Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Neurosurgery

• Publication date

  2015-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000913PMID 26214320
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery

  2015influential reference
• Comparison of the Clinical Outcome in Overweight or Obese Patients After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2014cited by this paper
• A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

  2014cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort.

  2014influential reference
• Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease

  2014cited by this paper
• Comparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review

  2014influential reference
• The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

  2014cited by this paper
• Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

  2014cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.

  2014cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence

  2013cited by this paper
• [Comparison of traumatic related index in serum between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for tissue injury].

  2013cited by this paper
• Comparing minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a meta‐analysis

  2013cited by this paper
• Five-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Study

  2013influential reference
• Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.

  2013cited by this paper
• [Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis stenosis].

  2013cited by this paper
• Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.

  2013cited by this paper
• [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].

  2013cited by this paper
• Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.

  2012cited by this paper
• Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Our Experience in 86 Consecutive Cases

  2012cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies.

  2012influential reference
• Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years.

  2012cited by this paper
• Post-Operative Infection after Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): Literature Review and Cost Analysis

  2011cited by this paper
• Complications and failure to rescue after laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

  2011cited by this paper
• Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration

  2011cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

  2011influential reference
• Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

  2011cited by this paper
• Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

  2011influential reference
• Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Older Than 70 Years of Age: Analysis of Peri- and Postoperative Complications

  2011cited by this paper
• Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

  2011influential reference
• Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

  2010influential reference
• Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2

  2010cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience

  2009cited by this paper
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

  2009cited by this paper
• Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2009influential reference
• Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation.

  2008cited by this paper
• THE IMPACT OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE SURGERY ON PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN OVERWEIGHT OR OBESE PATIENTS

  2008cited by this paper
• Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Development of Amstar: a Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews

  2007cited by this paper
• PERCUTANEOUS TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR INSTABILITY

  2007cited by this paper
• Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

  2005cited by this paper
• Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion

  2003cited by this paper
• Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery.

  2002cited by this paper
• Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.

  2001cited by this paper
• Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

  2001cited by this paper
• Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

  1998cited by this paper
• Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

  1997cited by this paper
• Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

  1996cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

  1986influential reference
• Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Technical Feasibility and Initial Results

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Minimally invasive cervical spine stabilization: A multicenter study of completely percutaneous pedicle screw-rod instrumentation.

  2026cites this paper
• Long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) compared with open TLIF(O-TLIF): A retrospective cohort study for at least 5 years.

  2026cites this paper
• Does Minimally Invasive TLIF Reduce Adjacent Segment Disease and Reoperation Rates Compared With Open TLIF? A Meta-analysis

  2026cites this paper
• Is Pedicle‐Screw Internal Fixation With Two Small Incisions Superior to Traditional MI ‐ TLIF With Four Incisions? Preliminary Follow‐Up Results

  2026cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinal Fusion Surgery for Spondylolisthesis Treatment

  2025cites this paper
• Tubular Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is it the Most Versatile and Effective Technique? – A General Review in Comparison with Endoscopic Interbody Fusion Techniques

  2025cites this paper
• A Prospective Study of 3D Navigation-Guided Single-Position OLIF with Posterior Percutaneous Fixation

  2025cites this paper
• Uniportal Versus Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Facilitating Earlier Discharge for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

  2025cites this paper
• Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with unilateral vs. bilateral pedicle screw fixation in iatrogenic spondylolysis: an in-vitro human cadaveric model.

  2025cites this paper
• Minimally invasive augmented reality–guided lumbopelvic fixation for a large sacral plasmacytoma: illustrative case

  2025cites this paper
• Minimally invasive surgery outcomes for intradural extramedullary tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Cervical Cordotomy for Intractable Cancer Pain Using Microtubular Retractors: A Single Institution Case Series

  2024cites this paper
• Impact of bilateral facet joint violation on radiographic degeneration of superior adjacent segments and clinical outcomes.

  2024cites this paper
• Outcomes of Dorsolumbar and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis Treated by Minimally Invasive and Open Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study

  2024cites this paper
• ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS

  2024cites this paper
• Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and open-TLIF with bilateral decompression for degenerative lumbar diseases: a retrospective cohort study

  2024cites this paper
• Bone Density Correlates With Depth of Subsidence After Expandable Interbody Cage Placement: A Biomechanical Analysis.

  2024cites this paper
• Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study

  2024cites this paper
• Clinical Effectiveness and Biochemical Impacts of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis

  2024cites this paper
• Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2024cites this paper
• Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis

  2024cites this paper
• Patient Frailty Influences Outcome After Open, But Not Minimally Invasive, Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Case Series of 115 Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease

  2023cites this paper
• Intraoperative erector spinae plane block guided by O-arm navigation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a novel technique

  2023cites this paper
• Minimally-invasive trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion using a dual-dimension expandable cage: preliminary results of a multi-institutional retrospective study

  2023cites this paper
• [Our experience with minimally invasive decompression spine surgeries performed with microscopic and endoscopic visualization].

  2023cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.

