Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology †

J. Asendorpf,M. Conner,F. Fruyt,J. Houwer,Jaap J. A. Denissen,K. Fiedler,Susann Fiedler,D. Funder,Reinhold Kliegl,Brian A. Nosek,M. Perugini,B. Roberts,Manfred J. Schmitt,M. Aken,H. Weber,J. Wicherts

Published 2013 in European Journal of Personality

ABSTRACT

Replicability of findings is at the heart of any empirical science. The aim of this article is to move the current replicability debate in psychology towards concrete recommendations for improvement. We focus on research practices but also offer guidelines for reviewers, editors, journal management, teachers, granting institutions, and university promotion committees, highlighting some of the emerging and existing practical solutions that can facilitate implementation of these recommendations. The challenges for improving replicability in psychological science are systemic. Improvement can occur only if changes are made at many levels of practice, evaluation, and reward. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2013

  • Venue

    European Journal of Personality

  • Publication date

    2013-03-01

  • Fields of study

    Psychology

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-100 of 130 references · Page 1 of 2

CITED BY

Showing 1-100 of 765 citing papers · Page 1 of 8