Beyond net zero climate targets: a research agenda for absolute environmental sustainability assessment to support decisions at different scales

Recent years have seen a wave of net zero targets for greenhouse gas emissions. These represent translations of the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to well below 2 °C to targets for central actors, such as countries, cities and companies. Net zero climate targets hold the potential of a paradigm shift in how individual actors pursue sustainability, away from incremental improvements and towards sufficient reductions in environmental burdens. To fully realize that potential, we argue in this Topical Review that net zero targets should be complemented by absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA). This can inform decision-makers at different scales about the environmental performance required for societies to meet the needs of their people within the environment´s carrying capacities. We identify three limitations of current net zero climate targets: (i) conflict with equity norms, (ii) involve crude quantification of upstream and downstream emissions, and (iii) risk causing burden shifts to other environmental problems. We use these three limitations to define four criteria that AESA methods should fulfill: (1) comprehensive in covering all relevant environmental problems, (2) consistent in the selection of environmental indicators and quantification of carrying capacities, (3) justice attentive in accommodating different stakeholder perspectives, and (4) granular in the representation of life cycle production technologies and their locations and timings. We find that existing AESA methods do not yet meet these four criteria and develop a research agenda for closing the gaps towards mature methods. We apply the research agenda on the case of science-based targets for nature (SBTN), demonstrating that it can guide future methodological innovation in AESA. The proposed research agenda may lead to advanced methods that reshape the practice of carrying out AESA and vastly increase its value in decision making at different scales.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Environmental Research Letters

• Publication date

  2026-01-27

• Fields of study

  Political Science, Physics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ae3dfa
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Evaluation of global biotic resource consumption against absolute boundaries

  2026cited by this paper
• Uncertainty-aware machine learning to predict non-cancer human toxicity for the global chemicals market

  2026cited by this paper
• Advancing absolute environmental sustainability assessment: Introducing the first technical guidance and a call for feedback

  2025cited by this paper
• Thresholds of significant harm at global level: The journey of the Earth Commission

  2025cited by this paper
• Exploring pathways for world development within planetary boundaries

  2025cited by this paper
• Applying machine learning to input–output analysis: a new perspective on identifying key Australian industries

  2025cited by this paper
• Evaluating mineral resource boundaries for application in absolute environmental sustainability assessment

  2025cited by this paper
• Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production

  2025cited by this paper
• Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries.

  2025cited by this paper
• Approaches for aggregating data from the regional to the global level: importance for conclusions on Earth system state

  2025cited by this paper
• Applying environmental sustainability boundaries for climate change in life cycle assessment: A review of approaches and implications for policymaking

  2024cited by this paper
• Using process-based life cycle assessment to help companies identify emission reduction potentials in their value chain: a case study in the petroleum industry

  2024cited by this paper
• Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries

  2024cited by this paper
• Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: A critical review

  2024cited by this paper
• Characterizing Freshwater Ecotoxicity of More Than 9000 Chemicals by Combining Different Levels of Available Measured Test Data with In Silico Predictions

  2024cited by this paper
• Translating Earth system boundaries for cities and businesses

  2024cited by this paper
• The Zero Emissions Commitment and climate stabilization

  2023cited by this paper
• Environmental problem shifting from climate change mitigation: A mapping review

  2023cited by this paper
• Potential for Machine Learning to Address Data Gaps in Human Toxicity and Ecotoxicity Characterization

  2023cited by this paper
• Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries

  2023influential reference
• Life cycle impact assessment framework for assessing physical effects on biota of marine microplastics emissions

  2023cited by this paper
• Why process‐level Scope 3 accounting is needed for delivering supply chain greenhouse gas emission reduction

  2023influential reference
• Going beyond carbon: An "Earth System Impact" score to better capture corporate and investment impacts on the Earth system

  2023cited by this paper
• Life-cycle assessment to guide solutions for the triple planetary crisis

  2023influential reference
• Safe and just Earth system boundaries

  2023cited by this paper
• Towards circular plastics within planetary boundaries

  2023influential reference
• Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries

  2023cited by this paper
• Can Science-Based Targets Make the Private Sector Paris-Aligned? A Review of the Emerging Evidence

  2022cited by this paper
• Toward Assessing Absolute Environmental Sustainability of Chemical Pollution

  2022cited by this paper
• Life cycle assessment‐based Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment is also relative

  2022cited by this paper
• Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities

  2022cited by this paper
• Net Zero: Science, Origins, and Implications

  2022influential reference
• Understanding and addressing the planetary crisis of chemicals and plastics

  2022cited by this paper
• A planetary boundary-based method to assess freshwater use at the global and local scales

  2022cited by this paper
• Energy systems modeling and optimization for absolute environmental sustainability: current landscape and opportunities

  2022cited by this paper
• A prototype Earth system impact metric that accounts for cross-scale interactions

  2021cited by this paper
• The Anthropocene reality of financial risk

  2021cited by this paper
• A planetary boundary-based environmental footprint family: From impacts to boundaries

  2021cited by this paper
• Revisiting the application and methodological extensions of the planetary boundaries for sustainability assessment.

