Female traits often covary with male mating tactics. In single-tactic mating systems, males show a restricted range of phenotypes. In contrast, in mixed-tactic species, males vary in behaviour, size, and coloration. The consequences of such differences in mating system for female behaviour and cognition are poorly understood. Poeciliid fish are an excellent clade for addressing this question: males of some species have exclusively forced mating (all-coercive), whereas others (mixed-tactic) also display or defend territories. We compared exploration, shyness, social motivation, and cognitive flexibility in two syntopic species pairs: all-coercive Gambusia affinis and mixed-tactic Poecilia latipinna (Texas), and all-coercive Pseudopoecilia fria and mixed-tactic Poecilia gilli (Ecuador). Species differed by mating system in social motivation, exploration, and inhibitory control at each location. However, directionality diverged from studies in predator-free conditions. All-coercive taxa were more exploratory and socially motivated in both pairs and more cognitively flexible in the Ecuadorian pair. Relationships between shyness, mating system, and body size contrasted between the locations, implicating ecology. General linear models revealed size and location to supersede mating system in explaining trait variation. We show that mating system alone cannot explain species-level variation in female behaviour and cognition, and we discuss factors, such as predation regime, that might also shape traits.
Body size, mating system, and ecology interact to shape behaviour and cognition in two syntopic pairs of poeciliid fish
Callen M Inman,Justin Yeager,Pedro Jiménez-Prado,Molly E. Cummings
Published 2025 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publication date
2025-11-01
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1