Updating Beliefs when Evidence is Open to Interpretation: Implications for Bias and Polarization

Roland G. Fryer,Philipp Harms,Matthew O. Jackson

Published 2018 in Journal of the European Economic Association

ABSTRACT

We introduce a model in which agents observe signals about the state of the world, and some signals are open to interpretation. Our decision makers first interpret each signal based on their current belief and then form a posterior on the sequence of interpreted signals. This “double updating” leads to confirmation bias and can lead agents who observe the same information to polarize. We explore the model’s predictions in an online experiment in which individuals interpret research summaries about climate change and the death penalty. Consistent with the model, there is a significant relationship between an individual’s prior and their interpretation of the summaries; and over half of the subjects exhibit polarizing behavior.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Venue

    Journal of the European Economic Association

  • Publication date

    2018-08-08

  • Fields of study

    Computer Science, Economics, Political Science

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-45 of 45 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-100 of 127 citing papers · Page 1 of 2