Fast Click Rate Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Ear and Hearing

• Publication date

  2017-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000381PMID 27861251
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A study of adaptation mechanisms based on ABR recorded at high stimulation rate.

  2014cited by this paper
• Transtympanic Electrocochleography for the Diagnosis of Ménière's Disease

  2012cited by this paper
• Recording of auditory brainstem response at high stimulation rates using randomized stimulation and averaging.

  2012cited by this paper
• Amplitude and area ratios of summating potential/action potential (SP/AP) in Meniere's disease

  2009cited by this paper
• A comparison of two methods of using transtympanic electrocochleography for the diagnosis of Meniere's disease: click summating potential/action potential ratio measurements and tone burst summating potential measurements

  2009cited by this paper
• Electrocochleography in the evaluation of patients with Ménière's disease/endolymphatic hydrops.

  2006cited by this paper
• Signal-to-noise ratio and frequency analysis of continuous loop averaging deconvolution (CLAD) of overlapping evoked potentials.

  2006cited by this paper
• Summating potentials in Menière's disease

  2004cited by this paper
• Deconvolution of evoked responses obtained at high stimulus rates.

  2004cited by this paper
• The cumulative effect of high click rate on monaural and binaural processing in the human auditory brainstem.

  2003cited by this paper
• The effects of high stimulus rate on the electrocochleogram in normal-hearing subjects: El efecto de una alta tasa de estimulacion en la electrococleografia de sujetos normoyentes

  2002cited by this paper
• Rate influences on tone burst summating potential amplitude in electrocochleography: clinical(a) and experimental(b) data.

  2001cited by this paper
• Cochlear potentials in clinical audiology.

  1997cited by this paper
• Normal summating potential to tone bursts recorded from the tympanic membrane in humans.

  1994cited by this paper
• Tympanic electrocochleography for evaluation of endolymphatic hydrops

  1992cited by this paper
• Amplitude change with click rate in human brainstem auditory-evoked responses.

  1991cited by this paper
• Electrocochleographic changes in relation to cochlear histopathology in experimental endolymphatic hydrops.

  1988cited by this paper
• The effects of ABR stimulus repetition rate in multiple sclerosis.

  1987cited by this paper
• The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus.

  1987cited by this paper
• Summating Potential and Water Balance in Meniere's Disease

  1986cited by this paper
• A developmental study on the effect of stimulus rate on the auditory evoked brain-stem response.

  1984cited by this paper
• Maximum length sequences -- a fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses.

  1982cited by this paper
• A Study of Methods Used to Enhance Wave I in the Auditory Brain Stem Response

  1982cited by this paper
• The summating potential and Meniere's disease. I. Summating potential amplitude in Meniere and non-Meniere ears.

  1981cited by this paper
• The auditory brainstem response in neuro-otology: perspectives and problems.

  1981cited by this paper
• The auditory brainstem response in neuro-otology: perspectives and problems.

  1981cited by this paper
• Auditory brain stem evoked potentials: clinical promise of increasing stimulus rate.

  1981cited by this paper
• Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Electric Responses in Patients with Pontine Angle Tumors

  1980cited by this paper
• Changes in human eighth nerve action potential as a function of stimulation rate.

  1978cited by this paper
• Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man

  1976cited by this paper
• Electro‐cochleography

  1971cited by this paper
• Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans.

  1971cited by this paper

• Multispecies initial numerical validation of an efficient algorithm prototype for auditory brainstem response hearing threshold estimation.

  2024cites this paper
• Multi-species numerical validation of an efficient algorithm for auditory brainstem response hearing threshold estimation

  2024cites this paper
• Stimulus Rate Effect on Electrocochleogram Components in Adults with High Risk for Noise Exposure

  2022influential citation
• Abnormal neural adaptation consequent to combined exposure to jet fuel and noise

  2022cites this paper
• Examining the Profile of Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy Using iPhone Health App Data and Cochlear and Brainstem Electrophysiological Responses to Fast Clicks Rates.

  2022cites this paper
• Evidence of Cochlear Synaptopathy and the Effect of Systemic Steroid in Acute Idiopathic Tinnitus With Normal Hearing

  2021cites this paper
• The effects of aging on peripheral and central auditory function in adults with normal hearing.

  2021cites this paper
• Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes

  2021cites this paper
• Can auditory brainstem response accurately reflect the cochlear function?

  2020cites this paper
• Human Summating Potential Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution: Response Amplitudes Vary with Tone Burst Repetition Rate and Duration

  2017cites this paper
• The Effect of Rate on Tone Burst Extratympanic Electrocochleography in Adults with Normal Hearing

  2017cites this paper
• New metric for optimizing Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution (CLAD) sequences under the 1/f noise model

  2017cites this paper
• Biomarkers for Hearing Dysfunction: Facts and Outlook

  2017cites this paper