  2023cites this paper
• Comparative Outcome Data Using Different Techniques for Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Large Single-Center Study

  2023cites this paper
• Effect of Topical Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Around the Incision on Postoperative Pain in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

  2023cites this paper
• Complications of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2023cites this paper
• Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF

  2023cites this paper
• Utility of Expandable Interbody Cages in Open Transforaminal Interbody Fusions: A Comparison With Static Cages

  2023cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

  2023cites this paper
• Patient Perceptions of Paramedian Minimally Invasive Spine Skin Incisions

  2023cites this paper
• Current understanding and the potential future of spinal fusion

  2023cites this paper
• Comparison of C-Arm-Free Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion L5-S1 (OLIF51) with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion L5-S1 (TLIF51) for Adult Spinal Deformity

  2023cites this paper
• A 30-Year Worldwide Research Productivity of Scientific Publication in Full-Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Can Provide a Better Health-Related QOL in Early Stage Than Conventional Methods in the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Diseases

  2023cites this paper
• Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Combined mini transforaminal lumbar inter body fusion with percutaneouspedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar disease

  2022cites this paper
• Patient reported outcomes after navigated minimally invasive hybrid lumbar interbody fusion (nMIS-HLIF) using cortical bone trajectory screws

  2022cites this paper
• Impact of Postoperative Length of Stay on Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2022cites this paper
• Is the Kambin's triangle safe or not for percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal oblique fixation from the posterior corner in the lumbar spine: A Neuroimaging Anatomic Assessment.

  2022cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Techniques in Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity

  2022cites this paper
• Comparison of short-term efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar diseases

  2022cites this paper
• The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Full-endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis at L4–L5: comparative study

  2022cites this paper
• Technical Note on Unilateral Biportal Lumbar Endoscopic Interbody Fusion

  2022cites this paper
• Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2022cites this paper
• Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2022cites this paper
• Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up

  2022cites this paper
• Radiation Dose Reduction and Surgical Efficiency Improvement in Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assisted by Intraoperative O-arm Navigation: A Retrospective Observational Study

  2022cites this paper
• Risk Factors for Postsurgical Gout Flares after Thoracolumbar Spine Surgeries

  2022cites this paper
• Surgical outcomes of patients who fail to reach minimal clinically important differences: comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

  2022cites this paper
• Is minimally invasive orthopedic surgery safer than open? A systematic review of systematic reviews.

  2022cites this paper
• Surface Navigation and the Influence of Navigation on MIS Surgery

  2022cites this paper
• Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of MIS-TLIF Intraoperative Implants in Patients with Osteoporosis

  2022cites this paper
• Clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates in endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): systematic review and meta-analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

  2022cites this paper
• Rapidly Progressive Paraplegia Resulting from Latent Cervical Dural Arteriovenous Fistula After Lumbar Surgery

  2022cites this paper
• Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study

  2022cites this paper
• Comparison of unremoved intervertebral disc location between two lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) techniques.

  2022cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Surgery and Navigation

  2022cites this paper
• Robotic-Assisted vs Nonrobotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Expandable versus Static Cages in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

  2021cites this paper
• Patient selection for minimally invasive spine surgery

  2021cites this paper
• Clinical Validity of 3 Different Grading Systems for Facet Joint Violation: A Retrospective Study and In-Depth Review

  2021cites this paper
• Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2021cites this paper
• Comparison of Outcomes between Robot‐Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single‐Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

  2021cites this paper
• Sagittal adjusting screws for the correction of grade IV spondylolisthesis in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: illustrative case

  2021cites this paper
• Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Parameters in Open TLIF Versus MIS-TLIF in Single- or Double-Level Lumbar Surgeries

  2021cites this paper
• Absence of small study effects in neurosurgical meta-analyses: A meta-epidemiological study.

  2021cites this paper
• Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Computer Navigation

  2021cites this paper
• Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a Meta-Analysis.

  2021cites this paper
• How Much Benefit Can Patients Acquire from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols with Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

  2021cites this paper
• Comparison of Patient Preference, Understanding, and Sentiment for Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery

  2021cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery versus Open Posterior Instrumentation Surgery for Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture

  2021cites this paper
• Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  2021cites this paper
• Microendoscope-Assisted Versus Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  2021cites this paper
• Posterior Approaches to the Thoracolumbar Spine: Open Versus MISS

  2021cites this paper
• Perioperative Modifications to the Open TLIF Provide Comparable Short-term Outcomes to the MIS-TLIF

  2021cites this paper
• Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single‐Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

  2021cites this paper
• Management of spondylolisthesis using MIS techniques: Recent advances.

  2020cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

  2020cites this paper
• Retrospective Review of Immediate Restoration of Lordosis in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Static and Expandable Interbody Cages.

  2020cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Spine Lumbar Surgery in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Robot-Assisted versus Freehand Instrumentation in Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion: Experience with Real-Time, Image-Guided Spinal Robot.

  2020cites this paper
• Surgeon and staff radiation exposure in minimally invasive spinal surgery: prospective series using a personal dosimeter.

  2020cites this paper
• Comparison of Single-Level Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions Presenting a Learning Curve

  2020cites this paper
• Expanding the horizons of minimally invasive spine surgery

  2020cites this paper
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Score is Not Predictive of Complication Incidence After Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Spine Procedures

  2020cites this paper
• Advances in Techniques and Technology in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion.

  2020cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

  2020cites this paper
• Risk factors related to superior facet joint violation during lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

  2020cites this paper
• Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.

  2020cites this paper
• Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part I: 2-Dimensional Operative Video and Technical Report.

  2020cites this paper
• Minimal-invasive transforaminale lumbale interkorporelle Fusion

  2020cites this paper
• Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide

  2020cites this paper
• Comparative study of the bone graft area and fusion rate in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between Endoscopic and Mini-open procedures. A technical note and preliminary report

  2020cites this paper
• Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy for Disc Space Preparation: Analysis of Fusion Rate and Clinical Results.

  2020cites this paper