We develop a theory of change for payments for environmental services (PES) to review their imminent strengths and weaknesses in light of a growing body of impact evaluation studies. We show that PES are probably at least as environmentally additional as other conservation tools, based on the limited evidence. The original vision of PES as being direct, flexible, and potentially effective remains valid, but PES design and implementation have to be upgraded in their economic functioning to better realize this potential. Adverse self-selection, inadequate administrative targeting, and ill-enforced conditionality constitute three key obstacles that may considerably hamper PES success. Policies such as spatial targeting to service density, threat and cost levels, and payment differentiation can alleviate the design challenges. PES site selection needs to further move into high-threat areas. Making adequate PES design choices also requires the political will to boost environmental effects.
Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials
S. Wunder,J. Börner,D. Ezzine‐de‐Blas,S. Feder,S. Pagiola
Published 2020 in Annual Review of Resource Economics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Annual Review of Resource Economics
- Publication date
2020-10-05
- Fields of study
Business, Economics, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
- No references are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 references · Page 1 of 1