Leveraging passive acoustic monitoring for result-based agri-environmental schemes: Opportunities, challenges and next steps

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Biological Conservation

• Publication date

  2025-05-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111042
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Worldwide Soundscapes: A Synthesis of Passive Acoustic Monitoring Across Realms

  2025cited by this paper
• Diel and seasonal vocal activity patterns revealed by passive acoustic monitoring suggest expert recommendations for breeding bird surveys need adjustment

  2025cited by this paper
• A ready-to use workflow for automated, sound-based bird identification and localization

  2024cited by this paper
• Using automated passive acoustic monitoring to measure changes in bird and bat vocal activity around hedgerows of different ages

  2024cited by this paper
• Decomposing drivers in avian insectivory: large-scale effects of climate, habitat and bird diversity

  2024cited by this paper
• Using mobile acoustic monitoring and false‐positive N‐mixture models to estimate bat abundance and population trends

  2024cited by this paper
• Harnessing virtual fencing for more effective and adaptive agri-environment schemes to conserve grassland biodiversity

  2024cited by this paper
• Spatial ecosystem monitoring with a Multichannel Acoustic Autonomous Recording Unit (MAARU)

  2024cited by this paper
• Buzzfindr: Automating the detection of feeding buzzes in bat echolocation recordings

  2024cited by this paper
• Acoustic detection rate can outperform traditional survey approaches in estimating relative densities of breeding waders

  2024cited by this paper
• Understanding acoustic indices as multi-taxa biodiversity and habitat quality indicators

  2024cited by this paper
• Improving result-based schemes for nature conservation in agricultural landscapes—challenges and best practices from selected European countries

  2024cited by this paper
• Multi-year soundscape recordings and automated call detection reveals varied impact of moonlight on calling activity of neotropical forest katydids

  2024cited by this paper
• Exploring potential relationships between acoustic indices and ecosystem functions: a test on insect herbivory

  2024cited by this paper
• AI-enabled IoT-based pest prevention and controlling system using sound analytics in large agricultural field

  2024cited by this paper
• Acoustic indices are responsive to local-scale but not landscape-scale agricultural land use

  2024cited by this paper
• Comparing practice‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental schemes controlled by remote sensing: An application to olive groves in Spain

  2024cited by this paper
• How values and perceptions shape farmers' biodiversity management: Insights from ten European countries

  2024cited by this paper
• Guidelines for appropriate use of BirdNET scores and other detector outputs

  2024cited by this paper
• A scalable and transferable approach to combining emerging conservation technologies to identify biodiversity change after large disturbances

  2024cited by this paper
• Species diversity and interspecific information flow

  2024cited by this paper
• Passive acoustic monitoring and automated detection of the American bullfrog

  2024cited by this paper
• Aquatic Soundscape Recordings Reveal Diverse Vocalizations and Nocturnal Activity of an Endangered Frog

  2024cited by this paper
• Listening to the response of bat and bush‐cricket communities to management regimes of powerline clearings

  2024cited by this paper
• Cost-effectiveness of state-dependent versus state-independent agri-environment schemes for biodiversity conservation

  2024cited by this paper
• Acoustic indices track local vertebrate biodiversity in a subtropical landscape

  2024cited by this paper
• Systematic review of machine learning methods applied to ecoacoustics and soundscape monitoring

  2023cited by this paper
• Assessing the potential of BirdNET to infer European bird communities from large-scale ecoacoustic data

  2023cited by this paper
• Novel community data in ecology-properties and prospects.

  2023cited by this paper
• Large‐scale bioacoustic monitoring to elucidate the distribution of a non‐native katydid

  2023cited by this paper
• Monitoring costs of result-based payments for biodiversity conservation: Will UAV-assisted remote sensing be the game-changer?

  2023cited by this paper
• Will passive acoustic monitoring make result‐based payments more attractive? A cost comparison with human observation for farmland bird monitoring

  2023cited by this paper
• Adoption and potential of agri‐environmental schemes in Europe: Cross‐regional evidence from interviews with farmers

  2023cited by this paper
• Deep Learning for Recognizing Bat Species and Bat Behavior in Audio Recordings

  2023cited by this paper
• Transition to organic farming negatively affects bat activity

  2023cited by this paper
• Open‐source workflow approaches to passive acoustic monitoring of bats

  2023cited by this paper
• Multitrophic biodiversity enhances ecosystem functions, services and ecological intensification in agriculture

  2023cited by this paper
• Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe

  2023cited by this paper
• Soundscape components inform acoustic index patterns and refine estimates of bird species richness

  2023cited by this paper
• Implementing the EU eco‐scheme in the Netherlands: A results‐based points system approach

  2023cited by this paper
• Passive monitoring of avian habitat on working lands.

  2023cited by this paper
• Large‐scale long‐term passive‐acoustic monitoring reveals spatio‐temporal activity patterns of boreal bats

  2023cited by this paper
• The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri‐environmental schemes: A systematic review

  2023cited by this paper
• Optimizing Agri-Environment Schemes for Cost-Effectiveness, Fairness or Both?

  2023cited by this paper
• BirdNET : applications, performance, pitfalls and future opportunities

  2023cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of acoustic indices as indicators of vertebrate biodiversity

  2023cited by this paper
• Biodiversity indicators for result-based agri-environmental schemes – Current state and future prospects

  2023cited by this paper
• Towards a General Approach for Bat Echolocation Detection and Classification

  2022cited by this paper
• Which interventions contribute most to the net effect of England’s agri-environment schemes on pollination services?

