How is international CCS discussed locally? The case of Iceland

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Global Environmental Change

• Publication date

  2025-10-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103048
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Communities conditionally support deployment of direct air capture for carbon dioxide removal in the United States

  2024cited by this paper
• Cross-border CO2 transport decreases public acceptance of carbon capture and storage

  2024cited by this paper
• Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions

  2024cited by this paper
• Media Coverage of Carbon Capture and Storage: An Analysis of Established and Emerging Themes in Dutch National Newspapers

  2023cited by this paper
• Carbon removal demonstrations and problems of public perception

  2023cited by this paper
• A synthetic review of the trust-participation nexus: Towards a relational concept of trust in energy system transformations to net zero

  2023cited by this paper
• CCS industrial clusters: Building a social license to operate

  2022cited by this paper
• Don't send us your waste gases: Public attitudes toward international carbon dioxide transportation and storage in Europe

  2022cited by this paper
• Fixed Amidst Change: 20 Years of Media Coverage on Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany

  2022cited by this paper
• Understanding contrasting narratives on carbon dioxide capture and storage for Dutch industry using system dynamics

  2021cited by this paper
• Attractions of delay: Using deliberative engagement to investigate the political and strategic impacts of greenhouse gas removal technologies

  2021cited by this paper
• Techno-economic assessment of an industrial carbon capture hub sharing a cement rotary kiln as sorbent regenerator

  2021cited by this paper
• Stuck on coal and persuasion? A critical review of carbon capture and storage communication

  2021cited by this paper
• How do people perceive carbon capture and storage for industrial processes? Examining factors underlying public opinion in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

  2021cited by this paper
• Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade

  2021cited by this paper
• Social science for the next decade of carbon capture and storage

  2021cited by this paper
• Exploring Narratives on Negative Emissions Technologies in the Post-Paris Era

  2021cited by this paper
• Different This Time? The Prospects of CCS in the Netherlands in the 2020s

  2021cited by this paper
• Who wants North Sea CCS, and why? Assessing differences in opinion between oil and gas industry respondents and wider energy and environmental stakeholders

  2021cited by this paper
• The Discourse and Reality of Carbon Dioxide Removal: Toward the Responsible Use of Metaphors in Post-normal Times

  2020cited by this paper
• Distributive fairness and local acceptance of wind turbines: The role of compensation schemes

  2020cited by this paper
• Community compensation in the context of Carbon Capture and Storage: Current debates and practices

  2020cited by this paper
• Delaying decarbonization: Climate governmentalities and sociotechnical strategies from Copenhagen to Paris

  2020cited by this paper
• When controversies cascade: Analysing the dynamics of public engagement and conflict in the Netherlands and Switzerland through “controversy spillover”

  2020cited by this paper
• Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom

  2020cited by this paper
• Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany

  2019cited by this paper
• Challenges and Opportunities of Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) for Communities

  2019cited by this paper
• Social shaping of deep geothermal projects in Alsace: politics, stakeholder attitudes and local democracy

  2018cited by this paper
• Geothermal Energy in Switzerland: Highlighting the Role of Context

  2018cited by this paper
• Germany’s “No” to carbon capture and storage: Just a question of lacking acceptance?

  2018cited by this paper
• The chemistry and saturation states of subsurface fluids during the in situ mineralisation of CO2 and H2S at the CarbFix site in SW-Iceland

  2017cited by this paper
• Challenges for social impact assessment in coastal regions: A case study of the Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project

  2017cited by this paper
• Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions

  2016cited by this paper
• Carbon capture and storage in the UK and Germany: easier task, stronger commitment?

  2015cited by this paper
• Developments in public communications on CCS

  2015cited by this paper
• Developing communications about CCS: three lessons learned

  2015cited by this paper
• Organisational aspects of public engagement in European energy infrastructure planning: the case of early-stage CCS projects

  2015cited by this paper
• Catastrophism toward ‘opening up’ or ‘closing down’? Going beyond the apocalyptic future and geoengineering

  2015cited by this paper
• Carbon Storage in Basalt

  2014cited by this paper
• What's in store: lessons from implementing CCS

  2012cited by this paper
• Exploring CCS community acceptance and public participation from a human and social capital perspective

  2012cited by this paper
• Public Responses to Co2 Storage Sites: Lessons from Five European Cases

  2012cited by this paper
• It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht

  2012cited by this paper
• What drives local public acceptance–Comparing two cases from Germany

  2011cited by this paper
• Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the dutch CCS case barendrecht

  2011cited by this paper
• Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS.

  2010cited by this paper
• Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories

  2010cited by this paper
• The Role of Social Factors in Shaping Public Perceptions of CCS: Results of Multi-State Focus Group Interviews in the U.S.

  2009cited by this paper
• How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: The case of carbon dioxide capture and storage

  2009cited by this paper
• Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology

  2008cited by this paper
• Effective EU and Member State policies for stimulating CCS

  2008cited by this paper
• Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide.

  2004cited by this paper
• The Songlines of Risk

  1999cited by this paper
• Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms

  1990cited by this paper
• Problems and Procedures in the Regulation of Technological Risk

  1980cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.