Response to “The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory” DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100025

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Bioessays

• Publication date

  2011-07-07

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/bies.201100063PMID 21735460
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory

  2011cited by this paper
• Exome sequencing identifies GRIN2A as frequently mutated in melanoma

  2011cited by this paper
• The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer

  2010cited by this paper
• Reprogramming multipotent tumor cells with the embryonic neural crest microenvironment

  2008cited by this paper
• Identification and validation of oncogenes in liver cancer using an integrative oncogenomic approach.

  2006cited by this paper
• Cooperating cancer-gene identification through oncogenic-retrovirus-induced insertional mutagenesis.

  2005cited by this paper
• PAX8-PPARγ1 Fusion in Oncogene Human Thyroid Carcinoma

  2000cited by this paper
• PAX8-PPARgamma1 fusion oncogene in human thyroid carcinoma [corrected].

  2000cited by this paper
• The genetic penetrance of the activated neu oncogene for the induction of mammary cancer in vivo

  1997cited by this paper
• Combinatorial generation of variable fusion proteins in the Ewing family of tumours.

  1993cited by this paper
• Social controls on cell survival and cell death

  1992cited by this paper

• Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research

  2019cites this paper
• Mapping the continuum of research strategies

  2019cites this paper
• Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research

  2017cites this paper
• SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms

  2016cites this paper
• Chapter 15 Endogenous bioelectric cues as morphogenetic signals in vivo

  2015cites this paper
• Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and female cancer: Informing the patients

  2015cites this paper
• Nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2-associated molecular signature predicts lung cancer survival

  2015cites this paper
• Recognizing paradigm instability in theories of carcinogenesis.

  2014cites this paper
• Low-fidelity compensatory backup alternative DNA repair pathways may unify current carcinogenesis theories.

  2014cites this paper
• A novel pathogenic classification of cancers

  2014cites this paper
• Denying Genetic Causality

  2013cites this paper
• Endocrine Disruptors and the Breast: Early Life Effects and Later Life Disease

  2013cites this paper
• Are the Somatic Mutation and Tissue Organization Field Theories of Carcinogenesis Incompatible?

  2013cites this paper
• Carcinogenesis Marked by Initiation

  2013cites this paper
• Battling Cancer: In the End What Matters the Most?

  2012cites this paper
• Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: Non-local control of complex patterning

  2012cites this paper
• Is systems biology a promising approach to resolve controversies in cancer research?

  2012cites this paper
• Resting potential, oncogene-induced tumorigenesis, and metastasis: the bioelectric basis of cancer in vivo

  2012cites this paper