  2021cited by this paper
• Accounting matters: Revisiting claims of decoupling and genuine green growth in Nordic countries

  2021cited by this paper
• An integrated approach to quantifying uncertainties in the remaining carbon budget

  2021influential reference
• From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting ‘science-based’ emission targets

  2021influential reference
• Accounting for Climate Change

  2021cited by this paper
• Assessing the rapidly-emerging landscape of net zero targets

  2021cited by this paper
• The meaning of net zero and how to get it right

  2021influential reference
• Reconciling safe planetary targets and planetary justice: Why should social scientists engage with planetary targets?

  2021cited by this paper
• Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix

  2021cited by this paper
• Path to net zero is critical to climate outcome

  2021influential reference
• Stockholm to Stockholm: Achieving a safe Earth requires goals that incorporate a just approach

  2021cited by this paper
• Life cycle assessment applying planetary and regional boundaries to the process level: a model case study

  2020influential reference
• Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture

  2020cited by this paper
• A planetary boundary-based method for freshwater use in life cycle assessment: Development and application to a tomato production case study

  2020influential reference
• The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science

  2020cited by this paper
• Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories.

  2020cited by this paper
• A comprehensive planetary boundary-based method for the nitrogen cycle in life cycle assessment: Development and application to a tomato production case study.

  2020influential reference
• Adding country resolution to EXIOBASE: impacts on land use embodied in trade

  2020cited by this paper
• Low carbon cities in 2050? GHG emissions of European cities using production-based and consumption-based emission accounting methods

  2020cited by this paper
• Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition

  2020cited by this paper
• Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications

  2020influential reference
• Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries

  2020cited by this paper
• Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature

  2020cited by this paper
• Tracking the carbon emissions of Denmark's five regions from a producer and consumer perspective

  2020cited by this paper
• Downscaling the planetary boundaries in absolute environmental sustainability assessments – A review

  2020influential reference
• Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario

  2020cited by this paper
• Framework to define environmental sustainability boundaries and a review of current approaches

  2020cited by this paper
• Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0

  2020cited by this paper
• Defining ‘science-based targets’

  2020influential reference
• Absolute sustainability: Challenges to life cycle engineering

  2020cited by this paper
• The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change

  2020cited by this paper
• Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways

  2019cited by this paper
• Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions

  2019cited by this paper
• Powering sustainable development within planetary boundaries

  2019cited by this paper
• Challenges and opportunities towards improved application of the planetary boundary for land-system change in life cycle assessment of products

  2019cited by this paper
• The role of life cycle engineering (LCE) in meeting the sustainable development goals – report from a consultation of LCE experts

  2019cited by this paper
• Development of a life-cycle impact assessment methodology linked to the Planetary Boundaries framework

  2018cited by this paper
• Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic Life Cycle Assessment.

  2018cited by this paper
• What does it really mean to be a strongly sustainable company? – A response to Nikolaou and Tsalis

  2018cited by this paper
• Finance and the Earth system – Exploring the links between financial actors and non-linear changes in the climate system

  2018cited by this paper
• Towards defining an environmental investment universe within planetary boundaries

  2018cited by this paper
• EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi‐Regional Input‐Output Tables

  2018cited by this paper
• Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects

  2018cited by this paper
• Achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals within 9 planetary boundaries

  2018cited by this paper
• Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use

  2018cited by this paper
• Is Earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting

  2017cited by this paper
• LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.

  2017influential reference
• Why it's time for Doughnut Economics

  2017cited by this paper
• Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography

  2017cited by this paper
• Challenges in implementing a Planetary Boundaries based Life-Cycle Impact Assessment methodology

  2016cited by this paper
• The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology

  2016cited by this paper
• Environmental impact food labels combining carbon, nitrogen, and water footprints

  2016cited by this paper
• Quantifying historical carbon and climate debts among nations

  2016cited by this paper
• Ecological Economics : Principles and Applications

  2016cited by this paper
• Corporate Sustainability Management

  2016cited by this paper
• Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

  2015cited by this paper
• The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration

  2015influential reference
• Introducing carrying capacity-based normalisation in LCA: framework and development of references at midpoint level

  2015cited by this paper
• Environmental impacts of electricity generation at global, regional and national scales in 1980–2011: what can we learn for future energy planning?

  2015cited by this paper
• Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals

  2015cited by this paper
• Moderate Emissions Grandfathering

  2014cited by this paper
• 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland

  2014cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.