We introduce a model in which agents observe signals about the state of the world, and some signals are open to interpretation. Our decision makers first interpret each signal based on their current belief and then form a posterior on the sequence of interpreted signals. This “double updating” leads to confirmation bias and can lead agents who observe the same information to polarize. We explore the model’s predictions in an online experiment in which individuals interpret research summaries about climate change and the death penalty. Consistent with the model, there is a significant relationship between an individual’s prior and their interpretation of the summaries; and over half of the subjects exhibit polarizing behavior.
Updating Beliefs when Evidence is Open to Interpretation: Implications for Bias and Polarization
Roland G. Fryer,Philipp Harms,Matthew O. Jackson
Published 2018 in Journal of the European Economic Association
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Journal of the European Economic Association
- Publication date
2018-08-08
- Fields of study
Computer Science, Economics, Political Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-45 of 45 references · Page 1 of 1