Comparison of pedigreed and nonpedigreed randombred control systems for use with artificial selection in the Japanese quail.

G. B. Havenstein,K. Nestor,W. Bacon

Published 1988 in Poultry Science

ABSTRACT

The performance characteristics of six replicate sublines of a randombred control, three pedigreed (P) and three nonpedigreed (NP), were studied to see if the NP mating system could be used as a method for maintaining a randombred control for selection experiments. Each subline was maintained with 32 single-pair matings, with 64 offspring placed each generation for each line. Brother X sister matings were avoided in the P but not in the NP system. The NP chicks were pedigreed in order to determine the exact numbers of brother X sister matings selected in that system, but pedigrees were not considered during selection. Records were collected on the numbers of matings producing offspring, the expected rate of inbreeding based on the effective population size, hatchability, egg production, egg weight, and the body weights of the males and females. Replicate lines in the P system had more matings that produced viable offspring, which resulted in larger effective population sizes, lower rates of inbreeding, and smaller average family sizes than those in the NP system. A number of significant differences were found between means of the replicate lines within system and between regressions of the traits measured in the individual lines on generation number. Most of these differences disappeared when the data from the three replicates within mating system were pooled and compared, suggesting that differences found between lines within system were due to random genetic drift due to restrictions in population size. It is suggested that the NP system can be used as an effective control procedure for Japanese quail breeding experiments, but that more than 32 mating pairs should be used for its maintenance in order to reduce the amount of genetic drift within the control population.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-20 of 20 references · Page 1 of 1