Growth Mindsets and Achievement: Evidence Across Academic and Creative Domains From an International Perspective.

INTRODUCTION Developing students' transversal skills, such as creativity, alongside strong academic foundations, has become an increasing priority for education systems worldwide. However, most existing research on mindsets and achievement has focused on general intelligence growth mindsets or growth mindsets in academic domains, particularly mathematics, leaving the role of mindsets in transversal skill development largely unexplored. METHODS This study examines how growth mindset about general intelligence and domain-specific growth mindsets in mathematics, reading, and creativity are associated with achievement in mathematics, reading, and creative problem solving using data from 471,971 students across 64 education systems, drawn from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022. We extend prior research, which has largely focused on general intelligence or mathematics mindsets in single-country contexts, by analyzing multi-domain and cross-national patterns. To address unobserved individual-level confounders, we leverage within-student, between-domain variation in mindsets and achievement, providing a more rigorous assessment of domain-specific associations. We additionally estimated models separately by gender, socioeconomic background, immigrant status, and OECD versus non-OECD systems to examine how associations vary across student and system contexts. RESULTS Growth mindsets vary systematically across domains, with mathematics showing the lowest prevalence and general intelligence beliefs the highest. Domain-specific growth mindsets are positively associated with domain-congruent achievement in mathematics and reading, but not in creativity. Associations vary by student background, being stronger for girls, advantaged students, and those in OECD countries. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that growth mindsets are domain-bound rather than universal, with implications for theory, measurement, and the design of interventions tailored to academic and transversal skill domains.

• Publication year

  2026

• Venue

  Journal des adolescens

• Publication date

  2026-02-04

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Education, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/jad.70117PMID 41636320
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Psychological Science and the Blind Spot in Education: Learning and Instruction of Transversal Skills in the Twenty-First Century

  2025cited by this paper
• PISA 2022 Results (Volume III)

  2024cited by this paper
• Growth mindset mediates perceptions of teachers' and parents' process feedback in digital reading performance: Evidence from 32 OECD countries

  2024cited by this paper
• Fostering collaboration and creative thinking through extra-curricular challenges with primary and secondary students

  2023cited by this paper
• OECD Skills Outlook 2023

  2023cited by this paper
• Growth mindset and reading proficiency of ESL learners: examining the role of students’ socioeconomic status using PISA 2018 Philippine data

  2022cited by this paper
• Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives.

  2022cited by this paper
• A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?

  2022cited by this paper
• The stereotype that girls lack talent: A worldwide investigation

  2022cited by this paper
• Growth mindset predicts achievement only among rich students: examining the interplay between mindset and socioeconomic status

  2021cited by this paper
• Growth mindset and academic outcomes: a comparison of US and Chinese students

  2021cited by this paper
• Enhancing children's math motivation with a joint intervention on mindset and gender stereotypes

  2021cited by this paper
• The roles of generic and domain-specific mindsets in learning graphic design principles

  2020cited by this paper
• The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: Can computer agents replace humans?

  2020cited by this paper
• Limitations of Fixed-Effects Models for Panel Data

  2020cited by this paper
• The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: a review and some suggested improvements

  2020cited by this paper
• Only a Burden for Females in Math? Gender and Domain Differences in the Relation Between Adolescents’ Fixed Mindsets and Motivation

  2020cited by this paper
• What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?

  2020cited by this paper
• PISA 2018 Results (Volume V)

  2020cited by this paper
• Do Student Mindsets Differ by Socioeconomic Status and Explain Disparities in Academic Achievement in the United States?

  2019cited by this paper
• A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement

  2019cited by this paper
• PISA 2018 Results (Volume III)

  2019cited by this paper
• Fostering Students' Creativity and Critical Thinking

  2019cited by this paper
• Beliefs About Creativity Influence Creative Performance: The Mediation Effects of Flexibility and Positive Affect

  2018cited by this paper
• The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: An investigation of the validity of the PISA 2015 CPS tasks

  2018cited by this paper
• Do Growth Mindsets in Math Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation

  2018cited by this paper
• Adolescents’ Beliefs about Math Ability and Their Relations to STEM Career Attainment: Joint Consideration of Race/ethnicity and Gender

  2018cited by this paper
• Adaptive problem solving: Moving towards a new assessment domain in the second cycle of PIAAC

  2017cited by this paper
• Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement

  2016cited by this paper
• Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys

  2016cited by this paper
• Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

  2015cited by this paper
• Mind-Set Interventions Are a Scalable Treatment for Academic Underachievement

  2015cited by this paper
• Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance

  2015cited by this paper
• “My Questionnaire is Too Long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures

  2014cited by this paper
• Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences.

  2014cited by this paper
• Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed

  2012cited by this paper
• I like to do it, I'm able, and I know I am: longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest.

  2007cited by this paper
• Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention.

  2007cited by this paper
• Implicit theories of intelligence, perceived academic competence, and school achievement: testing alternative models.

  2006cited by this paper
• Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research

  2004cited by this paper
• Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Essays in Social Psychology.

  1999cited by this paper
• Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word From Two Perspectives

  1995cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.