A risk‐based measure of time‐varying prognostic discrimination for survival models

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Biometrics

• Publication date

  2017-09-01

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/biom.12628PMID 27893925PMCID PMC5466878
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Weak convergence and empirical processes

  2019cited by this paper
• 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

  2014cited by this paper
• 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

  2014cited by this paper
• A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data

  2013cited by this paper
• Evaluating the incremental value of new biomarkers with integrated discrimination improvement.

  2011cited by this paper
• Prognostic factor analyses of myeloma survival with intergroup trial S9321 (INT 0141): examining whether different variables govern different time segments of survival

  2011cited by this paper
• Several methods to assess improvement in risk prediction models: Extension to survival analysis

  2011influential reference
• 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

  2010cited by this paper
• ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline Practice Guidelines 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults

  2010cited by this paper
• 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

  2010cited by this paper
• Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures

  2010cited by this paper
• Criteria for Evaluation of Novel Markers of Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

  2009cited by this paper
• Comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by M. J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929)

  2008cited by this paper
• Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond

  2008cited by this paper
• Empirical processes indexed by estimated functions

  2007cited by this paper
• Survival Model Predictive Accuracy and ROC Curves

  2005influential reference
• On the Cox Model With Time-Varying Regression Coefficients

  2005influential reference
• Local Linear Estimation for Time-Dependent Coefficients in Cox's Regression Models

  2003influential reference
• Time‐Dependent ROC Curves for Censored Survival Data and a Diagnostic Marker

  2000cited by this paper
• Prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: Model for decision making

  1989cited by this paper
• Bootstrapping Cox's Regression Model.

  1985influential reference
• Varying Coefficient Models

  1984cited by this paper
• External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score

  1982cited by this paper
• A Large Sample Study of Cox's Regression Model

  1981influential reference
• Regression Models and Life-Tables

  year unknowncited by this paper

• New findings in prognostic factor assessment for adenocarcinoma of transverse colon: a comparison study between competing-risk and COX regression analysis

  2024cites this paper
• Multivariate longitudinal data for survival analysis of cardiovascular event prediction in young adults: insights from a comparative explainable study

  2023cites this paper
• Utility of multimodal longitudinal imaging data for dynamic prediction of cardiovascular and renal disease: the CARDIA study

  2023cites this paper
• Lifetime vs 10-year Cardiovascular Disease Prediction in Young Adults Using Statistical Machine Learning and Deep Learning: The CARDIA Study

  2022cites this paper
• Development of new equations predicting the mortality risk of patients with continuous renal replacement therapy

  2022cites this paper
• Development of New Equations Predicting the Mortality Risk of Patients on Continuous RRT

  2022cites this paper
• Derivation and Validation of a Prognostic Scoring Model Based on Clinical and Pathological Features for Risk Stratification in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

  2021cites this paper
• Development and Validation of the Chronic Disease Population Risk Tool (CDPoRT) to Predict Incidence of Adult Chronic Disease

  2020cites this paper
• Extension of Risk-Based Measure of Time-Varying Prognostic Discrimination for Survival Models

  2019influential citation
• A comparison of landmark methods and time-dependent ROC methods to evaluate the time-varying performance of prognostic markers for survival outcomes

  2019cites this paper
• A Tutorial on Evaluating the Time-Varying Discrimination Accuracy of Survival Models Used in Dynamic Decision Making

  2018cites this paper
• Manuscript title : A tutorial on evaluating time-varying discrimination accuracy for survival models used in dynamic decision-making Running head : Biomarker-driven dynamic decision-making

  2018cites this paper