Do payments for environmental services impact forest cover? An evaluation of the reflorestar program

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Ecological Economics

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108884
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Redesigning payments for ecosystem services to increase cost-effectiveness

  2024cited by this paper
• Land conflicts from overlapping claims in Brazil’s rural environmental registry

  2024cited by this paper
• Impact evaluation with nonrepeatable outcomes: The case of forest conservation

  2024cited by this paper
• Payments for ecosystem services did not crowd out pro-environmental behavior: Long-term experimental evidence from Uganda

  2023cited by this paper
• No crowding out among those terminated from an ongoing PES program in Colombia

  2023cited by this paper
• Using payment for ecosystem services to meet national reforestation commitments: impacts of 20+ years of forestry incentives in Guatemala

  2023cited by this paper
• The effect of Payments for Ecosystem Services on forest cover, land use, and capacity building in northern Mexico

  2023cited by this paper
• Payment for environmental services to reduce deforestation: Do the positive effects last?

  2023cited by this paper
• Logs with Zeros? Some Problems and Solutions

  2022cited by this paper
• Can short-term payments for ecosystem services deliver long-term tree cover change?

  2020cited by this paper
• Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials

  2020cited by this paper
• Forest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil

  2020cited by this paper
• Impact evaluation using Difference-in-Differences

  2019cited by this paper
• Impacts of Conservation Incentives in Protected Areas

  2019cited by this paper
• Payment for ecosystem services programs in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Effective but not enough

  2019cited by this paper
• From hotspot to hopespot: An opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

  2018cited by this paper
• The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review

  2018cited by this paper
• The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services

  2018cited by this paper
• Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs

  2018cited by this paper
• Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators

  2018cited by this paper
• The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

  2017cited by this paper
• Cash for carbon: A randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation

  2017cited by this paper
• Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment

  2016cited by this paper
• Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services

  2016cited by this paper
• Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services

  2015cited by this paper
• How Effective Are Biodiversity Conservation Payments in Mexico?

  2015cited by this paper
• Evaluation of the Permanence of Land Use Change Induced by Payments for Environmental Services in Quindío, Colombia

  2014cited by this paper
• Additionality in agricultural conservation payment programs

  2013cited by this paper
• Impactos do Programa Bolsa Floresta: uma avaliação preliminar

  2012cited by this paper
• Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program

  2012cited by this paper
• Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica

  2012cited by this paper
• Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews

  2011cited by this paper
• Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services

  2010cited by this paper
• Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Participation in Costa Rica's Program of Payments for Environmental Services

  2009cited by this paper
• Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching

  2009cited by this paper
• PROAMBIENTE: UMA POLTICA DE PAGAMENTO DE SERVIOS AMBIENTAIS NO BRASIL

  2008cited by this paper
• Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries

  2008cited by this paper
• Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

  2007cited by this paper
• Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments

  2006cited by this paper
• On the generalized distance in statistics

  1936cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.