Vibration-based condition monitoring is a well-developed and established field in maintenance engineering. Failure prognosis is a crucial aspect of condition monitoring, particularly Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction. Over the last decade, the PRONOSTIA bearing dataset has become the standard reference for testing these prognostic algorithms. However, the lack of standardized comparisons makes it difficult to objectively assess the relative performance of different methods. This paper systematically compares three established data-driven artificial intelligence approaches: classical machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning approaches. We analyze their application to the PRONOSTIA dataset, providing detailed discussions of their relative strengths, limitations, and achieved performance. While this study primarily serves as a benchmark for testing new prognostic algorithms in vibration monitoring, we hope the insights will also broadly apply to other condition-monitoring techniques.
Bearing Prognostics Using the PRONOSTIA Data: A Comparative Study
Hariom Dhungana,Thorstein H. Rykkje,Alexander S. Lundervold
Published 2025 in IEEE Access
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
IEEE Access
- Publication date
Unknown publication date
- Fields of study
Computer Science, Engineering
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
Showing 1-3 of 3 citing papers · Page 1 of 1