  2022cited by this paper
• Call rate as an index of nest count in wading bird colonies

  2022cited by this paper
• Physics‐based model to predict the acoustic detection distance of terrestrial autonomous recording units over the diel cycle and across seasons: Insights from an Alpine and a Neotropical forest

  2022cited by this paper
• Co‐design: Working with farmers in Europe to halt the loss of biological diversity

  2022cited by this paper
• Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis

  2022cited by this paper
• Landscape-level heterogeneity of agri-environment measures improves habitat suitability for farmland birds.

  2022cited by this paper
• Not only hedgerows, but also flower fields can enhance bat activity in intensively used agricultural landscapes

  2022cited by this paper
• Listening in the dark: acoustics indices reveal bat species diversity in a tropical savannah

  2022cited by this paper
• Individual contributions to group chorus dynamics influence access to mating opportunities in wood frogs.

  2022cited by this paper
• Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective

  2022cited by this paper
• Farmers’ preferences toward an outcome‐based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan

  2022cited by this paper
• Land-use intensity and landscape structure drive the acoustic composition of grasslands

  2022cited by this paper
• Linking acoustic diversity to compositional and configurational heterogeneity in mosaic landscapes

  2022cited by this paper
• Grand Challenges in Acoustic Remote Sensing: Discoveries to Support a Better Understanding of Our Changing Planet

  2022cited by this paper
• Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring.

  2022cited by this paper
• Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities

  2022cited by this paper
• Voice activity detection in eco‐acoustic data enables privacy protection and is a proxy for human disturbance

  2022cited by this paper
• Sustainable agricultural practices for food security and ecosystem services

  2022cited by this paper
• Estimating the diversity of tropical anurans in fragmented landscapes with acoustic monitoring: lessons from a sampling sufficiency perspective

  2022cited by this paper
• Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: an application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior

  2021cited by this paper
• BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring

  2021cited by this paper
• Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction

  2021cited by this paper
• Active or passive acoustic monitoring? Assessing methods to track anuran communities in tropical savanna wetlands

  2021cited by this paper
• Assessing the importance of field margins for bat species and communities in intensive agricultural landscapes

  2021cited by this paper
• Estimating bird density using passive acoustic monitoring: a review of methods and suggestions for further research

  2021cited by this paper
• Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in S witzerland

  2021cited by this paper
• Acoustic signalling in Orthoptera

  2021cited by this paper
• Advancing bird survey efforts through novel recorder technology and automated species identification

  2021cited by this paper
• Does agri-environmental management enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services?: A farm-scale experiment

  2021cited by this paper
• Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity

  2021cited by this paper
• Loss of vocal culture and fitness costs in a critically endangered songbird

  2021cited by this paper
• Survey coverage, recording duration and community composition affect observed species richness in passive acoustic surveys

  2020cited by this paper
• Combining bioacoustics and occupancy modelling for improved monitoring of rare breeding bird populations

  2020cited by this paper
• Vegetation encroachment drives changes in the composition of butterfly assemblages and species loss in Mediterranean ecosystems

  2020cited by this paper
• Rapid and varied responses of songbirds to climate change in California coniferous forests

  2020cited by this paper
• Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities

  2020cited by this paper
• Identification of different song types in the European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus

  2020cited by this paper
• Monitoring cave-dwelling bats using remote passive acoustic detectors: a new approach for cave monitoring

  2020cited by this paper
• A state-of-the-art review on birds as indicators of biodiversity: Advances, challenges, and future directions

  2020cited by this paper
• Automated species identification of frog choruses in environmental recordings using acoustic indices

  2020cited by this paper
• Agri‐environment schemes enhance pollinator richness and abundance but bumblebee reproduction depends on field size

  2020cited by this paper
• A review of conspecific attraction for habitat selection across taxa

  2020cited by this paper
• Utility of acoustic indices for ecological monitoring in complex sonic environments

  2020cited by this paper
• Farmer preferences for adopting precision farming technologies: a case study from Italy

  2020cited by this paper
• AudioMoth: A low-cost acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment

  2019cited by this paper
• Innate releasing mechanisms and fixed action patterns: basic ethological concepts as drivers for neuroethological studies on acoustic communication in Orthoptera

  2019cited by this paper
• Experience versus expectation: farmers’ perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe

  2019cited by this paper
• Autonomous sound recording outperforms human observation for sampling birds: a systematic map and user guide.

  2019cited by this paper
• A roadmap for survey designs in terrestrial acoustic monitoring

  2019cited by this paper
• Managing hedgerows for nocturnal wildlife: Do bats and their insect prey benefit from targeted agri‐environment schemes?

  2019cited by this paper
• The sound of management: Acoustic monitoring for agricultural industries

  2019cited by this paper
• Vocal activity rate index: a useful method to infer terrestrial bird abundance with acoustic monitoring

  2019cited by this paper

• Software Tools for Passive Acoustic Monitoring in Aquatic and Terrestrial Bio- and Ecoacoustics: A Living Systematic Review

  2026cites this paper
• Spatially-explicit biodiversity models help unpack the varying effectiveness of Agri-Environment Measures

  2025cites this paper