Influencing Confidence: Testing Ways to Increase or Decrease Confidence in Knowledge

This paper examines approaches for influencing people's confidence in their knowledge without influencing knowledge. Three studies examined the relative effectiveness of training and false feedback approaches. Participants chose which of two IKEA products they thought was more expensive and indicated their confidence in that judgment for 50 product pairs. In Study 1, participants took part in one of five conditions designed to manipulate their confidence: false feedback‐increasing, false feedback‐decreasing, training‐increasing, training‐decreasing, or control. For false feedback, we told participants they did very well or poorly on the task. For training‐increasing, we gave participants information about IKEA pricing that appeared useful but was difficult to implement. For training‐decreasing, we developed an automated calibration training technique that provided personalized calibration feedback consisting of a calibration diagram accompanied by textual summary information and advice. Neither the false feedback nor training approach increased confidence on 50 subsequent knowledge‐confidence judgments. However, both manipulations designed to reduce confidence were successful, with a substantially larger effect in the calibration training condition. In Study 2, we adapted the calibration training approach to provide false feedback indicating participants were either underconfident or overconfident. Both the original calibration training pproach and the new false feedback approach indicating overconfidence reduced confidence, and the false feedback approach indicating underconfidence increased confidence. Study 3 tested the effectiveness of this new false feedback approach on an on‐line rather than student sample, finding essentially the same results as those in Study 2. Throughout the three studies, the effects of the manipulations extended to overconfidence, overall calibration, and the Brier score. The results provide a potential tool for research and practice regarding confidence in knowledge.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

• Publication date

  2025-11-03

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/bdm.70048
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Thinking without knowing: Psychological and behavioral consequences of unjustified confidence regarding blackjack strategy

  2023cited by this paper
• Automated calibration training for forecasters

  2023cited by this paper
• Outcome feedback reduces over-forecasting of inflation and overconfidence in forecasts

  2021cited by this paper
• Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer‐based comparisons

  2020cited by this paper
• Confidence Calibration: An Introduction With Application to Quality Improvement.

  2020cited by this paper
• The Importance of Calibration in Clinical Psychology

  2020cited by this paper
• Attitudes toward risk and uncertainty: The role of subjective knowledge and affect

  2020cited by this paper
• Take-Up of Financial Education: Demographic Characteristics and Prior Knowledge

  2019cited by this paper
• How objective and subjective knowledge affect insurance choices

  2017cited by this paper
• Confidence Calibration in a Multiyear Geopolitical Forecasting Competition

  2017cited by this paper
• When Knowledge Is Demotivating

  2014cited by this paper
• Identifying the Effects of Unjustified Confidence versus Overconfidence: Lessons Learned from Two Analytic Methods.

  2014cited by this paper
• Psychological Strategies for Winning a Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament

  2014cited by this paper
• Subjective Knowledge in Consumer Financial Decisions

  2013cited by this paper
• Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research.

  2013cited by this paper
• Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety?

  2012cited by this paper
• INAPPROPRIATE CONFIDENCE AND RETIREMENT PLANNING: FOUR STUDIES WITH A NATIONAL SAMPLE.

  2012cited by this paper
• Know thyself: misperceptions of actual performance undermine achievement motivation, future performance, and subjective well-being.

  2010cited by this paper
• Metacognition, risk behavior, and risk outcomes: the role of perceived intelligence and perceived knowledge.

  2005cited by this paper
• The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect

  2005cited by this paper
• Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: evidence for a confidence heuristic

  2004cited by this paper
• Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice

  2004cited by this paper
• Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know

  2000cited by this paper
• Training to Improve Calibration and Discrimination: The Effects of Performance and Environmental Feedback.

  2000cited by this paper
• The domain specificity and generality of overconfidence: Individual differences in performance estimation bias

  1997cited by this paper
• Catastrophic worrying as a function of changes in problem-solving confidence

  1996cited by this paper
• External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score

  1982cited by this paper
• Training for calibration.

  1980cited by this paper
• Reliability of Subjective Probability Forecasts of Precipitation and Temperature

  1977cited by this paper
• OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS.

  1965cited by this paper
• VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY

  1950cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.