The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2000

• Venue

  American Journal of Surgical Pathology

• Publication date

  2000-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/00000478-200004000-00011PMID 10757404
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Gleason Grading System: An Overview

  1999cited by this paper
• Heterogeneity of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.

  1994cited by this paper
• Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy

  1993cited by this paper
• Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective.

  1992cited by this paper
• Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostate

  1990cited by this paper
• Morphometric measurement of tumor volume and per cent of gland involvement as predictors of pathological stage in clinical stage B prostate cancer.

  1989cited by this paper
• Correlation of clinical stage, serum prostatic acid phosphatase and preoperative Gleason grade with final pathological stage in 275 patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

  1987cited by this paper
• Evaluation of histological grading (Gleason) in carcinoma of the prostate: Adverse influence of highest grade

  1983cited by this paper
• Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

  1974cited by this paper
• The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer.

  1967cited by this paper

• Gleason scores provide more accurate prognostic information than grade groups.

  2025cites this paper
• Genetic ancestry and radical prostatectomy findings in Hispanic/Latino patients

  2024cites this paper
• A multitask deep representation for Gleason score classification to support grade annotations

  2022cites this paper
• Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review

  2021cites this paper
• Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 is An Independent Risk Factor for Prostate Cancer with GS 7: A Retrospective Study from China.

  2021influential citation
• Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Grading Criteria and the Significance of the Amount of Intraductal Carcinoma

  2021cites this paper
• Editorial Comment to Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review

  2021cites this paper
• The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma

  2020cites this paper
• The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.

  2020cites this paper
• Comparison of Gleason scoring and the new Grade-Group System in prostate cancers: a 15-year retrospective study

  2020cites this paper
• Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model

  2020cites this paper
• Gleason Grading System

  2019cites this paper
• Contemporary Approach to Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer

  2019cites this paper
• Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: updated recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting

  2019cites this paper
• Prognostic significance of the presence of tertiary Gleason grade 5 in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy specimens in Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

  2019cites this paper
• Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study

  2019cites this paper
• OTT_A_218001 7157..7164

  2019cites this paper
• Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading

  2019cites this paper
• Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.

  2019cites this paper
• [Prostate pathology recommendations from the Uropathology working group of the Spanish Society of Pathology].

  2019cites this paper
• Practice Patterns in Reporting Tertiary Grades at Radical Prostatectomy: Survey of a Large Group of Experienced Urologic Pathologists.

  2019cites this paper
• Analysis of Functional Pattern Gleason 5 as Risk Factor for Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Gleason Pattern 7 Group 2 E 3, Prostate Adenocarcinoma

  2019cites this paper
• Prostate imaging features that indicate benign or malignant pathology on biopsy

  2018cites this paper
• Integrating tertiary Gleason pattern 5 into the ISUP grading system improves prediction of biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients

  2018cites this paper
• Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system

  2018cites this paper
• Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy

  2017cites this paper
• The effect of limited (tertiary) Gleason pattern 5 on the new prostate cancer grade groups.

  2017cites this paper
• Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians

  2017cites this paper
• Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma

  2017cites this paper
• 22 The Potential Target Therapy of Prostate Cancer Stem Cells

  2017cites this paper
• Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.

  2017cites this paper
• Histopathology of Prostate Cancer.

  2017cites this paper
• Significance of Gleason Score 7 With Tertiary Pattern 5 at Radical Prostatectomy.

  2017cites this paper
• Pathology of Prostate Cancer: What Has Changed in the Last 30 Years

  2016cites this paper
• Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.

  2016cites this paper
• Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

  2016cites this paper
• Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer

  2016influential citation
• WOMEN IN CANCER THEMATIC REVIEW: Diverse functions of DNA methylation: implications for prostate cancer and beyond.

  2016cites this paper
• Definition of Insignificant Tumor Volume of Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy-Is it Time to Increase the Threshold?

  2016cites this paper
• Chapter 53 – Prostate Cancer

  2016cites this paper
• Prognostic Significance of Positive Surgical Margins and Other Implications of Pathology Report

  2016cites this paper
• PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer

  2016cites this paper
• Whole‐lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy

  2015cites this paper
• Proteomic Identification and Systematic Verification of Biomarkers for Aggressive Prostate Cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Identification of potential mechanisms of action of 3ʹ,4ʹ,5ʹ-trimethoxyflavonol in the inhibition of prostate cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Prostate Cancer Reporting on Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

  2015cites this paper
• Methylome-wide Sequencing Detects DNA Hypermethylation Distinguishing Indolent from Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

  2015cites this paper
• Validation of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence and development of a prognostic model.

