Replicability has become a heated issue in empirical science. In interdisciplinary fields, such as dyslexia research, replications are deemed challenging due to the linguistic, cognitive, and contextual complexity of literacy. We discuss whether dyslexia research faces a replicability crisis and the implications of replicability issues for researchers, educators, and practitioners. We examine potential causes of low replicability specific to dyslexia studies, including conceptual, methodological, and statistical variances observed in the context of psycho‐ and neurolinguistics. We argue that understanding the sources of variability is crucial for distinguishing between non‐replication and non‐generalization. Embracing variability while increasing transparency and specificity in scientific reports can ultimately help build robust theories in dyslexia research. We advocate for the development of valid instruments, along with the promotion of individual difference research and large‐scale replications, to inform researchers and practitioners on what can make dyslexia research more replicable.
Dyslexia Research and Replicability: Should We Be Worried?
Anna Yi Leung,T. Logvinenko,Xenia Schmalz
Published 2025 in Mind, Brain, and Education
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Mind, Brain, and Education
- Publication date
2025-12-10
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-96 of 96 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1