perception: Assessing Individual Differences in Perceptive and Expressive Accuracy

  2010cited by this paper
• How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?

  2010cited by this paper
• Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality.

  2010cited by this paper
• What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating

  2010cited by this paper
• Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: The role of ideals in romantic partner selection and retention

  2009cited by this paper
• Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.

  2009cited by this paper
• Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?

  2008influential reference
• Toward a fuller conception of Machismo: Development of a traditional Machismo and Caballerismo Scale.

  2008cited by this paper
• The Structure and Function of Ideal Standards in Close Relationships

  2007cited by this paper
• Emotional Experience in Close Relationships

  2007cited by this paper
• Cross-cultural personality research: Conceptual and methodological issues.

  2007cited by this paper
• Do advertised preferences predict the behavior of speed daters

  2007cited by this paper
• Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences

  2007cited by this paper
• The nature of adult twin relationships: an attachment-theoretical perspective.

  2006cited by this paper
• Regulation processes in intimate relationships: the role of ideal standards.

  2006cited by this paper
• Ideal mate personality concepts and compatibility in close relationships: a longitudinal analysis.

  2005cited by this paper
• The Dynamic Structure of Relationship Perceptions: Differential Importance as a Strategy of Relationship Maintenance

  2003cited by this paper
• A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains

  2003cited by this paper
• Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: does commitment promote forgiveness?

  2002cited by this paper
• Ideal Standards, the Self, and Flexibility of Ideals in Close Relationships

  2001cited by this paper
• Implicit Theories of Relationships: Who Cares if Romantic Partners Are Less than Ideal?

  2001cited by this paper
• Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development.

  2000cited by this paper
• Ideals in intimate relationships.

  1999influential reference
• The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size

  1998cited by this paper
• Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism

  1998influential reference
• For Better or for Worse: Real-Ideal Discrepancies and the Marital Well-Being of Newlyweds

  1997cited by this paper
• Multiple Testing and Statistical Power With Modified Bonferroni Procedures

  1997cited by this paper
• Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction.

  1997cited by this paper
• The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: love is not blind, but prescient.

  1996cited by this paper
• Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels

  1993cited by this paper
• The structure of phenotypic personality traits.

  1993cited by this paper

• The Relative Importance of Attractiveness and Intelligence to the Mate Preferences and Choices of Women and Their Parents

  2025cites this paper
• No gender differences in attraction to young partners: A study of 4500 blind dates

  2025cites this paper
• A Credibility Revolution for Relationship Science: Where Can We Step Up Our Game?

  2025cites this paper
• Experimental Tests of the Role of Ideal Partner Preferences in Relationships.

  2025cites this paper
• Will AI Tell Lies to Save Sick Children? Litmus-Testing AI Values Prioritization with AIRiskDilemmas

  2025cites this paper
• Effects of sexually objectifying gaze on women's self‐sexualization in a mating context: The tradeoff between safety pursuit and resource pursuit

  2025cites this paper
• Cross-cultural data on romantic love and mate preferences from 117,293 participants across 175 countries

  2025cites this paper
• Diverse Gender and Sexual Identity in Romantic Partner Selection Experiences: An Exploration of Similarities, Differences, and Potential Explanations

  2025cites this paper
• Sexual partner number and distribution over time affect long-term partner evaluation: evidence from 11 countries across 5 continents

  2025cites this paper
• A hundred and two just-so stories: exploring the lay evolutionary hypotheses of the manosphere

  2025cites this paper
• Is Family Size Related To Love? Data from 25 Countries

  2025cites this paper
• Toward a science of relationship forecasting: Considerations and recommendations.

  2025cites this paper
• Would You Really Want a Superior Partner? The Puzzle of Romantic Equality

  2025cites this paper