This paper aims to examine consumers’ reactions to competitive benchmarking. The roles of consumer–brand identification and perceptions of brand dilution are explored. Five experiments test whether brand identification moderates consumers’ responses to competitive benchmarking. To explore the underlying process, brand image dilution is tested as a mediator of the effect of identification on responses to benchmarking. Meta-analyses across studies provide larger-sample aggregate tests of the key findings. The findings support the prediction that competitive benchmarking is received more favorably by consumers who do not identify with the benchmarking brand (compared to those who identify with the brand). Perceptions that competitive benchmarking would dilute the brand’s image account for the negative reactions to benchmarking by highly identified consumers, even when these consumers did not hold negative attitudes toward the competitive brand. This research also showed that the potentially negative reactions by highly identified consumers can be overcome by reframing the competitive benchmarking decision as consistent with the brand’s image. Findings are derived from scenario-based experiments posing a benchmarking or innovation decision related to either fictitious or real brands. Brands should consider consumer–brand identification when implementing benchmarking strategies. Reframing the decision to align with the brand’s image can help mitigate negative reactions. This study explores a novel downside of consumer–brand identification. Marketers need guidance on how to manage this generally desirable consumer segment when competitive benchmarking is used.
Consumer response to competitive benchmarking: the role of self-brand identification
Lifeng Yang,Melissa D. Cinelli,Duane T. Wegener
Published 2026 in European Journal of Marketing
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2026
- Venue
European Journal of Marketing
- Publication date
2026-01-01
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-58 of 58 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1