A Tale of Open Science: Emergence of a New Normal

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research

• Publication date

  2025-08-05

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s41471-025-00218-5
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• An Inception-Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies Are Publicly Shared

  2025cited by this paper
• AI and the advent of the cyborg behavioral scientist

  2025cited by this paper
• Value added to marketing research diagnoses by add-ons to p\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\varvec{p}

  2025cited by this paper
• Lower Artificial Intelligence Literacy Predicts Greater AI Receptivity

  2025cited by this paper
• A large-scale replication of scenario-based experiments in psychology and management using large language models

  2025cited by this paper
• Machine-assisted social psychology hypothesis generation.

  2024cited by this paper
• Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly

  2024cited by this paper
• AI–Human Hybrids for Marketing Research: Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) as Collaborators

  2024cited by this paper
• Toward open science in marketing research

  2024influential reference
• Using theoretical constraints and the TASI taxonomy to delineate predictably replicable findings

  2024cited by this paper
• A Student’s Guide to Open Science: Using the Replication Crisis to Reform Psychology

  2024cited by this paper
• When and How to Deviate From a Preregistration

  2024cited by this paper
• Same model, same data, but different outcomes: Evaluating the impact of method choices in structural equation modeling

  2024cited by this paper
• Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research

  2024cited by this paper
• Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines

  2024cited by this paper
• Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results

  2024cited by this paper
• Revisiting and Rethinking the Identifiable Victim Effect: Replication and Extension of Small, Loewenstein, and Slovic (2007)

  2024cited by this paper
• The potential of preregistration in psychology: Assessing preregistration producibility and preregistration-study consistency.

  2024cited by this paper
• The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

  2024cited by this paper
• Intellectual property and data privacy: the hidden risks of AI.

  2024cited by this paper
• The Invisible Workload of Open Research

  2023cited by this paper
• Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration

  2023cited by this paper
• Learning from Data: An Empirics-First Approach to Relevant Knowledge Generation

  2023cited by this paper
• Transparency Is Now the Default at Psychological Science

  2023cited by this paper
• The Next Chapter for Psychological Science

  2023cited by this paper
• Generative language models exhibit social identity biases

  2023cited by this paper
• How ChatGPT is transforming the postdoc experience

  2023cited by this paper
• A Replication Study of Operations Management Experiments in Management Science

  2023cited by this paper
• Toward open science in PLS-SEM: Assessing the state of the art and future perspectives

  2023cited by this paper
• Replication games: how to make reproducibility research more systematic

  2023cited by this paper
• Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review

  2023cited by this paper
• Recent developments in Business Economics

  2023cited by this paper
• The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes

  2023cited by this paper
• A toolbox to evaluate the trustworthiness of published findings

  2023cited by this paper
• Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts

  2023cited by this paper
• An advanced method to streamline p-hacking

  2023cited by this paper
• No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias

  2022cited by this paper
• The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science

  2022influential reference
• Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project

  2022cited by this paper
• A Reexamination of the Impact of Decision Conflict on Choice Deferral

  2022cited by this paper
• Open science, closed doors: The perils and potential of open science for research in practice

  2022cited by this paper
• A Review of Multisite Replication Projects in Social Psychology: Is It Viable to Sustain Any Confidence in Social Psychology’s Knowledge Base?

  2022cited by this paper
• Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices

  2022cited by this paper
• Ten simple rules for writing a Registered Report

  2022cited by this paper
• Introducing Marketing Letters’ data policy

  2022cited by this paper
• Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences

  2022cited by this paper
• We Need to Talk About Mechanical Turk: What 22,989 Hypothesis Tests Tell Us About Publication Bias and P-Hacking in Online Experiments

  2022cited by this paper
• Nature is trialling transparent peer review — the early results are encouraging

  2022cited by this paper
• Build up big-team science

  2022cited by this paper
• A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

  2022cited by this paper
• Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty

  2022cited by this paper
• COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal

  2021cited by this paper
• Data Ownership: A Survey

  2021cited by this paper
• Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice

  2021cited by this paper
• Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value in research on the psychological consequences of scarcity

  2021cited by this paper
• Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies

  2021cited by this paper
• Are business and management journals anti-replication? An analysis of editorial policies

  2021cited by this paper
• Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints.

  2021cited by this paper
• A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect

  2021cited by this paper
• TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results From 288 Brands

  2021cited by this paper
• The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains

  2021cited by this paper
• Pre‐registration: Why and How

  2020cited by this paper
• The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis

  2020cited by this paper
• The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics

  2020cited by this paper
• Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication?

  2020cited by this paper
• Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk

  2020cited by this paper
• Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science

  2020cited by this paper
• Replicating Anomalies

  2020cited by this paper
• Does social psychology persist over half a century? A direct replication of Cialdini et al.'s (1975) classic door-in-the-face technique.

  2020cited by this paper
• Drivers and Obstacles of Open Access Publishing. A Qualitative Investigation of Individual and Institutional Factors

  2020cited by this paper
• The Realist Rationality of Evidence-Based Management

  2020cited by this paper
• Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Förster, Liberman, and Kuschel’s (2008) Study 1

  2020cited by this paper
• Pre‐registration is a Game Changer. But, Like Random Assignment, it is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient for Credible Science

  2020cited by this paper
• On Not Confusing the Tree of Trustworthy Statistics with the Greater Forest of Good Science: A Comment on Simmons et al.’s Perspective on Pre‐registration

  2020cited by this paper
• Reported Individual Costs and Benefits of Sharing Open Data among Canadian Academic Faculty in Ecology and Evolution

  2020cited by this paper
• A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints

  2020cited by this paper
• Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints.

  2020cited by this paper
• The past, present and future of Registered Reports

  2020influential reference
• Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review

  2019cited by this paper
• Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects

  2019cited by this paper
• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2019cited by this paper
• Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement

  2019cited by this paper
• The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals

  2019cited by this paper
• Guidelines for open peer review implementation

  2019cited by this paper
• Open Science Isn't Always Open to All Scientists

  2019cited by this paper
• Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments

  2019cited by this paper
• Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile.

  2019cited by this paper
• Addressing the theory crisis in psychology

  2019cited by this paper
• The citation advantage of linking publications to research data

  2019cited by this paper
• Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants

  2019cited by this paper
• Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition

  2018cited by this paper
• Registered Replication Report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008)

  2018cited by this paper
• On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective

  2018cited by this paper
• Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

  2018cited by this paper
• Mapping the universe of registered reports

  2018cited by this paper
• Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress

  2018cited by this paper
• Easy preregistration will benefit any research

  2018cited by this paper
• The preregistration revolution

  2018influential reference
• Open Access Publishing: Pros, Cons, and Current Threats

  2017cited by this paper
• The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review

  2017cited by this paper

• Futures Imagined: Navigating Sustainability, Digitalization, and Entrepreneurship in Business and Management Research

  2025cites this paper