  2015cites this paper
• 38 – Molecular Basis of Prostate Cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Contemporary Gleason Grading System

  2015cites this paper
• MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology

  2014cites this paper
• Mixed high and low grade bladder tumors--are they clinically high or low grade?

  2014cites this paper
• Impact of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on prostate cancer aggressiveness: Lessons from a contemporary single institution radical prostatectomy series

  2014cites this paper
• Total submission of pelvic lymphadenectomy tissues removed during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer increases lymph node yield and detection of micrometastases

  2014cites this paper
• Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology.

  2014cites this paper
• A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy.

  2014influential citation
• How significant is upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology while discussing less invasive treatment options?

  2014cites this paper
• Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer.

  2014cites this paper
• Clinical predictors of survival in men with castration‐resistant prostate cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Surgical management of prostate cancer.

  2013cites this paper
• Prostate Cancer Histopathology Reporting Guide Radical Prostatectomy Specimen

  2013cites this paper
• Gleason 5+4 Has Worse Oncological and Pathological Outcomes Compared with Gleason 4+5: Significance of Gleason 5 Pattern

  2013cites this paper
• Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy

  2013influential citation
• Actualización en cáncer de próstata

  2013cites this paper
• Study of Incidence of Carcinoma Prostate in Central India With Reference To Gleason's grading

  2013cites this paper
• Gleason's grading in Tru-Cut biopsy specimens of prostate carcinoma

  2013cites this paper
• Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.

  2013cites this paper
• Третичный показатель Глисона и сверхмалые значения простатспецифического антигена как факторы прогноза рецидива рака предстательной железы

  2013cites this paper
• Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system

  2013cites this paper
• Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.

  2013cites this paper
• What ’ s known on the subject ? and What does the study add ?

  2013cites this paper
• Dataset for reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting

  2013cites this paper
• Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens.

  2013cites this paper
• Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens

  2013cites this paper
• Histone H1 expression in human prostate cancer tissues and cell lines

  2012cites this paper
• Gleason grading: past, present and future

  2012cites this paper
• The effect of the presence of a high-grade tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens on histopathological results and failure of biochemical treatment Radikal prostatektomi spesmenlerinde yüksek tersiyer gleason patern bulunmasinin histopatolojik sonuçlar ve biyokimyasal başarisizl

  2012influential citation
• Pathology of Prostatic Neoplasia

  2012cites this paper
• Do Adenocarcinomas of the Prostate With Gleason Score (GS)⩽6 Have the Potential to Metastasize to Lymph Nodes?

  2012cites this paper
• Role of Wnt5a in Prostate Cancer

  2012cites this paper
• Prognostic influence of the third Gleason grade in prostatectomy specimens.

  2012cites this paper
• A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

  2012cites this paper
• SCORE DE GLEASON 7 EN LA PROSTATECTOMÍA RADICAL: ¿ES LO MISMO 3+4 QUE 4+3? GLEASON SCORE OF 7 ON RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: IS IT THE SAME 3 +4 AND 4 +3?

  2012cites this paper
• Detection of prostate cancer: comparison of cancer detection rates of sextant and extended ten-core biopsy protocols.

  2012cites this paper
• Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer

  2012cites this paper
• Role of Wnt 5 a in Prostate Cancer

  2012cites this paper
• Trends in prostate needle biopsy diagnosis. A ten year experience of a medical center in Taiwan

  2012cites this paper
• Temporal changes in the pathologic assessment of prostate cancer.

  2012cites this paper
• The Potential Target Therapy of Prostate Cancer Stem Cells

  2011cites this paper
• Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.

  2011cites this paper
• Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Key elements in structured histopathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens

  2011cites this paper
• Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome.

  2011cites this paper
• Neoplastic Prostate Pathology for the Practicing Urologist: When to Call Your Pathologist About Pathology Results

  2011cites this paper
• 194 PRESENCE OF A HIGH GRADE TERTIARY GLEASON PATTERN UPGRADES THE GLEASON SUM SCORE AND INVERSELY ASSOCIATED WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL

  2011cites this paper
• Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: Can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer?

  2011cites this paper
• Gleason score correlation between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens and prediction of high-grade Gleason patterns: significance of central pathologic review.

  2011cites this paper
• In vivo assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 T with an endorectal coil.

  2011cites this paper
• The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

  2011cites this paper
• Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy

  2011cites this paper
• Update on the Gleason grading system.

  2011cites this paper